Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961
o

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:28 PM
CptCurl's Avatar
CptCurl CptCurl is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,282 Times in 910 Posts
Default They Placed 1st. and 2nd.

Bottom a 1st. Model .44 Hand Ejector

Top a 2nd. Model .455 Hand Ejector



On the bench this evening, clean. Candid hand-held shot. I just couldn't resist sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:43 PM
fat tom's Avatar
fat tom fat tom is offline
Absent Comrade
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central South Carolina
Posts: 7,215
Likes: 6,581
Liked 12,383 Times in 2,810 Posts
Default

Very nice. Thanks for the pics!
f.t.
__________________
South Carolina-God's country
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:45 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
Default

The guns are great and the wood is spectacular. Nice!
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:07 PM
bob1956 bob1956 is offline
US Veteran
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southern maine
Posts: 636
Likes: 1,381
Liked 527 Times in 221 Posts
Default

Those are the smiths dreams are made of!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:46 PM
tops's Avatar
tops tops is online now
Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC, Yadkin County
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 25,461
Liked 8,521 Times in 3,188 Posts
Default

Super nice. Thanks for posting. It gives me something to work towards. Larry
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:51 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,014
Likes: 7,107
Liked 48,569 Times in 9,219 Posts
Default

Gorgeous.
With dished grips, the 44 should be early.
Please tell us what number range.
Is it lettered?
Ironic that the 455 lacks proofs, and the 44 appears to be Brit proofed.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-26-2012, 02:02 AM
CptCurl's Avatar
CptCurl CptCurl is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,282 Times in 910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
Gorgeous.
With dished grips, the 44 should be early.
Please tell us what number range.
Is it lettered?
Ironic that the 455 lacks proofs, and the 44 appears to be Brit proofed.
The .455 has no proofs or martial marks at all. Nor does it have any import marks. It clearly was made for commercial release and bears a fairly late S/N. I displayed it in a prior post:

S&W .455 Mk. II Hand Ejector 2nd Model #69234

The .44 bears S/N 15. It has no martial marks. As you note, it bears British commercial proofs. It was proofed at the Birmingham Proof House in 1952.

I suspect the .44 has a story to tell if I can make it talk. The British civilian proofs add a lot of spice and speak for a part of its life. A factory letter is certainly to be called for. As I learn more I expect to share the information. This just came into my hands in the past day. There will be photography to display.

Thanks for the comments, folks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:29 AM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,014
Likes: 7,107
Liked 48,569 Times in 9,219 Posts
Default

15
COOL. I'm guessing there aren't many lower.


On the 455-
It is hard to sell 70,000 guns and not have stuff left over. When the Brits were done, S&W assembled everything they could in an easy manner and dumped them. Oddly, Shapleigh in St. Louis took a lot, maybe most, of the leftover 455's. Maybe they were well known enough to sell them into the Commonwealth, or maybe they were just "gun-starved" through WW I. Maybe they figured if they could do nothing else, they could punch them out to 45 Colt and move them.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:18 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
Default

I wonder if the .44 was an inspection copy offered to the British Military by S&W in hopes of generating interest in a bulk sale.

Or possibly the British, having heard that a new heavy frame revolver was in development at S&W, placed an early order for one (or more?) to check out.

Seems to me this gun absolutely demands a letter. Please keep us posted on what you may learn about it.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:31 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,014
Likes: 7,107
Liked 48,569 Times in 9,219 Posts
Default

Nope.
The Brits requested samples in 455 in the summer of 1914, and S&W quickly sent them.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:34 PM
CptCurl's Avatar
CptCurl CptCurl is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,282 Times in 910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post

15
COOL. I'm guessing there aren't many lower.

14 maybe?

Seriously, is there any information on how the prototypes were numbered, what was the lowest numbered example that would be considered "regular production", and whether any very early numbers were reserved for high-hats?

This 1st. Model differs from the norm in that it has no provision for a lanyard loop. In fact, the serial number is stamped right in the center of the butt where the hole for the lanyard loop normally is located.

If this one would be classified as "regular production" I would surmise it was among the very first batch to go through production. I wonder, how many went through production at a time?

This weekend I'll take some time to carefully photograph this revolver, and ultimately I will display it in detail on the S&W forum.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:51 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,014
Likes: 7,107
Liked 48,569 Times in 9,219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptCurl View Post
This 1st. Model differs from the norm in that it has no provision for a lanyard loop. In fact, the serial number is stamped right in the center of the butt where the hole for the lanyard loop normally is located.
Swivels were not "normal" on TL's.
The Brit 455's had them, but most other calibers are usually seen without them.
S&W would put a swivel on anything if you ordered it, but they did not stick it on normal productions.
The misleading factor here is the high number of 44-2nd's seen with swivels. That is merely because they're built on leftover 1917 frames. They also had plenty of leftover swivels, so it was cheaper to stick a swivel on than plug and polish the hole.

Maybe Ed will come along and show you pics of #2.
I think DB gave it to him personally.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:46 AM
CptCurl's Avatar
CptCurl CptCurl is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,282 Times in 910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post

Maybe Ed will come along and show you pics of #2.
I think DB gave it to him personally.
That's interesting! Does somebody on the forum have #2? I would love to see it and any other examples "lower than 15."

What about #1? Is it known to exist?

Thanks to all. I'm gathering an education.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-28-2012, 07:21 PM
Sebago Son's Avatar
Sebago Son Sebago Son is offline
Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,724 Times in 1,862 Posts
Lightbulb Shapliegh New Century Guns...

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
15
COOL. I'm guessing there aren't many lower.


On the 455-
It is hard to sell 70,000 guns and not have stuff left over. When the Brits were done, S&W assembled everything they could in an easy manner and dumped them. Oddly, Shapleigh in St. Louis took a lot, maybe most, of the leftover 455's. Maybe they were well known enough to sell them into the Commonwealth, or maybe they were just "gun-starved" through WW I. Maybe they figured if they could do nothing else, they could punch them out to 45 Colt and move them.
I've put these snapshots up before, but this is one such .455 HE1st that shipped to Shapleigh between Christmas 1917 and New Years 1918.















This one remains in .455



Drew
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 01-28-2012, 07:42 PM
Sebago Son's Avatar
Sebago Son Sebago Son is offline
Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,724 Times in 1,862 Posts
Default And while we're on the subject.....

This .455 HE2nd was factory converted from .455 to .45 Colt in May of 1936.











Again, apologies for the recycled photos...

Drew

Last edited by Sebago Son; 01-28-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 01-28-2012, 08:20 PM
JSR III's Avatar
JSR III JSR III is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,575
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,924 Times in 3,545 Posts
Default

Drew, 'really cool. You have both the revolver and the ammunition with the factory rework stars on them.

CaptCrl, remember that S&W did not necessarily ship in numerical sequence. 15 could very possibly have shipped before number 1 and the only way to tell is to letter the gun. Dr. Cornett may be along shortly to discuss purchasing this from you...
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-29-2012, 10:30 AM
CptCurl's Avatar
CptCurl CptCurl is offline
SWCA Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,282 Times in 910 Posts
Default

To cross-link the threads, here's a link to the thread in which I posted detailed photographs of my First Model pictured in the opening post:

S&W .44 Hand Ejector 1st Model #15
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-06-2017, 02:02 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

Lee posted a comment above about Serial No. 2 I once had. It is caliber .45 S&W Special , aka .45 Frankfort. I believe it was one of the test guns built for the 1906 Army trials. That would mean there are ( or were) three T-Locks with serial number 2. - standard production in .44S&W, plus one in .455 Eley for the British contract and then the gun in .45 Special caliber. Ed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 04-06-2017, 04:11 PM
Dillyp's Avatar
Dillyp Dillyp is offline
Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bakersville NC
Posts: 402
Likes: 279
Liked 703 Times in 162 Posts
Default

45 S&W special? Elaborate please. Ill wait.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-07-2017, 01:08 AM
Cyrano's Avatar
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,581
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=CptCurl;136313511
Thanks to all. I'm gathering an education.[/QUOTE]

Every time I open this sub-forum, I'm getting an education.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-07-2017, 01:14 AM
Cyrano's Avatar
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,581
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
Default

Is '45 S&W Special, 45 Frankfort' the same as 45 M1909; the 45 Colt with a slightly enlarged rim diameter to aid in extraction? If not, what's the difference?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-07-2017, 01:39 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd. They Placed 1st. and 2nd.  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

The Army trials of 1906 to select a new military handgun & cartridge is described in many gun books. Too much to go into details here. Many gun makers ( Colt, Luger, Savage, S&W, etc. ) entered their handgun designs. S&W entered their new N frame .44 military design, aka " Triple Lock" in a new caliber to meet the trials specs. of .45 caliber. S&W called it the .45 S&W Special. Rounds are known with 4 different headstamps. Mostly made by Frankford Arsenal. I believe maybe two dozen, or so, guns were made up, of which two were submitted to the trials. One was destroyed in the rust test and the other was returned to S&W after the trials. Known Army records of the tests did not list serial numbers of the guns submitted. S&W did not win the competition. Originally S&W apparently planned to sell the guns commercially in .45 caliber, if they won the trials & were selected for the Army contract, and therefore made up a batch of boxes with the .45 Special labels, which are seen in collections today. How many of the .45 T-Locks were sold, or given away, I don't know, however I have personally observed two examples, Serial numbers 2 & 9. Ed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
Reply

Tags
colt, commercial, military, model 15, smith-wessonforum.com

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)