|
|
11-08-2012, 05:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Is this a K-22 OD 2nd Model aka K-22/40
Advertised as a "K-22 2nd variation". The serial number 672xxx falls quite a bit earlier than the known range for K-22/40's and, if I understand the differences correctly, the rear sight looks like a 1st model.
Am I correct?
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
11-08-2012, 05:37 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 160
Likes: 123
Liked 59 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
You are correct. The Second Model had a click adjustable rear sight.
Ken
|
11-08-2012, 05:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,725 Times in 1,862 Posts
|
|
OD vs. K-22/40
First Model, Second Issue.
Here's the best way to visually tell the difference between the Outdoorman and the Masterpiece, Prewar, AKA: K-22/40 without cocking the action.... the OD is a long action gun and K-22/40 Masterpiece is a short action.
Note the sights..
K-22/40 is on top...
Drew
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-08-2012, 05:58 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebago Son
First Model, Second Issue.
Here's the best way to visually tell the difference between the Outdoorman and the Masterpiece, Prewar, AKA: K-22/40 without cocking the action.... the OD is a long action gun and K-22/40 Masterpiece is a short action.
Note the sights..
K-22/40 is on top...
Drew
|
Drew - thanks very much for taking the time to upload the pictures. I was pretty sure I had a good visual on the differences and your pictures confirmed it. Obviously the short action feature requires the gun to be "in hand". I pretty certain that my eyes would not be able to discern a long vs. short action from a picture of a cocked hammer!
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
11-08-2012, 06:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,725 Times in 1,862 Posts
|
|
Glad to do it!
BTW, here's a comparision between long vs. short action guns....
In this case, these are "N" frames.
Please pardon the poor lighting...
Drew
|
11-08-2012, 07:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 2,486
Liked 8,318 Times in 2,919 Posts
|
|
Dennis an easy way to tell the difference between a pre war OD and the pre war Masterpiece (22-40) from the profile is the visible step on the back of the short action K22-40 hammer ( below the spur ).
Another easy to spot feature is the "Micrometer" adjusting screws are much larger.
Perhaps what the seller was referring to is that the OD you posted above has the second style rear site with two set screws,
The first version had only one set screw and looked like the one pictured below.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 11-08-2012 at 07:55 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-08-2012, 08:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
Dennis an easy way to tell the difference between a pre war OD and the pre war Masterpiece (22-40) from the profile is the visible step on the back of the short action K22-40 hammer ( below the spur ).
Another easy to spot feature is the "Micrometer" adjusting screws are much larger.
Perhaps what the seller was referring to is that the OD you posted above has the second style rear site with two set screws,
The first version had only one set screw and looked like the one pictured below.
|
Thanks very much for the close up of the hammer step. I had read about that but never seen a close up like that before. The misunderstanding was mine regarding the sellers description of the gun and I interpreted his description incorrectly. Thanks to this post I now know definitively how to ID (or not) a K-22/40.
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-11-2012, 10:02 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nevada, USA section
Posts: 334
Likes: 343
Liked 126 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Here's a side by side comparsion which may help.
__________________
Dave
SWCA #2465
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-11-2012, 10:30 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Dennis,
The information and photos above are excellent. But as usual with S&W guns there is a caution: the stepped hammer identification of a 22/40 is not foolproof. Although not common, photos of 22/40 hammers w/o the step are reported and shown on this forum.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
11-11-2012, 11:42 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Dennis,
The information and photos above are excellent. But as usual with S&W guns there is a caution: the stepped hammer identification of a 22/40 is not foolproof. Although not common, photos of 22/40 hammers w/o the step are reported and shown on this forum.
|
Just when I think I've got it figured out.... Actually I have a real good mental picture of the rear sight profile thanks to this post! (though as the years pass by I find that having something in memory and being able to retrieve it are two different things )
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
11-12-2012, 10:20 AM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central South Carolina
Posts: 7,215
Likes: 6,581
Liked 12,383 Times in 2,810 Posts
|
|
Ain't that the truth? As it stands now,I've forgotten more than I currently remember.
f.t.
__________________
South Carolina-God's country
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-12-2012, 10:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I am the seller of the gun pictured and it is not a 2nd Model 22/40 its a 2nd issue/variation of the Pre War Outdoorsman (3 screw rear site) vs the early 2 screw rear site. My ad explains this but the buyer was confused, I suspect Bullmack was the person who contacted me. Thanks Rom
|
11-12-2012, 01:17 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rom
I am the seller of the gun pictured and it is not a 2nd Model 22/40 its a 2nd issue/variation of the Pre War Outdoorsman (3 screw rear site) vs the early 2 screw rear site. My ad explains this but the buyer was confused, I suspect Bullmack was the person who contacted me. Thanks Rom
|
It was me. I was confused. I am no longer. Dazed perhaps
Sometimes our cross-use of the terms issue/model/variation can be confusing.
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
11-12-2012, 07:51 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullmack
It was me. I was confused. I am no longer. Dazed perhaps
Sometimes our cross-use of the terms issue/model/variation can be confusing.
|
That's why it's important to clear up slang terminology on this forum so more people are informed rather than perpetuate confusion.
Accepted universal collector terminology is documented. There is no accurate source calling your gun a "2nd issue" or "K-22 2nd variation". It is a "K22 Outdoorsman 1st Model" with the updated sight, and could lead anyone, even knowledgeable in S&W to think of a "K22 Masterpiece, K22 2nd Model" (also factory labeled 22/40).
Anyone can be confused with 'pet' terminology often coined amongst some groups but meaningless and confusing to anyone outside of that circle. It just makes sense especially in a sale ad no matter the explaination where many readers could know nothing about S&Ws, that only documented terms in Smith sources should be used for someone to be able to look up. Particularly in this case where the distinguishing "upgrades" of importance both deal with the rear sight. Most call it the one screw elevation rear sight vs. the 2 screw rear sight.
There is so much erroneous information posted in sale ads how is one to know if the seller is knowledgeable or incorrect when obscure terms are used?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
11-12-2012, 08:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
What time frames did the hammers and firing pin change?
|
11-12-2012, 09:50 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Puget Sound, Washington
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 182
Liked 1,201 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Just to be clear I was the potential buyer. An email exchange with the seller quickly cleared up what the gun at auction actually was. At the same time I decided to started this post to educate myself on ID'ing the 22/40's. I should have done the education part months ago.
__________________
Dennis
SWCA #2409, SWHF #353
|
11-12-2012, 11:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 2,486
Liked 8,318 Times in 2,919 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Dennis,
The information and photos above are excellent. But as usual with S&W guns there is a caution: the stepped hammer identification of a 22/40 is not foolproof. Although not common, photos of 22/40 hammers w/o the step are reported and shown on this forum.
|
I believe every pre war short action K22-40 hammer has the step pictured above,
As I recall we did have one member post a picture of a pre war K22-40 with a micrometer rear site in the correct serial range but his revolver had a long action hammer ,
I believe one of our members proved that pre war short and long action hammers will interchange from the Outdoorsman into the Masterpiece frame and visa versa.
Also the owner purchased the gun used and did not know if the hammer had ever been replaced.
|
11-13-2012, 12:13 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 27,913
Liked 45,746 Times in 4,818 Posts
|
|
Pre War K-22 Masterpiece Hammer...
Here is the thread on the Masterpiece with the Outdoorsman style hammer (you'll have to decide for yourself if it is as it shipped from the factory...).
Pre-war K-22 Masterpiece value
BTW: I have SN 687594, that per Harvester's letter shipped with his gun and it has the "normal" K-22-40 stepped hammer.
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan
|
11-13-2012, 12:30 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog81mm
What time frames did the hammers and firing pin change?
|
The long throw hammer in the 22/38 changed to the short throw (stepped on K frame RF) hammer c.1940 with the introduction of the 22/40. All other models got the short throw hammer post war but with a transition period, the source of several desired models.
The improved hammer safety block was added post war to all guns; earlier for military issue like 1917s and Victorys.
Sorry I'm not sure of your meaning on the firing pin change. Pre and post war rimfires had the floating firing pin in the frame.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 11-13-2012 at 12:44 AM.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|