Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2009, 10:01 PM
duman444 duman444 is offline
Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cypress Texas
Posts: 323
Likes: 1,218
Liked 658 Times in 186 Posts
Default 32 Hand Ejector

I was given a 32 hand ejector. It has a 4 digit serial number of 65XX. From previous threads I see this to no younger than a 1905 build. The last patent listed on the barrel is 1902. The revolver has been stored in cosmoline for the last 25 years, so unless cosmo attacks nickel, then the damage to the finish must have happened earlier. Can any one give me the exact year of build and why does this model not have the 5th screw in the front of the triggerguard?
Is this gun safe to fire with modern 32 ammo. From it's condition I would think firing it could not hurt it any more unless it physically breaks. Every thing on it seems to function normal. There is a slight slop in cylinder rotation when the trigger is pulled and the cylinder gap appears to be wider than the gap on my modern smiths.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 32 HE 004.jpg (56.5 KB, 125 views)
File Type: jpg 32 HE 003.jpg (71.8 KB, 156 views)
File Type: jpg 32 HE 002.jpg (69.4 KB, 151 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2009, 10:28 PM
dacoontz's Avatar
dacoontz dacoontz is offline
Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 368
Liked 1,171 Times in 373 Posts
Default

I am sure you'll get more specific info from other posters but the top screw behind the cylinder on the right side plate is the "5th" screw. There may be a screw in the front aspect of the trigger guard, but I believe there were some models that didn't have that screw. Anyway, the pistol pictured would be considered a "5 screw." Someone correct me here if I am wrong.

The finish is hammered but those grips, if true pearl, look really good and may be worth the majority value of the pistol.

I am thinking this may be a .32 Hand ejector Model of 1903 or 2nd model.

Last edited by dacoontz; 12-13-2009 at 10:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2009, 10:55 PM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 1,628
Liked 3,178 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Yes, if the gun is mechanically sound, it's perfectly safe with any modern off-the-shelf .32 S&W Long (or the older, shorter .32 S&W).

That would be consideded a pre-5 screw, 4-screw. The only way to get an exact date is from a factory letter. I have an early 4-digit (with factory target sights) that shipped in 1903. It's odd that your gun has a pinned front sight.

As to value, given the nickel loss, it isn't going to be highly collectable. They also made a ton of them. Those factory pearl grips are awesome, though. They are worth as much as the gun is. Probably in the $200-300 range (gun or grips) if sold separately.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2009, 07:49 PM
duman444 duman444 is offline
Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cypress Texas
Posts: 323
Likes: 1,218
Liked 658 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Bought a box of Mag tech .32 Long with 98 gr. lead round nose. At 10 feet it shoots 2-3" left of point of aim. Is there a way to adjust the sight? I was thinking about giving the front sight a slight bend as again this gun has not much numeric or sentimental value for me.

I have large hands and would like to get a set of of target grips for it . I found a possible replacement set on a site called gun grips for $30. Does anyone have any familiarity with them?

I have seen a couple of other threads about this model and mine also has the double main spring arrangement. I tried to get the sideplate off, but one screw is frozen and I did not want to bugger up the threads.

Thanks for the info. about the gun and I will probably give the Mother of Pearl grips back to the original owner as they have a value above what we thought it was worth. I will check with him to see if he wants to sell if any one is interested.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2009, 09:47 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is offline
SWCA Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 940
Liked 6,468 Times in 1,328 Posts
Default

Cosmoline can cause pitting, if its left on too long. Something about
moisture either getting under it, or it has some in it. Either way, its a
well-known phenomenom, to find pitting under the stuff. Maybe that is what happened to this finish.

The gun is an early 4-screw, like before 1906. The fifth frame screw was introduced in about late 1905 - early 1906 . All the models of 1899 and 1902, in K-frame, are 4-screw frames.

Soak the frame in a good solvent, like Kroil, for a day or two, without
the grips. Then, with the gun squarely on a flat surface, and the proper
size screwdriver, put the blade in the screw and rap the screwdriver
sharply with a piece of wood. The shock should travel into the screw,
breaking up the rust. You can also try rotating the screwdriver a very
small amount, both ways, to break up the rust.

The pined front sight blade is a curiosity. Could be factory , in which case the gun becomes a bit more interesting.

Later, Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:45 PM
duman444 duman444 is offline
Member
32 Hand Ejector 32 Hand Ejector  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cypress Texas
Posts: 323
Likes: 1,218
Liked 658 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Mike,
Thanks for the help. The Kroil did the trick on the stuck screw. That's the first time I used Kroil for it's inteneded purpose, I usually mix a 50/50 blend of it and Hoppes for a bore cleaner that gets under lead and makes the barrels easier to clean.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2nd model, ejector, hand ejector, k-frame, screwdriver, sideplate, solvent


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Found 1903 First Change Hand Ejector 32 hand Plain Old Dave WANTED to Buy 1 01-04-2017 04:47 PM
help identifying a .32 hand revolver (hand Ejector) jdesantiago77 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 07-25-2016 09:32 AM
.32 Hand Ejector Model of 1903 2nd Model Hand Ejector. shooter91 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 12-25-2015 08:26 PM
Hand me down hand ejector with history ElkyRacer S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 12-13-2013 03:09 AM
Sourcing a hand for a 1905 32-20 hand ejector muskrat man S&W-Smithing 13 07-11-2011 03:39 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)