Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961
o

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:03 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)

Dear Forum - This post refers to the same modified revolver I posed questions for in the 'Smithing' area - I have questions about the identity that you may be able to help with. The serial number (45157) and the smooth fore and back straps suggest a prewar heavy duty, but the top of the frame at the frame to barrel transition looks more like an Outdoorsman. Also, it appears that the gun featured adjustable sights that were replaced with modern ones. The adjustable sights appear to contradict the smooth backstrap (I believe they were serrated on the Outdoorsman). Any suggestions as to what this started out as? I can provide more photos if necessary. Any assistance will be appreciated.




Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:24 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
Default

Well, it's a prewar frame that has been modified to accept a Model 57 barrel and, presumably, cylinder -- though the original cylinder might have been bored out from .38 to .41 caliber.

That serial number is right in the middle of a cluster of .38/44 Heavy Duty revolvers, so that's a reasonable origin guess. But it is at least theoretically possible that this frame was originally on a .455 HE, as there was some serial number overlap between the models.

The top of the frame has been channeled in order to accept a postwar micrometer click sight, and the area in front of the sight has been grooved to match the rib on the later barrel. This was not an adjustable-sight revolver at its time of manufacture.

The stocks are from a third era -- those are 1920s service stocks. Do they have a number stamped or penciled inside them? And do you see the serial number stamped on the back face of the cylinder?
__________________
David Wilson

Last edited by DCWilson; 04-21-2011 at 02:12 PM. Reason: Add cylinder SN question.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:29 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,409 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

The cylinder looks too short to be a 41 Magnum. Does 41 ammo actually fit? I assume the cylinder is not counterbored? Likely the original 38 Special unit rebored.

Somebody sure spent a lot of money/did a lot of work on this thing.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 04-21-2011, 02:15 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

In answer to your questions: The cylinder is numbered to the gun, as is the yoke. The cylinder has been bored to accept a .41 cartridge. The stocks are not original to the gun (the gun was fitted with large target-style magnas), are not numbered and appear to be mismatched, as the left has a large gold medallion while the other is plain. The work appears to be well done, but I can find virtually nothing on a 38-44 to 41 conversion. I would really like to know who did the work, but there is no information and nothing on the frame that provides a clue. DC - You indicate that the frame was modified to accept the Model 57 barrel: what issues might I encounter trying to refit a stock 38-44 barrel as part of a conversion back to the original caliber (I have a 38-44 cylinder)? The other option is to use it in a .41 special configuration - I would think that the 38-44 cylinder would handle the pressure (?) Thanks to all for the information.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2011, 02:50 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,409 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

I recall back in the 1960s Skeeter Skelton, Elmer Keith and others were calling for a 41 Special for police use. The 41 Magnum was S&W's response which was not what they wanted. They complained that this caliber was too powerful for the intended purpose and they were right.

After the 41 Magnum was released several gun writers embarked on creating the 41 Special of their dreams, modifying guns into the new caliber. I bet this gun was built during this time, the owner inspired by what he read in the magazines. I assume that full-length 41 Magnums will not fit the chambers and cases must be shortened? This makes it a hand-load only proposition.

At this point, the cost of doing anything with this gun will be very high and the end result will likely be less than fully satisfying. If it were mine, I would leave it as is and appreciate it as a piece of Americana. I would load shortened 41 brass to no more than 1000 FPS with 210 grain bullets and shoot it. Nobody at the range will say they have one just like it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:07 PM
Rugskipper's Avatar
Rugskipper Rugskipper is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 814
Likes: 98
Liked 159 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaxonPig View Post
Nobody at the range will say they have one just like it.
Amen to that! It sure is the first 5 screw .41 I've ever seen. I also agree with SP that the loads should probably be kept on the light side.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2011, 04:51 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Actually, the cylinder is long enough for the .41 magnum cartridge, but I am not inclined to be the first to test fire it with that (I can't tell if it was ever fired in its current configuration). There is some .41 special ammunition available in the loading you describe, so I may try that. Thanks again for the information and advice, it's very much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2011, 07:22 PM
David LaPell's Avatar
David LaPell David LaPell is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,774 Times in 1,312 Posts
Default

You can look up online the .41 Special loading data that John Taffin worked up. I just loaded some .41 Special's earlier today, the brass was shortened and I used some wheel weight cast 215 grain SWC's and 13.0 grains of 2400, this should give you a 1000 or so fps load. I have shot alot of these out of my .41 Magnum revolvers and the recoil is very pleasant. Starline once in a while sells some .41 Special marked and already made brass.
__________________
Vaya con Dios
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2011, 12:45 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Thanks again - One additional question: Since the cylinder accepts the magnum cartridges, would a load such as a 41 magnum "cowboy action load" be reasonable to use for plinking? There is some available with a 235 gr RNFP bullet @ 875 fps.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2011, 12:52 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is online now
SWCA Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 917
Liked 6,392 Times in 1,311 Posts
Default

As far as I know, the frames for 38/44's were identical, and in fact the
same, as the frames for a 44 caliber. Ie, the only difference was the
bore of the barrel, and the chambering in the cylinder. So, your gun
should be able to handle any cartridge that is no more powerful
than a 44 special.

Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-22-2011, 03:11 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
DC - You indicate that the frame was modified to accept the Model 57 barrel: what issues might I encounter trying to refit a stock 38-44 barrel as part of a conversion back to the original caliber (I have a 38-44 cylinder)?
I haven't taken a micrometer to the barrel rib width and height of the models involved, so I am just assuming that postwar ribbed N-frame barrels all start out from the same barrel blanks. If you got a postwar .38-44 barrel (Numrich still has them in the white), I would expect the rib on the new barrel to match the channel in your modified frame. But if it's off by a couple of thousandths of an inch, you'll have a discontinuity that could potentially bother you a lot. I don't know if the groove counts on top of the rib are consistent from model to model.

All ribbed postwar Outdoorsman barrels are 6.5 inches long; you'd have to cut the replacement and remount the front sight to end up with a .38 version of what you have now.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-22-2011, 04:12 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Thanks for the information David - I have obtained a 6.5 inch post-war 38-44 barrel - it is described as a pre model 23, so it has the top rib and Outdoorsman style front sight. I'll see how it matches up with the frame. Regarding the potential discontinuities that might be bothersome: are they merely cosmetic issues, or could they affect the integrity of the gun?
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-22-2011, 05:15 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer View Post
As far as I know, the frames for 38/44's were identical, and in fact the
same, as the frames for a 44 caliber. Ie, the only difference was the
bore of the barrel, and the chambering in the cylinder. So, your gun
should be able to handle any cartridge that is no more powerful
than a 44 special.

Mike Priwer
Thanks Mike - Please bear with me, as I am not savvy regarding handloading: What specifically determines the 'power' of the cartridge - is it a matter of pressure, or just the bullet weight and velocity? With regard to the 41, I'm trying to understand the difference between a cut down case loaded to subsonic velocities as opposed to a standard 41 magnum loaded for subsonic velocities (aka, the 'Cowboy' load). Does the case length come into play here? Can you or others please elaborate on the difference? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-22-2011, 06:03 PM
2152hq 2152hq is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,727
Likes: 1,633
Liked 9,099 Times in 3,366 Posts
Default

I posted some comments in the Gunsmithing section on this. I hadn't seen this thread and the photos.

I mentioned that the front, top portion of the frame had to have been built up either by welding or even perhaps brazing. Then recontoured to accept the much wider bbl rib of the M57 bbl. The OD frame has a much narrower flat in that area to join the same width rib on the bbl.
A HeavyDuty has a lower rounded shape with a bevel cut to the front edge so some work would need to have been done using a HD also.

A nickle plating job nicely covers either welding or brazing/silver soldering work from any color mismatch that bluing would show.
There does appear to be a pit in the frame contour on the top, right in one of the pics.

My advice was to procede slowly and rethink what you may be doing, not knowing who or how the work was done.
Refitting a M23 bbl will require that area to be re-contoured back to fit the narrow rib and you'll be cutting into that custom welded/brazed/built up area.

It may be quite sound and safe. It could be an inclusion filled area. The bbl threads in the frame should have been protected during the work.
Tough to tell from here. Just some thoughts..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-22-2011, 06:16 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
Thanks for the information David - I have obtained a 6.5 inch post-war 38-44 barrel - it is described as a pre model 23, so it has the top rib and Outdoorsman style front sight. I'll see how it matches up with the frame. Regarding the potential discontinuities that might be bothersome: are they merely cosmetic issues, or could they affect the integrity of the gun?
Mike
Mike, I'm going to defer to 2152hq on this one. It sounds like he has been able to do some physical comparisons that I have not.

But I will express the suspicion that turning this gun back into a fairly normal .38/44 would be more expensive than just buying one that has never been reconfigured.

Anyway, even if the gun is not factory original, isn't there a high coolness factor to having the world's only known .41/44 Outdoorsman?
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 04-22-2011, 06:36 PM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99
[...] What specifically determines the 'power' of the cartridge - is it a matter of pressure, or just the bullet weight and velocity? With regard to the 41, I'm trying to understand the difference between a cut down case loaded to subsonic velocities as opposed to a standard 41 magnum loaded for subsonic velocities (aka, the 'Cowboy' load). Does the case length come into play here? Can you or others please elaborate on the difference? Thanks.
Mike,
"Power" is usually estimated based on bullet weight and velosity or bullet kenetic energy but "power" wasn't the best choice of words. You're interested in how much stress the cylinder and frame can take and the best number for that is chamber pressure. Generally, a larger volume case can drive a given bullet faster than a smaller volume case at the same pressure or attain the same velosity at lower pressure.

There are factory loaded .41 magnums available that produce lower pressure than hunting or full power cartridges, but not necessarily low enough pressure to be advisable for your gun. I don't know what pressure limit is advisable or the pressure of down loaded factory cartridges but there is a good chance that cowboy loads are sold for .41 mag. they would have the least pressure. If it were mine, I'd have a worry free fun time firing home cast 200 to 220gr. bullets at about 800 fps. Cowboy loads are usually assembled to produce very low recoil and may have even lower pressure.

I like skillfully crafted old project guns that made sense in their day but make no sense when viewed from today's perspective. This one appears to have been skillfully crafted and I can understand why it would have been done in the early 1970s when used 29s readilly sold for 75% over msr and used 57s only fetched $50-$75 less, but they should have at least used a 28 or 27 frame. Maybe the owner who modified it did the conversion themselves using what they had on hand and knowing its strength limitation, enjoyed it for their lifetime firing low pressure reloads. That makes sense, but this gun makes no sense to me for a non-reloader.

Best Regards,
Gil

Last edited by k22fan; 04-22-2011 at 06:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-22-2011, 07:24 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I deeply appreciate all the information that forum members have provided, and the advice is certainly appreciated and not lost on me. At this juncture, it seems that the best path going forward is to consider shooting the gun with reduced pressure 41 cartridges - I still have some questions regarding using reduced 41 magnum loads versus 41 special loads, and will carefully consider the options and do the homework. If only I could elicit a response as to who did the original work - but to date, that info is not available. The benefit of belonging to this forum goes without saying.
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-22-2011, 10:17 PM
1-1917 1-1917 is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Center Point, Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 51
Liked 407 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer View Post
As far as I know, the frames for 38/44's were identical, and in fact the
same, as the frames for a 44 caliber. Ie, the only difference was the
bore of the barrel, and the chambering in the cylinder. So, your gun
should be able to handle any cartridge that is no more powerful
than a 44 special.
Mike Priwer

Could the frames metallurgy have bee altered through the milling and brazing? Pretty cool revolver any way you slice it.
__________________
Go West young man..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-23-2011, 12:58 AM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99
[...] I still have some questions regarding using reduced 41 magnum loads versus 41 special loads, [...] Mike
I believe there are still no industry standards for .41 special and it is still a wildcat. I've seen them built on L frames, GP-100s, and large single actions. You would have to ask whoever is selling .41 special cartridges what size gun their's are intedned to be safe in or what pressure they load to.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-23-2011, 02:06 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

You have asked a couple times so I will offer my $.02 worth. I see no advantage in loading/shooting "41 Specials" over down loaded or cowboy loads in 41 Magnum cases. The bother and expense of finding 41 Special brass would eliminate that choice for me. Just be sure a factory or heavy handload 41 Mag never finds its way into your revolver. You might get away with it for a while (or the original owner might have) but at some point it could let go and cause serious injury. (YMMV)

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 06-20-2018, 05:57 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default Update

Hello All - Realizing this post is really old, just thought I'd provide an update. Finally obtained some .41 Special Ammunition from Reed's RAR - specifically the button-nose wadcutter in 205 Grain at 950fps. No issues with this load. Have ordered some HSM Cowboy Action .41 Magnum (210 grain@969fps) - will see how this works (proceeding with caution). Welcome any comments! Mike. PS - The conversion was done long ago - found its way to me. I would much rather have the original!

Last edited by Mike99; 06-21-2018 at 12:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:14 PM
CScott's Avatar
CScott CScott is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: N. New Mexico
Posts: 422
Likes: 1,715
Liked 632 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
Hello All - Realizing this post is really old, just thought I'd provide an update. Finally obtained some .41 Special Ammunition from Reed's RAR - specifically the button-nose wadcutter in 205 Grain at 950fps. No issues with this load. Have ordered some HSM Cowboy Action .41 Magnum (210 grain@969fps) - will see how this works (proceeding with caution). I understand that this conversion of a S&W 38/44 HD is an atrocity, but it is what I am left with. Welcome any comments! Mike.
I wouldn't call it an "atrocity". Anomaly may be more like it. I'd leave it as is and shoot the devil out of it! Good time to learn to reload too. You'll never regret it.
Have fun with it,
Scott
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #23  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:24 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Smile

Hey Scott - Thanks for the comment - actually, the work was well done - my reference was more to lament the conversion of such a classic revolver. Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-22-2018, 02:54 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is online now
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 5,859
Liked 9,270 Times in 3,479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
...I have fired .41 Special loads (205 grain @950 fps) successfully with no signs of overpressure issues. My question is with regard to using .41 Magnum cowboy loads (210 grain @969 fps) in the revolver. Are there significant pressure differences between the two cartridges which would make using the cowboy loads more unsafe? Disclaimer for all opinions...Mike.
.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
Finally obtained some .41 Special Ammunition from Reed's RAR - specifically the button-nose wadcutter in 205 Grain at 950fps. No issues with this load. Have ordered some HSM Cowboy Action .41 Magnum (210 grain@969fps) - will see how this works (proceeding with caution).
The first quote, from your other thread, seems to be able to be answered with the additional info in this one. Call or email HSM & Reed's to find out what pressure their's are loaded to. Otherwise it's only a guess, not knowing how they're loaded. Either cartidge can be loaded over 30K psi.

You said you didn't see any signs of overpressure with the 41 Specials but any potential overpressure problem is with the gun, not the cartridge, so you won't see it until it's too late, right?

.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day

Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 06-22-2018 at 02:55 AM. Reason: .
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #25  
Old 06-22-2018, 02:20 PM
jebstuart's Avatar
jebstuart jebstuart is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
Default

I would much rather have this "atrocity" than any .36 caliber heavy frame. But I'm a forty-one fan from way back. I think this thing is great. If you decide to unload it cheap, give me a shot at it.
__________________
Jeb
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 06-22-2018, 03:24 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebstuart View Post
I would much rather have this "atrocity" than any .36 caliber heavy frame. But I'm a forty-one fan from way back. I think this thing is great. If you decide to unload it cheap, give me a shot at it.
Thanks Jeb - I will keep that in mind. I guess I used a poor term - I didn't mean that the build itself is an 'atrocity' - actually it was very well done. Just that such a modification of a classic S&W is not well thought of by many collectors. Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-25-2018, 05:25 PM
1Aspenhill's Avatar
1Aspenhill 1Aspenhill is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
Default

I would say it started out as a 5" 38/44 Heavy Duty. One number off this one went to a PD in Ohio. Is there a "B" stamped on the right grip frame? If so this gun started life as a blue gun. Possibly this is a PD gun that had seen it's better days when whoever bought it decided to do the modifications you see here. My 2 cents.
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 06-25-2018, 06:03 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Aspenhill View Post
I would say it started out as a 5" 38/44 Heavy Duty. One number off this one went to a PD in Ohio. Is there a "B" stamped on the right grip frame? If so this gun started life as a blue gun. Possibly this is a PD gun that had seen it's better days when whoever bought it decided to do the modifications you see here. My 2 cents.
I'll bet you are right on with this hunch. Yes, there is a 'B' at the bottom of the right grip frame. Thanks for your insight - had not considered that this might be a PD revolver...makes me want to get a letter on it...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-25-2018, 10:00 PM
Doug M.'s Avatar
Doug M. Doug M. is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,445
Likes: 14,499
Liked 9,263 Times in 3,702 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike99 View Post
Hey Scott - Thanks for the comment - actually, the work was well done - my reference was more to lament the conversion of such a classic revolver. Mike.
*
Remember that this work was done a good 40+ years ago, long before the most prevalent of the type of collectors ofter seen today, especially those such as seen on this forum. Many guns were modified in ways that made complete sense to the person doing the work (or having it done). To most shooters, these guns were tools, and modifications were made for the problems to be solved, in a manner that satisfied the shooter.

I can't say I would want to shoot this with full power .41 Magnum loads, but that would usually be true. However, for a service or personal defense revolver, some load about 210-220 grains, probably a Keith SWC or something similar, going downrange around 850-1000 fps ... it would be outstanding.

While collectors are somewhat common on this forum, and more common now than 40-odd years ago ... they are still a modest niche of gun owners as far as I am aware. I only person I think of in that way ... and he still has mostly fighting guns like virtually everyone I know.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #30  
Old 06-25-2018, 10:54 PM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug M. View Post
*
Remember that this work was done a good 40+ years ago, long before the most prevalent of the type of collectors ofter seen today, especially those such as seen on this forum. Many guns were modified in ways that made complete sense to the person doing the work (or having it done). To most shooters, these guns were tools, and modifications were made for the problems to be solved, in a manner that satisfied the shooter.

I can't say I would want to shoot this with full power .41 Magnum loads, but that would usually be true. However, for a service or personal defense revolver, some load about 210-220 grains, probably a Keith SWC or something similar, going downrange around 850-1000 fps ... it would be outstanding.

While collectors are somewhat common on this forum, and more common now than 40-odd years ago ... they are still a modest niche of gun owners as far as I am aware. I only person I think of in that way ... and he still has mostly fighting guns like virtually everyone I know.
Very well said Doug. And point very well taken. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-26-2018, 12:23 AM
Mike99 Mike99 is offline
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 75
Likes: 14
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Once again, a wealth of valuable information from the members! Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-16-2021, 11:40 PM
vinn vinn is offline
Member
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 216
Likes: 430
Liked 86 Times in 67 Posts
Default

i have a 38/44. can the cylindar be bored out to 357 mag. vin
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-17-2021, 12:15 AM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is online now
US Veteran
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) 38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy)  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 88,960
Liked 24,780 Times in 8,482 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vinn View Post
i have a 38/44. can the cylindar be bored out to 357 mag. vin
Welcome to the Forum.

You would do better to start your own thread, rather than piggyback on this one that originally started 10 years ago and was last updated nearly three years ago.

Yes, it can be bored out. It destroys the collector value of your revolver. Is it safe to do so? I really don't know.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Tags
cartridge, chamber pressure, grooved, micrometer, model 57, n-frame, outdoorsman, postwar, prewar, ribbed, serrated, skeeter, skelton, starline, subsonic, transition, wildcat

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FINALLY, I found a Heavy Duty!!! (picture heavy duty) calmex S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 51 07-26-2014 12:27 PM
N Frame Relatives Photo Heavy MrTrolleyguy S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 04-04-2014 10:35 PM
Photo Heavy Grip Tutorial MrTrolleyguy The Lounge 2 01-14-2014 01:21 AM
Heavy Duty Photo Goony S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 07-05-2011 10:06 PM
Grips 'n Stuff (photo heavy) Speedo2 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 22 05-23-2010 03:49 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)