|
|
04-13-2011, 09:55 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 479
Likes: 107
Liked 116 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Can someone identify this one?
A guy locally sent me pics of this old Smith he wants to trade for one of my semi's. I have no idea what model this is and he is also clueless as to what he has. He did say it has the numbers 8 31 09 on it though. Looking at the gun, I seriously doubt it is a fair trade for mine, but I am still curious as to what it has.
It does say .38 sp ctg on it, and also has been stamped on the left side "Converted By Cosswell & Harrington London". I don't know if this is pre-61, but assumed it is which is why I posted here. If anyone knows what this is, an approximate value would be appreciated. Thanks guys.....
Last edited by Nevadadvx; 04-13-2011 at 11:23 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2011, 10:03 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Maine
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 47
Liked 621 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
It's a .38 M&P. The barrel has been cut down and a different front sight added. I'm assuming that "Converted" means it was converted from .38/200 (.38 S&W) to .38 special. If this is the case and .38 special ammo is fired through it, most likely the cases will split as the diameter of .38 S&W is slightly larger. This may be and old "Lend Lease" gun. It was made sometime in the '40s.
Unless someone here knows more about this than I do I wouldn't value it at much more than $150 as a shooter. You could still fire .38 S&Ws through it but I would have zero interest in it myself.
Last edited by twaits; 04-13-2011 at 10:08 AM.
|
04-13-2011, 10:05 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Enterprise, Alabama
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 1
Liked 1,166 Times in 346 Posts
|
|
Victory or Pre Victory .38 S&W sent to England during the Lend-Lease era. Converted to .38 S&W and reimported back to the USA.
Only worth about $200 and its only value is as a shooter.
Thom Braxton
SWCA #1474
|
04-13-2011, 10:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SW CT
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 2,535
Liked 3,024 Times in 950 Posts
|
|
I think that you have a Lend Lease gun. It was chambered for the 38/200 round and probably had a 5" barrel. The serial number will be on the bottom of the grip frame. This will tell a bit more. The name on the side was the company that converted it to 38spl, probably cut the barrel and refinished it in blue.
As for value, not all to much
I type slow....
|
04-13-2011, 10:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 479
Likes: 107
Liked 116 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Thanks guys for the fast replies. Yea, I assumed it wasn't worth a whole lot. So, he won't be getting my Glock 30 for it.
The things people come up with to trade guns is amazing. I posted my Glock in a local forum to trade for a "nice" Smith revolver, and this popped up.
|
04-13-2011, 10:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
|
|
Hard to imagine someone coming up with a less appealing Smith trade than that one.Even the triggerguard looks distorted in the second pic...that's after you stop looking at the scaley trigger.
Last edited by Camster; 04-13-2011 at 10:22 AM.
|
04-13-2011, 10:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 808
Likes: 247
Liked 189 Times in 102 Posts
|
|
You guys are a lot more generous than I would be. $75.00 TOPS as far as I'm concerned. Of course I wouldn't give $75-80 for Mod 10's when that's what they sold for either.
|
04-13-2011, 11:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 21
Likes: 153
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
A small but interesting point: The outfit which did the conversion work of the OP's S&W should read 'Cogswell & Harrison'. They were a famous London maker of British 'best' double (shot)guns. I believe that the British double gun trade had fallen on hard times by the time of the Great Depression. The British (double) Gun Trade also stopped producing sporting guns during WWII and instead produced military parts, such as rifle sights, etc. This positioned them to find related work after WWII such as the conversion of British Government surplus S&W Victory Models. Several famous London gun firms would fail in the 1950s and 1960s.
|
04-13-2011, 01:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 479
Likes: 107
Liked 116 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deltazulu334
A small but interesting point: The outfit which did the conversion work of the OP's S&W should read 'Cogswell & Harrison'. They were a famous London maker of British 'best' double (shot)guns. I believe that the British double gun trade had fallen on hard times by the time of the Great Depression. The British (double) Gun Trade also stopped producing sporting guns during WWII and instead produced military parts, such as rifle sights, etc. This positioned them to find related work after WWII such as the conversion of British Government surplus S&W Victory Models. Several famous London gun firms would fail in the 1950s and 1960s.
|
Interesting info, thanks. I wasn't 100% sure of the name on it, I just blew up the pic and tried to decipher it to the best my aging eyes could do.
|
04-13-2011, 06:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Maine
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 47
Liked 621 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
I just found one exactly like this..I mean EXACTLY on Gunbroker. They want $375 for it. Good luck with that.
Anyway, the cylinder on the one on GB looks to be a reddish color. I wonder if the company that converted it changed the cylinder to .38 spl as well? I can't post a link to it here but hopefully I'm not in violation by posting the auction number. Its 224734299
|
04-13-2011, 07:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Siiiiggghhhhh....
Another butchered Victory Model. Breaks my heart.
|
04-13-2011, 08:52 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 5,202
Likes: 1,048
Liked 6,619 Times in 1,535 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50
You guys are a lot more generous than I would be. $75.00 TOPS as far as I'm concerned. Of course I wouldn't give $75-80 for Mod 10's when that's what they sold for either.
|
I am with you on your price estimate. That gun has no collector value and is not a shooter in my opinion as it will swell or split the cases unless the cylinder was replaced.
__________________
John. SWCA #1586
|
09-22-2012, 09:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Believe it or not those C&H conversions are consistently pulling $325+. I certainly don't agree, and I'd buy one at a lower price just to round out my WWII group but....................
W.
|
09-22-2012, 09:19 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Does anyone know if the C&H conversions are properly dimensioned for the 38 Spl? Either sleeved or replacement cylinders?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-22-2012, 09:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sadly, Seattle WA
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 22,894
Liked 10,349 Times in 4,292 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waidmann
Believe it or not those C&H conversions are consistently pulling $325+. I certainly don't agree, and I'd buy one at a lower price just to round out my WWII group but....................
W.
|
Well, good for them and I hope they get their price, but it ain't comin' out of my pocket!
__________________
Even older, even crankier....
|
09-22-2012, 10:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
I have read that the C&H conversions were well done, and the cylinders were sleeved instead of just running a .38 Special chambering reamer into the .38 S&W chambers, which was the most common conversion method. I would think it might be possible to visually detect the presence of sleeves. The front sight in the picture would not be original.
Were that the case, I'd expect the value to be a bit more than the majority which were simply reamed chambers. By the way, a long time ago I had such a reamed-out .38/200, and I never had any incidents in which a case split occurred while using .38 Special ammunition, and in fact it shot reasonably well, despite the allegedly oversized bore. I have read stories about .38 Special cases splitting in these converted revolvers, but I am not so sure that was ever a problem. Just my personal experience.
|
09-22-2012, 11:17 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
DWalt,
I suppose there were some sloppy chamber ream jobs that could have split cases. But the chambers in my Smiths, 38 Spl and 38 S&W only differ by .003". The rounds themselves differ by .008". So the 38 Spl chambers of my new gun are looser for the spl than the 38 S&W chambers are for the 38 S&W cartridges.
Guess it's a case by case issue since. These things can tend to get a little more notoriety than deserved.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-23-2012, 12:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
I have heard of others who can easily chamber .38 S&W in a (non-converted) .38 Special revolver. There are manufacturing tolerances for both chamber and ammunition diameters, and I can see that a .38 Special chamber on the high end of the diameter tolerance might easily accommodate a .38 S&W cartridge having a diameter on the low end of the tolerance.
On the other hand, I have also experienced case splits when using the correct ammunition in a revolver. Possibly brass could have been a little brittle from age or exposure.
Last edited by DWalt; 09-23-2012 at 12:10 PM.
|
09-23-2012, 12:46 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,795
Likes: 18,509
Liked 22,391 Times in 8,268 Posts
|
|
Yes, some 38 S&W can chamber in a 38 Special. A friend who is reloader claims he didn't realize the difference between the two. He was at the range one day and was shooting up a box he had of the 38 S&W, but in a Mod 10, and was complaining about the 5 or 6 rounds that were too fat to fit the chambers. I explained to him the difference, and he told me he had reloaded some S&W the cases previously in standard 38 Special dies and standard 158 gr. .358 bullets, just a lighter load. I guess that would work if full length resized.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|