Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2018, 03:44 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default Target hammer??

Just bought an early K38 Target Masterpiece # K104712. It is the heavy bbl. type and is 100% matching. All numbered parts are correct. According to my S&W book, the target hammer came out in 1952 and this is a 1950-1951 revolver with the target hammer.
Is the revolver too early for a TH? I will letter it later. Thanks, Big Larry

Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 01-04-2018, 04:10 PM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,203
Likes: 34,574
Liked 10,745 Times in 3,661 Posts
Default

SCSW, 4th Ed. page 494 says the .500" target hammer became available in 1949 as an option for K frames. 1950 for N frames. So, yeah, it's possible your gun shipped with one.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-04-2018, 04:10 PM
JSR III's Avatar
JSR III JSR III is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,577
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,925 Times in 3,546 Posts
Default

I would not worry about the dates in the books too much. Often times they are guesstimates based on observed examples. It is also possible that a prior owner decided to upgrade the gun once the TH's came out.

I own a K-22 that came without a TH or TT and a gun buddy of mine and my S&W mentor bought them for me for my birthday and installed them.

Upgrades like this do not have the stigma attached to them like a refinish does or at least they don't IMHO.

Nice looking revolver. Enjoy.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-04-2018, 08:22 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,209
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,514 Times in 8,549 Posts
Default

Are there any stamps on the left grip frame under the stock?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2018, 08:43 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,770
Likes: 2,470
Liked 8,296 Times in 2,908 Posts
Default

Neat K-38
IIRC the proper nomenclature for your version is the S&W "K-38 Heavy Masterpiece".

IMO target hammer can be factory original time wise but only way to know for sure is with a letter.
On a side note you have the period correct style Magnas with "High shoulders" , give them a close look as you are bordering the period between the earlier standard nickel brass medallions and the plastic ones that appear for a very short time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2018, 09:56 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. I just bought this revolver and it is being shipped from Calif. to Utah, so I probably won't get it until Monday. As you can tell by the picture it is a good 98%+. Even the cylinder and bbl. are numbered to the gun besides the high horn magnas.
I also have a 1949 version NIB with the light bbl. It is drippy mint.
In my collection I also have a MIB 38 Combat Masterpiece shipped in 1953 that letters with a target hammer, and walnut target stocks. It goes on to say, the target triggers came out much later. When I have it in hand, I will answer all the questions. Now, all I need is a heavy bbl K22 5 screw. Thanks all. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2018, 10:49 PM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,025
Likes: 910
Liked 9,882 Times in 3,634 Posts
Wink NOW YOU SEE IT---NOW YOU DON'T

No guarantees, but I believe the "Heavy" nomenclature is applicable to the wide rib K-22.

In the beginning (of post-war K frame targets) all three had narrow ribs----and different weights. The lunatic fringe fussed about the different weights. S&W responded with a wide rib K-32 and K-38----which weighed essentially the same as the narrow rib K-22. All is well---but not for long.

Enter once again the lunatic fringe who fussed about the narrow rib K-22. S&W responded with a wide rib (and heavier barrel) K-22, which I believe was referred to as the "Heavy" Masterpiece. Perhaps weary of the lunatic fringe, S&W sold both the narrow rib K-22 and the wide rib K-22 for a spell side by side----leaving the fringe nothing to fuss about----for awhile at least.

The wide rib K-22 outsold the narrow rib K-22 by a wide margin---and S&W dropped the narrow rib K-22 from the line-up-----leaving the three K frame Masterpieces once again with different weights. I reckon the lunatic fringe was tired---or at least didn't fuss much about the "new" weight imbalance----and they all lived happily ever after.

Ralph Tremaine

As an aside, these three K frames which "weighed the same" weighed (essentially) the same------------loaded. As a card carrying member of the lunatic fringe, I have mused about fussing about the mismatched weights once the first round was fired from each. I thought better of it, only for fear of commitment proceedings.

Last edited by rct269; 01-04-2018 at 11:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 01-05-2018, 12:06 AM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,770
Likes: 2,470
Liked 8,296 Times in 2,908 Posts
Default

The new wider rib weight matched K-32 and K-38 versions first appear in the 1950 AMC as the "K-32 & K-38 HEAVY Masterpiece alongside the earlier style 6" narrow rib K-22_K-32_K38 Masterpiece revolvers .

The new wider rib K-32 and K-38 supplemented the older narrow rib versions for a while but the new wide rib K-22 doesnt appear until 1955 and very quickly replaced the older narrow rib version.

On a side note the K-38 and K-22 Combat masterpiece continued with the old style narrow rib tapered barrel until the dash 5 revision.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 01-05-2018, 08:48 AM
JSR III's Avatar
JSR III JSR III is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,577
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,925 Times in 3,546 Posts
Default

You guys know so many unique details that sometimes its scary. I just can't keep track of all of these little changes in my head. If I tried I think that my head would explode. Usually I have to copy and print these posts for future reference.

I can still remember my NJ drivers license number from 1970 but these details just escape my sieve of a brain.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 01-05-2018, 12:21 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

My K38 is due to be shipped today. When I alluded to the target hammer as being from 1952, I was quoting from a factory letter from Mr. Jinks. My letter was for my K-32, shipped 10-1952. He stated in the letter that, that was the 1st year for the target hammer. I don't know why he added that as my K-32 has no options, but it is the heavy type. I re read my S&W book where it states the target hammer came out in 1949, so I am quite sure my new treasure came with one. A letter will confirm or deny this.
In any event, this revolver is close to mint. Now to find a correct box. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-05-2018, 12:58 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,918
Likes: 3,029
Liked 14,268 Times in 5,436 Posts
Default

Ralph, The wider the rib, the heavier the gun. The bigger the bore, the lighter the gun, soooo . . . as stated above, the the K32 and K38 had the wider ribs, while the K22 remained the same.

I have a K38 Heavy Masterpiece, with serial number K107,6XX which shipped in July, 1951 with a target hammer and trigger. I also added a set of Target stocks for the range. The box for the gun has a glued on label, since the company was apparently still using up old boxes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1010008.jpg (92.3 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg P1010004.jpg (103.6 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg P1010006.jpg (133.3 KB, 33 views)
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-05-2018, 01:01 PM
Doc44's Avatar
Doc44 Doc44 is offline
Moderator

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 1,316
Liked 30,345 Times in 4,355 Posts
Default

I checked my All Model Circulars and the earliest date I could find with a reference to a target hammer and target stocks for the Masterpiece line of revolvers is January 1950. An AMC printed in April 1949 has no reference to TH and TS, so I would estimate they first became available sometime in the second half of 1949.

Bill
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 01-07-2018, 01:50 PM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,025
Likes: 910
Liked 9,882 Times in 3,634 Posts
Wink I KNOW!---I KNOW!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
Ralph, The wider the rib, the heavier the gun. The bigger the bore, the lighter the gun, soooo . . . as stated above, the the K32 and K38 had the wider ribs, while the K22 remained the same.

I have a K38 Heavy Masterpiece, with serial number K107,6XX which shipped in July, 1951 with a target hammer and trigger. I also added a set of Target stocks for the range. The box for the gun has a glued on label, since the company was apparently still using up old boxes.
Yeah, I know all that (The wider the rib, the heavier the gun.--etc.)----chapter and verse. I was commenting on the use of the term "Heavy"---in describing a particular "Masterpiece" revolver (22/32/38). I had it in my head the term "Heavy" was used only in conjunction with the wide rib K-22---I still have it in my head.

As it happens, that's the only place I have it. After the fact of running my mouth, I went looking for some backup----didn't find any---neither to confirm nor deny. I suspect the term "Heavy" may have been used in the brochures of the time when both K-22's (narrow and wide rib) were being sold---to differentiate between the two. But that's all I do---suspect, because I didn't find diddly to confirm/deny.

Actually, I did find something to confirm or deny; but it was an illegible photograph---so out of focus as to be worthless---but there it was anyway. It was a picture of the end of a box (gold with blue)----and it said "Heavy Masterpiece". The bad news is I couldn't make out which one (which caliber).
And having now said that, it occurs to me I have several such K frame gold with blue boxes upstairs in my box box------I'll have a look. Maybe----just maybe----------------------

On to perhaps more important matters---it's a pretty good bet the world is not going to end tomorrow.

Ralph Tremaine
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-07-2018, 02:16 PM
Doc44's Avatar
Doc44 Doc44 is offline
Moderator

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 1,316
Liked 30,345 Times in 4,355 Posts
Default

In looking through the invoices for the first half of the 1950s, I find the terms K-38 Masterpiece Heavy Barrel and K-22 Masterpiece (no reference to a heavy barrel).

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-07-2018, 02:50 PM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,025
Likes: 910
Liked 9,882 Times in 3,634 Posts
Default

Perhaps someone in the "paper" crowd has some brochures from the period that will tell us what's what.

Ralph Tremaine
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-07-2018, 03:57 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,770
Likes: 2,470
Liked 8,296 Times in 2,908 Posts
Default

The word "Heavy" was added to identify the weight matched (Wider rib) K-32 and K-38 masterpiece models because they were being marketed alongside the older narrow rib K-32 and K-38 from around 1949-1954.

Since the K-32 and K-38 "Heavy" Masterpiece revolvers were weight matched to the narrow rib K-22 there was no need for a K-22 "Heavy" Masterpiece (yet).

About the same time that the older narrow rib K-32 and K-38 are discontinued (late 54 ish ?) a new version of the K-22 appears (early 1955 ish ?) with the new style square frame shoulders mating to a slightly wider barrel rib that looks like the K-32 Heavy barrel rib (K-38 rib is much wider).

The older narrow rib / notched shoulder frame did continue on the Combat Masterpiece to mate to its 4" narrow rib barrel but guessing perhaps it was easier to just use a wider rib barrel with square shoulders where it meets the barrel rib for the K-22 as well so it matched cosmetically with its larger bore 6" siblings .
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-07-2018, 08:10 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,918
Likes: 3,029
Liked 14,268 Times in 5,436 Posts
Default

I wish I knew what the date for this flyer was, but it does appear to be late 40s during the transition to Heavy K32 and K38 Masterpiece revolvers. Has some interesting information.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Masterpiece Flyer.pdf (836.8 KB, 38 views)
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:03 AM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,025
Likes: 910
Liked 9,882 Times in 3,634 Posts
Default

Well, there we have it-----BOTH the .32 & .38 were referred to as "heavy" at this point in time------and if you wanted a "heavy" .22 you were plumb out of luck----at this point in time. Then along came the "heavy" .22---according to me.

And if you wanted something heavier, you could get an Outdoorsman (.38)-------with a narrow rib---and/or the same only different, a Model 1950 (.45---or .44)----and so it goes.

Ralph Tremaine

I got my "heavy" K-22 shortly after the time of this brochure---first brand new gun (not counting a Christmas present of a Remington single shot .22 rifle when I was 12).

Last edited by rct269; 01-08-2018 at 11:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:25 AM
JSR III's Avatar
JSR III JSR III is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,577
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,925 Times in 3,546 Posts
Default

If you look at the brochure closely, the guns on the left were matched by SIZE with weights differing by 3/4 oz and 2 1/2 ozs.

The guns shown on the right are matched by weight with the K 32 and K38 being increased to 38 1/2 ozs. to match the already heavier K22 of same weight.

There was no need to refer to the K 22 as a HEAVY as it always was a heavier gun. It was only the newly designed K32 and K38 that had to become heavy to match.

It is interesting to me that the smaller caliber gun was heavier to begin with as one would assume that a larger caliber frame and barrel would be made heavier to handle the larger caliber. Obviously, that was not the case.

Apparently, due to complaints outlined above by Ralph, the 32 and 38 were weight increased so that shooting any of these guns would feel the same at least weight wise. Certainly not the same once the trigger was pulled.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:47 AM
Coaltminer Coaltminer is offline
Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: May 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 789
Likes: 9
Liked 478 Times in 233 Posts
Default Target Hammer

Looks like it's probably factory, but I once bought a K22 that someone put in a TH and trigger in, AFU, sent to Smith, they fitted them. I found an M19 at a dealer shop, 2.5" that had TH and TT installed with a yellow front sight. Perfect setup, but I didn't have a need or the cash. Would've loved it. Don't kid yourself, snubs are accurate. I had a 12-2 from OH Corrections, had Pachmyer target Grips on it. I replaced em with original kind. Also, don't know when it occurred, but 12's went to wider frames as other K's, still light Frame. One I had was extremely accurate. K Frame snubs are great. Looking for a reasonably priced 15, 2". Going for big bucks compared to 4"

at
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-08-2018, 12:20 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

It is of no real consequence if it is not original. Standard speed hammers are available to change this one out if not lettered with the target hammer, but I am willing to bet it was shipped with a target hammer. It is amazing though, it still retains it's numbered magnas. In those days, most shooters had the big thumb rest stocks and threw the magnas away. Just like the box. Gone forever. My Dad was a competitive shooter in the early 50's and I can remember those big thumb rest stocks on his K-38. Email shows it is in Cedar and will be delivered today. Now, to find a heavy bbl. 5 screw K22. Has eluded me for years just as the K-38. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-08-2018, 01:11 PM
crsides crsides is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
Default

This Harry Jarvis engraved k38 in same serial number range came with this same style target hammer. They seem to be a little thinner in profile, and extend further back.



Charlie

Last edited by crsides; 05-28-2018 at 11:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 01-08-2018, 01:30 PM
wheelgun610's Avatar
wheelgun610 wheelgun610 is offline
Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Grinder's Switch, TN
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1,440
Liked 1,444 Times in 664 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III View Post
.... It is interesting to me that the smaller caliber gun was heavier to begin with as one would assume that a larger caliber frame and barrel would be made heavier to handle the larger caliber. Obviously, that was not the case.
I think a lot of that had to do with the fact that they could use the same barrel forging, and external machining for all three calibers. The only difference would be in the gun drilling and rifling operations.

I also think that later, when all three calibers used the heavier, non-tapered barrels, that was probably initiated to eliminate a step in milling the contour of the tapered barrel. The tapered barrels required an extra milling operation, whereas the non- tapered barrels could be milled with just one.

Mark
__________________
S&W Forum Member #721
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-08-2018, 07:18 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
Are there any stamps on the left grip frame under the stock?
A very tiny 4. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-08-2018, 07:20 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy View Post
Neat K-38
IIRC the proper nomenclature for your version is the S&W "K-38 Heavy Masterpiece".

IMO target hammer can be factory original time wise but only way to know for sure is with a letter.
On a side note you have the period correct style Magnas with "High shoulders" , give them a close look as you are bordering the period between the earlier standard nickel brass medallions and the plastic ones that appear for a very short time.
Nickel Brass. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-08-2018, 07:22 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crsides View Post
This Harry Jarvis engraved k38 in same serial number range came with this same style target hammer. They seem to be a little thinner in profile, and extend further back.



Charlie
Mine is just like it. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-08-2018, 07:23 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,209
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,514 Times in 8,549 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryofcc View Post
A very tiny 4. Big Larry
OK, that's just a standard inspector stamp. The gun was not returned to S&W for refinish/rework at the factory.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-08-2018, 07:25 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer?? Target hammer??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 5
Liked 2,984 Times in 827 Posts
Default

Revolver here. Understated by seller it is a true 99% revolver with a very think turn line and no wear whatsoever. Not even on the muzzle. Recoil shield shows no hint of it being fired. Now, for that heavy bbl. K-22 5 screw to match. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SPF...WTS: K22 post war 5 screw w target hammer & unrelieved target grips Göring's S&W GUNS - For Sale or Trade 25 09-22-2017 01:36 PM
FOUND-- ANY N Frame target hammer & trigger, N Sq target size/style stocks TheShootist1894 WANTED to Buy 4 06-13-2014 07:04 PM
WTB: Blue K Frame Target Trigger and Target Hammer .500 lonestarmatt WANTED to Buy 1 07-22-2012 06:50 PM
sold:NOS CC .500 target hammer for K-frame rimfire (17/617/18) with .400 target trigg Jeroenw114 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 1 04-14-2012 11:11 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)