|
|
05-27-2010, 09:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Short vs. Long Action--how do you tell?
So what are all of the ways you can tell a short from a long action, other than the date of manufacture? I'm curious in distinguishing between which ways you can tell visibly vs. having to physically have the revolver.
__________________
Aaron Terry
|
05-27-2010, 10:05 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Hammer shape.
Short: Spur in middle.
Long: Spur at top.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
05-27-2010, 11:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Was the short/long action change made on N frames as well? I guess the I frames would have all been long action as they didnt make the transition to the 50's, or did they?
|
05-27-2010, 11:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Was this a modification of the lockwork or just the hammer spur, going from long to short action?
__________________
Aaron Terry
|
05-27-2010, 12:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
My understanding is there is a difference in the location of the pivot points. may be an over simplification but if so someone will come along who knows more than me.
|
05-27-2010, 12:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
More than just the hammer shape. Long action was just what it sounds like, the hammer traveled further compared to the post-war short action which was thought to improve accuracy by having a shorter hammer fall but most shooters believe the old long action was smoother.
All the various models that were produced both before and after the war were made in both varieties. Some long action guns assembled after the war with left over parts are called transition models.
Long action M&P from 1942:
Short action M&Ps from 1949:
A 38/44 heavy Duty from 1940 with long action:
A 1960 (made in 1956) HD with the short action:
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
05-27-2010, 12:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Thank ya kindly Sir, this thread answered a few questions for me I never realized I had. LOL
|
05-27-2010, 12:43 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
There was lockwork modification as well. The hammer stud moved forward a bit so that the distance the hammer traveled was actually shortened. The terms "Long Hammer Throw" and "Short Hammer Throw" are sometimes seen in place of the phrases "long action" and "short action."
Forget the I's and J's. Long and short action distinctions are fond in the K and N revolvers. I like SP's single-glance test, but I always did it chronologically, which is kind of like going the long way around the barn.
1) All prewar hand ejectors are long action, with the exception of the K-22/40.
2) Any postwar revolver with the descriptor "Model of 1950" or later in its name is a short action revolver.
3) Guns made between 1945 and 1950 may be either short action or long action, except that ALL K-Masterpiece (the ones with the K-prefix serial number) revolvers are short action.
So if I am thinking correctly this morning, the only N-frame guns that could be either long or short are the postwar .38/44s (Outdoorsman and Heavy Duty), .357 Magnum, .44 Special Model of 1926 and .45 Model of 1917.
In the K-frames only the .38 M&P can be found in long and short action. The SV or S prefix will mark long-action guns. I tend to think that the C prefix on postwar fixed-sight revolvers always means short action, but there is a fuzzy border there because the last few thousand long action guns with S-prefix numbers mostly had short actions.
The postwar long-action guns are the ones that are usually called "transitional," as they use a mix of both prewar and postwar parts in manufacture.
I'm offering this list of observations on a "rule of thumb" basis. If there are refinements that can be added to this approach, somebody please post them.
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 12-02-2014 at 10:06 AM.
Reason: Clean up a couple of generalizations.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-27-2010, 03:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaxonPig
A 38/44 heavy Duty from 1940 with long action:
|
And also sporting what appears to be a bobbed humpback hammer. There's another one of those over there on the non-Reg Magnum thread.
__________________
David Wilson
|
05-27-2010, 03:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 2
Liked 116 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
In my opinion the pre WWII S&W revolvers with the long action had the smoothest DA trigger pulls. One can easilly feel the diffrence when doing double action pistol with the two side by side.
|
05-27-2010, 03:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the info guys. This is really fascinating.
__________________
Aaron Terry
|
05-27-2010, 03:43 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
|
|
Finally, this old guy can understand the difference.
Thanks,
__________________
NRA Instructor
|
05-27-2010, 07:40 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Connecticut Yankee
Posts: 2,380
Likes: 744
Liked 3,575 Times in 789 Posts
|
|
For a number of years I was a Bullseye shooter using a single action 14-2 as my main platform. This was in the 70's and I thought this gun was the golden rod.
Then I started collecting M&P's and discovered something. Even though the action is "longer" it's slicker. It's the cats meow. It's an ice cream sunday with your best girl. And when it's been worked on by a class gunsmith it's heaven.This is the cleanest action I have ever pulled on. Both single and double action. 1905 early fourth change SN 291666. The cylinder is not heat treated. It's been cut up and brought back to life as one of the best pistols I own. Did I say I liked I?
DW
Did I mention I used it as a carry gun?
__________________
"NUTS"
Last edited by DWFAN; 05-28-2010 at 12:17 AM.
|
12-01-2014, 12:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 436
Likes: 103
Liked 305 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Don't the long action M&Ps also have a cross pin under the cylinder release that's not found in the short action ones?
|
12-01-2014, 12:25 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real Hawkeye
Don't the long action M&Ps also have a cross pin under the cylinder release that's not found in the short action ones?
|
Well, yes and no.
First, it is not a crosspin. It is the hammer pivot stud (upon which the hammer pivots between the uncocked and cocked postions). On the earlier frames, this stud was screwed into the left side of the frame and the end is visible just below the cylinder release thumb piece.
On January 18, 1946, a management order was sent down to the floor supervisors to change this to a pressed stud on the K frame revolvers. The change seems to have been implented pretty quickly, since guns with the pressed stud seem to have started showing up in shipments that went out in April of that year.
The end of the pressed-in stud extended to the frame side, but was polished off and is usually hidden under the finish.
The high speed hammer was not adopted until early 1948, so the two changes did not coincide. In other words, no gun with a high speed hammer would have the threaded stud. But there are some revolvers with the old long action that have the pressed stud.
Here's a photograph of two .38 M&P revolvers - the one with the threaded stud shipped in March, 1946. The lower gun with the pressed stud shipped in January, 1947. Both have the long action.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-01-2014, 06:48 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,929
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Jack,
Great post.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
12-01-2014, 09:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Thank you, Jim. I try! Someday, maybe, I'll catch up to you in the level of encyclopedic knowledge. But only if I live long enough . . .
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
12-01-2014, 10:01 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 288
Likes: 688
Liked 415 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
I hope you all live long and prosper, so I can sit back and read and store more information.
__________________
Regards
Ray S&WCA #2810
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, bullseye, gunsmith, k-22, masterpiece, n-frame, outdoorsman, postwar, prewar, registered magnum, transition, wwii |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|