|
|
03-19-2010, 01:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bellingham, WA. USA
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
A nice Victory Model.....
__________________
U. S. Navy CPO 1950-1970 (Ret)
|
03-19-2010, 09:29 PM
|
Absent Comrade US Veteran SWCA Founding Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
Nice clean Victory. Where was it shipped? Obviously a broken die stamp, not just a light stamping. Ed.
|
03-26-2010, 06:21 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 179
Liked 250 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
Chief,
That's a beautiful Victory (and great pictures). I thought you might enjoy seeing my US Navy marked Victory with a 1944 Boyt holster.
Last edited by NavyEngineer; 03-26-2010 at 06:58 PM.
Reason: Fixed pictures
|
03-28-2010, 02:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bend, OR.
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
John, That is a nice looking Victory. Interesting stamp as well.
Great pics, as always!
Engineer, that is a good looking Navy you've got. Nice holster also. The holsters are as hard/harder to find than the Navys.
Thanks to your show & tell, here are my 2 Victorys. Navy w/Boyt '44 holster on the left, USProperty marked w/Boyt '43 on the right.
I do love my Victories, and they both shoot amazingly well.
|
03-28-2010, 06:50 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 179
Liked 250 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
Kikokat,
Your Victories are beautiful. My other Victory's finish is pretty rough, and it has some large import markings (Australian service and rebuild marks as well). But they do seem to shoot pretty well. The Navy markings drew me to my first one, and I was able to pick up the second one very cheaply (although not that cheaply after all, since I had to buy all of the components and dies to reload 38 Smith and Wesson!)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.