|
|
06-23-2012, 08:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Georgia
Posts: 336
Likes: 9
Liked 94 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Got a K-22 today!
I went to a local gun show with a couple of my shooting buddies and he found me a pretty nice K-22. It has honest wear, and it's wearing the wrong grips, but I've been wanting a long tube .22 for a while now. I got it for $500 OTD. It's a Model 17 (no dash) that dates to about 1960 per SCSW. Probably not as good of a deal as the K-38 a little while back, but I'm partial to the long barrels! If I feel up to it, I want to take it out and get it dirty tomorrow!
What do y'all think?
Rawhyde
17-0-Left-Side-web.jpg
17-0-Right-Side-web.jpg
Last edited by Rawhyde; 06-23-2012 at 09:17 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-23-2012, 09:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
Congratulations and if yours shoots anything like my 17-4 with 8 3/8 barrel it will blow your mind because shoots it like a rifle and is the most accurate model 17 I own.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-23-2012, 09:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 511
Liked 1,969 Times in 507 Posts
|
|
Yeah, technically those grips are "wrong" but not very - if you can do some trading for another set of targets with the diamond, even if you had to throw a little cash into the deal, then the gun would be right enough.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
|
06-23-2012, 10:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 31,497
Liked 22,512 Times in 4,626 Posts
|
|
Nice pick-up my friend and i hope it shoots as well for you as my k-22's shoot for me. I know it will. You will be wanting more of these now.
Trust me i know.
Chuck
__________________
They hold no Quarter
|
06-23-2012, 10:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central New York State
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 3,465
Liked 2,113 Times in 632 Posts
|
|
These revolvers tend to multiply. Very nice score.
|
06-23-2012, 11:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: In Ohio or Arizona
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Very nice indeed.
|
06-24-2012, 06:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Really nice!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmoose
These revolvers tend to multiply. Very nice score.
|
Yes they will!
Thanks,
Hoover
|
06-24-2012, 10:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Georgia
Posts: 336
Likes: 9
Liked 94 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
I have liked and respected S&W my entire life, but I wasn't that knowledgable about them. Back in the 80's, I learned of the existance of the Model 52 and Model 53. I was fascinated by the idea of a .38 Special match grade semi auto and the idea of a high speed .22 caliber centerfire. I thought they were cool concepts and it made me realize that S&W dared to be different.
A couple of years ago, I got back into shooting, reloading, and gun buying. I decided to learn more about Smith & Wesson, and concentrated my buying and studying accordingly.
I've read countless times how you have to take all reference books (even the great SCSW) with a grain of salt because S&W doesn't waste parts and they aren't afraid to make "deviations" to use up those parts.
That said, I looked into the SCSW about this new to me K-22.
K417xxx puts it into the mid to late 1960 timeframe numerically. I know they're shipped out of sequence and these are just generalities, but...
Looking into the Model 17 section, I learned that the 17 like all model marked guns began production in 1957. The long barrel began production in 1958. (Nothing contradictory...yet) According to SCSW, in 1959, the 17-1 was introduced, but mine is a plain Model 17 with a serial number deep into the 1960 range.
Between this and the K-38 I just picked up, I'm beginning to wonder if every gun they make is some sort of "exception to the rule". My guess is that not many people buy/like the 8-3/8" barrels, so that throws a monkey wrench into the works.
|
06-24-2012, 11:26 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 4,634
Likes: 2,805
Liked 4,156 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
|
I've posted the statement here before that the 8 & 3/8ths K-22 are the "sleeper" rimfires and by the prices I see on Gunbroker they've woke up!
That longer barrel in the 22 cal is a real shooter with the 40 gr standard velocity ammo.
I've got one about the same date as yours, I just put smooth targets on it and called it close enough.
GF
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|