Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2010, 03:14 PM
IrvJr IrvJr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long

Hey All,

I went to the local gun shop the other day and saw a pair of 32 S&W Long Hand Ejector revolvers. They were in OK shape. Mechanically they seemed sound, but the finish was a bit pitted in spots and the grips were cracked on the bottom. However, overall they looked pretty good.

I really liked the guns and was thinking about buying one of them as a fun gun. Mechanically, the guns seemed OK. The timing seemed to be good and when I cocked the hammer back, the cylinder did not move much when I tried to wiggle it.

I was wondering if it's safe to fire low pressure loads in them. I was thinking about buying one of the guns (the one in better condition) and hand loading some cartridges - perhaps loading them to 32 S&W levels instead of 32 S&W Long levels.

I don't know the exact serial numbers of the two guns, but they were both around 250,000 or 275,000. I've read somewhere on the internet that S&W didn't start heat treating these guns until somewhere > serial number 331,000.

Would it be wise to buy these guns as plinkers or should I move on?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2010, 04:40 PM
Tony M. Tony M. is offline
Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FLA
Posts: 221
Likes: 134
Liked 573 Times in 97 Posts
Default

Any book load for the .32 long should be fine as long as the gun is in good shape.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2010, 08:08 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,699 Times in 2,623 Posts
Default

I have a .32 HE numbered under 215000 and I have no qualms shooting either wadcutter or modern roundnose ammo in it. Great little gun for fun at the range -- livelier than a .22 but compact and painless to shoot.

Guns numbered in the range you mentioned would be mid to late 'teens -- about the same time frame as WWI, from a European point of view, or a couple of years before American involvement.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2010, 08:54 PM
IrvJr IrvJr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

So then the general consensus is that if the guns are mechanically sound it should be OK to shoot? I will proceed with caution!

Thanks again. I really liked the way those little guns handled! I love the 3-1/4" barrels and the slim receivers. Too bad S&W doesn't still make some of these little gems!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2010, 09:29 PM
Green Frog Green Frog is offline
Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,648
Likes: 1,567
Liked 9,404 Times in 4,215 Posts
Default

The Regulation Police .32 I have (same frame) is barely enough higher in serial number to be in the heat treated cylinder range and has a 6" barrel, which on that little frame looks loooong! You are right, this little frame is the perfect size for shooting mild .32 S&W (and S&W Long) rounds. Let us know how your specimen does... we seem to be building quite the informal database about them on this forum!

Froggie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2010, 09:33 PM
m1gunner m1gunner is offline
US Veteran
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middle Ga.
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 211
Liked 610 Times in 301 Posts
Default

The factory 32 S&W is fine for solid frame revolvers, IMHO. It is the top breaks you need to be careful with.

I am shooting factory and factory duplicate loadings in a 32 HE about the same age as yours. Judging by the primers and ejection, these are low pressure rounds. The empties fall out of the chambers, and the primers look like what you see in a 38sp with light target loads.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2010, 09:38 PM
m1gunner m1gunner is offline
US Veteran
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middle Ga.
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 211
Liked 610 Times in 301 Posts
Default

Here is my Regulation Police:



Last edited by m1gunner; 11-29-2010 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 11-30-2010, 12:45 AM
TACC1 TACC1 is offline
US Veteran
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wautoma, WI 54982
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 6,564
Liked 799 Times in 499 Posts
Default

Depending on how much shooting you're planning to do, I've
had no problem locating 32 S&W ammo. Since they'll work fine
in your 32 HE, that'll save you the trouble of reloading. If you already
reload, go for it. Just a thought, TACC1.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2010, 02:03 AM
Tony M. Tony M. is offline
Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FLA
Posts: 221
Likes: 134
Liked 573 Times in 97 Posts
Default

The .32 long has to be one of the least expensive rounds to reload for. Many of my favorite loads take 2 grains or less of powder, and swaged lead SWC's and WC's are cheap and easy to find. I cast my own, so it's even cheaper.

I can find the .32 S&W (and the long versions) locally, but even the bargain ammo runs $15-20 for a box of 50, and I can load my own for about $6-$10 per hundred once I've got the brass.

If you don't reload it's not a problem, ammo can be had, but I enjoy shooting the .32's so much that I have one of my progressive presses dedicated to loading the caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2010, 04:04 PM
IrvJr IrvJr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Pulled the trigger...

Well guys, I went back to the gunshop today and picked up a .32 S&W Long revolver! I perused the selection and looked at the two 32 Hand Ejectors that they had in the case. I also looked at a Colt New Police in 32 Long. I also looked at two Colts that were in 38 S&W.

I eventually settled on a 32 S&W Hand Ejector. I was wrong about the serial numbers. One was a four digit serial number. The other (the one that I eventually bought) was serial number 1019XX. Does anyone know what year this was manufactured?

Out of all of the revolvers, the one that I bought seemed to have the best bore. It's not in great condition (the bore) but I could still see the rifling and the pits don't look to bad. The Colt New Police looked great on the exterior (it even had some of that beautiful Colt blue finish on it) but the bore of the barrel was pretty bad.

I also picked up a box of factory 32 S&W Long (Remington 98gr lead).

The sales clerk was very helpful. It turns out he likes old guns too. He was carrying on his person an old Webley in 38 S&W and he said he has a bunch of old guns, most of them from before WWII.

Anyway, I hope to take some pictures later this week and post them up for the board. I am also going to order some reloading dies and some brass and bullets and work up some handloads for this old gun. Besides the bore being a bit pitted, the gun is in good shape considering its age. Mechanically everything works really well and I checked the chamber alignment, the lock up, etc. and it all seems to be good.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 12-01-2010, 04:30 PM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 798
Liked 3,050 Times in 1,008 Posts
Default

Based on your description of the other handguns I think you made the correct choice. While I like 38 S&W and reload for it it's MUCH easier to find 32 S&W Long ammo most places. Given a choice between an old Colt and an old S&W all things being equal I'll take the S&W every time. They seem to stay tight better, parts are easier to find when needed, as well as gunsmiths when they are needed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2010, 06:00 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,699 Times in 2,623 Posts
Default

A serial number around 100000 puts your gun about 1910.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-01-2010, 06:50 PM
IrvJr IrvJr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks guys. i really like my "new" 32. I am getting an urge to buy every I-frame that I encounter. I like the I frame size, even though the grips are a little tiny. It's a cool-sized gun.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-01-2012, 11:33 AM
Ron Thomas Ron Thomas is offline
Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Model 30 .32 cal LR round butt hand ejector

...just registered...first posting. I have a Model 30 S&W .32 cal LR, I-frame, round butt, hand ejector, 3 1/4" barrel serial number 300120 and would welcome knowing a manufacture date. Would this be number 120 of the 30 series? Any information would be welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-01-2012, 04:11 PM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,218
Likes: 34,793
Liked 10,779 Times in 3,671 Posts
Default

Hello Ron. Welcome to the forum! Just a friendly note. It is better to start your own thread rather than piggy-backing on an existing one. It is easier to keep the responses particular to your topic. Don't be surprised if the Moderators split your question out into a new thread.

Are you sure about your .32 being a model 30? Is MOD. 30 stamped in the yoke area when the cylinder is open? Your serial number would indicate an earlier .32 HE 3rd model. We need pictures ... as many as you can make.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-02-2012, 03:24 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long S&W Hand Ejector 32 S&W Long  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,247
Likes: 11,901
Liked 20,588 Times in 8,580 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Thomas View Post
...just registered...first posting. I have a Model 30 S&W .32 cal LR, I-frame, round butt, hand ejector, 3 1/4" barrel serial number 300120 and would welcome knowing a manufacture date. Would this be number 120 of the 30 series? Any information would be welcome.
Hi Ron and welcome to the forum. There's no 32 cal LR so I think you mean the .32 S&W Long cartridge. A 300120 number is not a series so no, it's not 120 of a 30 series. The Model numbers did not come about until 1957. So as Guy has correctly identified, you have a Model .32 Hand Ejector from the 1920s era which after several changes evolved into the Model 30.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 10-02-2012 at 05:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
colt, ejector, hand ejector, lock, remington, s&w, wadcutter, webley, wwi, wwii

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
32 Long CTG Hand Ejector ixjohnw S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 03-21-2017 03:12 PM
S&W .32 Long Hand Ejector 1srelluc S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 18 03-13-2017 04:10 PM
32 S&W Long Hand Ejector gsfxst S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 12-16-2016 12:37 AM
.32 Long Hand Ejector whiteyjones S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 03-07-2013 09:37 PM
.32 S&W Long Hand Ejector zainyD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 12-29-2012 10:45 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)