|
|
12-24-2012, 08:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
old J frame identification ?
Merry Christmas everyone. I have been offered a J frame that my limited knowledge can't identify. Please help with ident. and value. It a blue, 2 inch barrel , 5 screw (4 on side plate, 1 on front of trigger guard), 5 shot, chambered in 38 S&W. I can't find a model number in the crane recess. On the frame, in the crane recess, it has the number 88793. the same number is on the crane itself and on the rear face of the cyl. On the bottom of the butt is the number 71335. I don't know which is the ser. No. and what the other number signifies. The outside of the weapon is in about 90 % with one smallish impact mark on the bottom rear of butt. The barrel has some internal pitting as do the chambers. The action seems to work well Although the cyl. lockup is a tad loose. I was thinking of adding it to my small S&W collection even though it is an obsolete chambering. What do you guys think ? I appreciate any feedback.
|
12-24-2012, 09:10 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,782
Likes: 936
Liked 18,873 Times in 9,241 Posts
|
|
It's a .38/32 Terrier, later called the model 32. The number on the bottom of the grip frame makes it a post-WW II gun but prior to 1957. It is an Improved I frame, similar to but slightly smaller than the J. The 71335 should match the number on the rear cylinder face; the 88793 on the frame and yoke (crane) are factory internal codes used during assembly.
It would be a very unusual coincidence for the assembly and cylinder numbers to match if the cylinder was swapped out, so I would double-check that. With the pitted bore and chambers I think its value would be much lower than the surface finish seems to indicate.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Last edited by murphydog; 12-26-2012 at 01:07 AM.
|
12-24-2012, 09:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
You are correct the number on the butt and cyl. are the same. Do you have a range of value that I could use in dickering with the owner as he thinks that " It's old so it's valuable". Thanks for your help.
|
12-25-2012, 05:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: western Washington
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 1
Liked 763 Times in 454 Posts
|
|
Looks like 1949-1969, unfortunately the SCSW doesn't break it down any closer.
Last edited by hotrod150; 12-27-2012 at 01:06 PM.
|
12-25-2012, 11:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,616
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,608 Times in 3,452 Posts
|
|
Please!!!!! Eggs have yolks, S&W revolvers have yokes.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-26-2012, 12:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,724 Times in 1,862 Posts
|
|
Without a snapshot, it's gonna be tough to assign a value. However, if the finish is original and the stocks are correct, I think you wouldn't get hurt at about $300. But I wouldn't pay more unless you really liked the gun because you are getting close to the retail number. Get the box, tools and or papers and you can add a few bucks.
Oft times what looks like pitting can be removed and leave little indication that it was ever there.
|
12-26-2012, 01:07 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,782
Likes: 936
Liked 18,873 Times in 9,241 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Please!!!!! Eggs have yolks, S&W revolvers have yokes.
|
Sorry. Must have been the extra yokes in the egg nog .
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-26-2012, 09:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
Sorry. Must have been the extra yokes in the egg nog .
|
"Looks like the yoke's on you, son!"
To the OP, any evaluation using pictures involves some speculation; but without pictures it is pretty much total speculation, since descriptions are so subjective.
Froggie
|
12-26-2012, 12:29 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,362
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
The pitting and the weak ammo would cause me to pass.
Hold out for a .38 Special in better condition.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-30-2012, 10:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the feedback on the approx. value. The weapon is offered to me at $200.00 and seems like a good purchase to add to my small collection even with the annemic chambering. It's kind of a neat little piece. As ta mie bahd spelin, Ey ges tha yolks un mi. Ey'l yews spel cheker n tha fuetur.
|
12-31-2012, 04:17 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
A few of these I frame guns were sold in the late '40s mostly made up from prewar parts. Actual .38 S&W production in volume didn't resume until about 1950, with known #s 54804 and 58470 shipping in July 1951. With your serial and 5 screws I would say it shipped no later than c. 1954; a pre New Model of 1953 improved I frame as Alan said. It became the Model 32-1 in 1961 when the I frame was phased out and it began being produced on the J frame. The ammo is still available and many still shoot this cartridge and even load for it as I do. Some carry that gun as their concealed carry gun.
For $200, it's a very good deal w/90% original finish especially if it has original stocks. The serial # will be stamped on the inside of the right stock panel if the stocks are original to the gun.
The cartridge is no slouch, anything but anemic, and not that far behind the 38 Spl. You might be surprised, especially in the 200 gr police loading. The 38/200, as the Brits called it, was their standard military service revolver cartridge during world war II.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 12-31-2012 at 03:16 PM.
|
12-31-2012, 10:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
IMHO, as long as it's a pre-J, with the smaller frame, it makes sense to get it even in the "anemic" 38 S&W chambering specifically because of the smaller size. You have the smallest solid-frame 38 that S&W ever made, so enjoy it. As friend Hondo44 said, "... the cartridge is no slouch..." it was adjudged sufficient for military use by the Brits and others, and just like its more popular (in the US at least) brother the 38 Special, reloading is as easy as falling off a log once you have the right dies and components.
Froggie
|
12-31-2012, 10:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 662
Liked 1,518 Times in 643 Posts
|
|
That sounds like a fair deal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanfl
Thanks for the feedback on the approx. value. The weapon is offered to me at $200.00 and seems like a good purchase to add to my small collection even with the annemic chambering. It's kind of a neat little piece. As ta mie bahd spelin, Ey ges tha yolks un mi. Ey'l yews spel cheker n tha fuetur.
|
|
01-01-2013, 02:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: western Washington
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 1
Liked 763 Times in 454 Posts
|
|
Love themTerriers, esp the half-moon front sight models. Pics please!
|
01-01-2013, 08:19 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 3,413
Liked 4,084 Times in 1,449 Posts
|
|
I agree its anemic unless YOU are the one shot with it. I don't want to get shot with any thing including pellet rifle been there done that no fun at all especially in the family jewels.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|