Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2020, 07:57 AM
Mrnurse Mrnurse is offline
Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: nc
Posts: 662
Likes: 689
Liked 861 Times in 389 Posts
Default Question on the 38/44

I Dont know much about them...are they based on a 44 Cal N frame Design? If so, one could assume it can take any 38 SPL Cal Powered ammo ( +P). When did they first produce the 38/44?. Love the fixed sights...like a Big Mdl 10, I NEVER use adj sights for my shooting needs. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2020, 08:03 AM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,841
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
Default

Yes, the .38/44 was originally a 3rd model N frame except chambered for .38 Special High Velocity cartridges. You could say the cartridge was a +P+ in its day. Not quite magnum but closer than .38 Special. It was developed around 1930 as a police gun used to penetrate the steel car bodies of the day. You can read more about it at https://38-44heavyduty.com.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629

Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 09-25-2020 at 08:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 09-25-2020, 09:36 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

Many have been reamed slightly to lengthen the chambers for .357 Mag and I've never heard of any ill effects. The cyls are heat treated. Of course that will negate any collector value.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2020, 10:27 AM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

As I recall, the story goes that in the late 1920s the phenomenon of the "Motor Bandits" sprang up. Armed robbers who would swoop in driving cars and make a fast getaway in the automobile. Often there would be running gunfights between cops and crooks careening down the road shooting at each other. Cars were made of thicker steel back then and the standard 38 and 44 revolvers of the day couldn't penetrate the car bodies. Cops asked for handguns that had more penetration.

Colt responded in 1929 with the 38 Super. They took the 1911 platform in the old 38 ACP and jacked it up from 1050 fps to 1300 with a pointed, fmj 130 grain bullet. S&W's answer was the 38/44 in 1930. This used a 158 lead slug at 1140 fops. The "Heavy Duty" was simply the 1926 Third Model 44 Hand Ejector made in 38 Special. The name reflects the 38 caliber built on a 44 frame.

Of course the introduction of the 357 Magnum in 1935 rendered the 38/44 obsolete. In 1955 the appearance of the K frame Combat Magnum totally killed the HD sales. Mine sat around the factory for 4 years before they finally shipped it to a police supply shop where it was likely sold at a discount to get it out of inventory.

The 38/44s were used by many police. I suspect mine was carried by a cop and I used to have a 4" HD that shipped to the Ft. Smith, AR PD.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 09-25-2020, 10:50 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,629
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrnurse View Post
I Dont know much about them...are they based on a 44 Cal N frame Design? If so, one could assume it can take any 38 SPL Cal Powered ammo ( +P).
And then some. The .38-44 cartridge (under several names) is simply an overloaded .38 Special which had factory ballistics of a MV around 1100 ft/sec, depending upon barrel length, as compared to around 800 ft/sec with the typical .38 Special. It hasn't been factory loaded since the 1970s by the big boys, but is still available from Buffalo Bore and Underwood. Or it can be easily duplicated by handloading. 2400 propellant seems to be the best choice, usually in the 11-12 grain range using a 158 grain bullet.

Last edited by DWalt; 09-25-2020 at 03:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 09-25-2020, 12:09 PM
Mrnurse Mrnurse is offline
Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: nc
Posts: 662
Likes: 689
Liked 861 Times in 389 Posts
Default

Thanks to all. Learning a little daily.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2020, 03:45 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

The 38-44 Ammo I have is full metal jacket like one of those above.

And as I recall law enforcement wanted something that would penetrate the engine block, not just the sheet metal.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 09-26-2020 at 03:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2020, 04:08 PM
Kinman's Avatar
Kinman Kinman is offline
Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,131
Likes: 10,413
Liked 6,945 Times in 2,355 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
The 38-44 Ammo I have is full metal jacket like of those above.

And as I recall law enforcement wanted something that would penetrate the engine block, not just the sheet metal.
As a kid learning to drive in Utah, urban legend had it thats why the Utah State Patrol carried .357 Magnums. Supposedly they carried armor piercing ammo for just such a situation, pull up alongside the perp who would not pull over and take out the engine block. No facts just urban legend that makes sense. I only had one friend that tried to outrun the State, he managed to pull away but ran out of gas before reaching Nevada...where the cops were waiting for him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2020, 05:05 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,629
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinman View Post
As a kid learning to drive in Utah, urban legend had it thats why the Utah State Patrol carried .357 Magnums. Supposedly they carried armor piercing ammo for just such a situation, pull up alongside the perp who would not pull over and take out the engine block. No facts just urban legend that makes sense. I only had one friend that tried to outrun the State, he managed to pull away but ran out of gas before reaching Nevada...where the cops were waiting for him.
Once upon a time, some cops did carry metal penetrating handgun ammo (available in several calibers) but it wasn't armor piercing, or even close. There were two basic MP bullet designs. Winchester (and Western) MP bullets were not much different from ordinary FMJ bullets except they had a conical nose, and the jacket in the nose section was very thick, the better to penetrate auto glass and body metal without expanding or breaking up. Penetrating engine blocks was not part of their purpose. But no doubt that an engine might well be fatally damaged by a hit in the right location. The Remington MP bullet version used a lightweight die-casting Zinc alloy bullet (that alloy was called Zamak), driven at high velocity, but it was intended for the same purpose - penetrating auto bodies and glass while hanging together. Later on, in the late 1960s, there was another player in the LE penetrating bullet game called KTW. There were two KTW bullet styles (that I know of). One used a jacketed bullet with a tungsten carbide core, the other used a solid bronze (or brass) alloy bullet. Some were coated with a green Teflon coating, which was more for cosmetic effect than serving any ballistic purpose. They quickly became called "Cop Killer Bulets" despite the fact that there is no known instance of any cops being killed with them. They didn't stay on the market long.

Last edited by DWalt; 09-25-2020 at 07:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 09-25-2020, 07:50 PM
StrawHat's Avatar
StrawHat StrawHat is online now
SWCA Member
Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,754 Times in 4,037 Posts
Default

I find it interesting that rather than introducing a new cartridge, both Colt a d S&W merely upgraded existing cartridges with few problems.

Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-26-2020, 03:42 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinman View Post
I only had one friend that tried to outrun the State, he managed to pull away but ran out of gas before reaching Nevada...where the cops were waiting for him.
Sounds like that old movie: "Vanishing Point". I think he was driving a Hemi 'Cuda.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-26-2020, 03:47 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44 Question  on  the  38/44  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt View Post
Some were coated with a green Teflon coating, which was more for cosmetic effect than serving any ballistic purpose.
Not cosmetic, the purpose was color coding for quick identification. Like the different military bullet colors for tracers and metal piercing.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for attorney type people - NOT a legal question... Ματθιας The Lounge 23 06-13-2020 09:43 PM
Question About Smith Model 360PD Scandium/Titanium Question Rhetorician S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 03-28-2015 09:25 AM
Nickel Baby Chief: W/Photos: New Question: Question Answered WCCPHD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 29 01-26-2015 11:31 PM
Taurus Brand Question: An Honest Question? Rhetorician Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 108 12-21-2014 11:23 AM
Question about a Ladysmith 60LS .357 mag 2 1/8" - A Christmas Present for my Wife that came into my FFL. I have a recoil question and a couple of other questions to anyone that has one of these! .460V & XVR Magnum Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 35 09-24-2014 09:19 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)