|
|
04-16-2008, 01:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 01:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 02:42 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: HoosieRama
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 2,396
Liked 3,853 Times in 1,401 Posts
|
|
Chris - not to rain on your parade - but that barrel looks shortened. That's probably why caliber is not found. I have a friend that has a lot of bicycle guns and there's something that doesn't look right with yours. The experts will chime in shortly
Mike
PS - I think the star signifies return/work at the factory at later date
|
04-16-2008, 02:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,398 Times in 774 Posts
|
|
I am not an expert and only have Flayderman to go by, but til an expert comes along...
It is just into the 2nd Model serial number range, which started at 91418; and it still has the 1st Model top latch. Wanna call it a Transitional?
The star is the mark applied when a gun was returned to the factory for repair or alteration. Maybe the then owner sent it in to be cut off to 1 3/4".
|
04-16-2008, 04:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: puget sound
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Hello Chris,
Interesting gun. Is the serial number on the barrel latch the same as on the butt? If it is, it a First Model Safety Hammerless no matter what the serial number says. The barrel was definitely cut and I think not at the factory. I have seen a couple of factory original 1 1/2 inch 32 and 38 Safetys, and one 1 5/8 inch 38. They were special order guns and they had the caliber marked on the side of the barrel. This barrel was obviously cut after it left the factory the first time because the roll markings on the barrel rib are incomplete. The question is did the factory cut the barrel when it was in for some sort of rework. The star usually indicates a return to the factory for some major work. Some private gunsmiths though knew that it was a factory practice to stamp a star and did so them selves when they peformed work on a Smith. The front site is pinned which is how the factory would have done it. Most gunsmiths just brazed it on. The barrel rib also seems to have the slight set back from the end of the barrel as a factory job would have. Again, many gunsmiths just cut the barrel rib flush with the barrel in one cut. The picture quality isn't great, but the milled cut that the site sits in doesn't look right to me. It looks too wide near the base. Maybe I'm seeing it wrong.
In this case a factory letter won't help you unless you know the exact date it was shipped back to the factory and the name of the person who shipped it. That would be the only way to find it in the company records. Without a factory letter to prove it, this is just another cut barreled old Safety even if it was done at the factory. Whoever did it though did a nice job.
__________________
Mark Connot
|
04-16-2008, 07:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
cflier, I am just curious. Why would you say it is a first model, even though the serial number is in the second model range? I am just curious. I will check the number on the barrel latch tomorrow. The gun is in my safe in my office at work. I will update then & also look closer at the milled cut that the sight sits in.
Thanks to everyone for the info. It is much appreciated.
Chris
|
04-16-2008, 08:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,398 Times in 774 Posts
|
|
To quote a usually reliable source (me) it has the 1st model top latch that pushes forward to open. A 2nd model would have the more usual T-shaped latch that pulls up to open.
|
04-17-2008, 07:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
04-17-2008, 12:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,398 Times in 774 Posts
|
|
I don't know the minutae of caliber markings.
I bet the star is for a nickel refinish.
|
04-17-2008, 12:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: puget sound
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Chris,
The second Safety you show is a late 3rd model 38. The barrel has not been cut but it does have a factory rework star. It might have been renickeled or some other work done, or as I explained above, some gunsmiths have been known to add a star when they worked on the old Smiths.
It was probably shipped around 1897 or 1898. Most early Safetys did not have caliber markings. But most special order and short barrel safetys did. Very early short barrel Safetys have a two line address on the left side of the barrel. And the earliest ones have the patent roll marks going up the barrel rib onto to the topstrap almost to the site. Having said all of that you can never say never when dealing with the old safetys as the factory changed their procedures at times and then changed back. The short barrel guns in general though have their own characteristics that are not necessarily shared by the standard barrel length Safety Hammerless.
__________________
Mark Connot
|
04-17-2008, 01:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
cflier, thank you very much for the info. It is much appreciated. I am alot more familier with the newer Smiths, but older ones like these, I don't know a whole lot about. Thanks again.
Chris
|
04-19-2008, 08:11 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 50
Likes: 3
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Just an opinion, but they both look like 3rd Model 38's to me. The cylinder of the snubby is too long for a 32, and the latches look identical. Am I crazy?
|
04-19-2008, 01:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: puget sound
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Local Hand,
I believe you are correct. The latch is a 3rd model 38 and the cylinder looks like a 38 S&W also. I should have looked closer.
__________________
Mark Connot
|
04-19-2008, 01:46 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by cflier: Local Hand, I believe you are correct. The latch is a 3rd model 38 and the cylinder looks like a 38 S&W also. I should have looked closer.
|
Mark; Don't blame yourself. The OP didn't include any photos of the Front or Rear of the Cylinder and/or Barrel that would have helped. And, also as part of his first Post he also stated "<span class="ev_code_RED">...I am pretty sure it is a 32 safety hammerless second model...</span>"so you were "presuming" it to be a .32. And, the remainder of your remarks were dead on!!!
|
04-20-2008, 03:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Yes it is my fault. I guess it would have been smart of me to just take a 38 shell & put it in the cylinder. I should have been able to tell by just looking at it, but I guess I just had it in my head that they were both 32's & didn't even think that they were 38's. Sorry for my mistake. Thanks for everyones help.
Chris
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|