Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2013, 06:27 PM
Senor Chisme Senor Chisme is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 156 Times in 34 Posts
Default Disappointed

Just got back from the Ft. Worth gun show with my latest find. It's a sweet little I-frame 3" in .32 Long. I have to assume that that means .32 S&W Long. It has that really neat looking dual diameter ejector rod and all the numbers match (3164XX). The last patent date on the top of the barrel is "Dec 29.14". The finish is not so great but I want it as a shooter. I don't have any safe queens. (That's not exactly true, but that's another story.) It cleaned up well and the action is nice and tight, just a little end shake. The bore has good strong rifling but there are some pits in the barrel. Not really bad and I hope it won't affect the accuracy. Hopefully I will know next week at the range. The only thing that disappointed me was that it didn't have the original grips. I guess I will just have to settle for the ones that came on it. By the way, does anyone know the official designation of this model and approximately when it was produced? Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_2225.jpg (82.7 KB, 326 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2226.jpg (86.4 KB, 291 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2231.jpg (60.7 KB, 245 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2234.jpg (71.3 KB, 258 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 06-08-2013, 06:32 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,046 Times in 9,316 Posts
Default

It's a .32 Regulation Police, and can use .32 S & W or Long. Others have a better track on their SNs, but I think early 1920s sounds about right. Looks like it has lots of "honest wear/character". Enjoy!
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220

Last edited by murphydog; 06-08-2013 at 07:04 PM. Reason: missed photo of stepped backstrap...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-2013, 06:41 PM
05CarbonDRZ 05CarbonDRZ is offline
SWCA Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cottage Grove,WI
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 1,540
Liked 5,518 Times in 1,650 Posts
Default

If those are original stag stocks they can be sold to fund the purchase of period correct stocks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2013, 06:56 PM
Senor Chisme Senor Chisme is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 156 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Actually, the grips are what first attracted my attention to this gun. I looked at it and said "Isn't that cute?" (Really...I actually used the word "cute" to describe a gun. First time ever.) My partner and I finished the rest of the show then came back to the table where I had first seen the gun. I kept hoping that it had been sold. But noooo, there it was, just calling my name and saying "Take me home with you. Take me home with you." It turned out that I knew the guy whose table it was on. He gave me a brother-in-law deal that I just couldn't refuse. And I know the grips are worth about 2/3 of what I paid for gun and grips. I think I really like those grips just fine. By the way, does anyone have an explanation of why there is a step in the back strap? And also when did S&W change the cartridge designation from .32 Long to .32 S&W Long (if ever?) Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-08-2013, 07:01 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
Default I think that's a beaut

... just the way it is now. Honest exterior wear doesn't hurt a gun one bit in my book.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-08-2013, 07:04 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,046 Times in 9,316 Posts
Default

Sorry, sleep-deprived and missed the stepped backstrap - this makes it a .32 Regulation Police, which came with square butt style stocks that fit into the bottom of the step. Don't know why they didn't put "S & W" into the barrel rollmark; maybe it didn't fit on the shortest barrel?
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-08-2013, 07:29 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
Default

By interpolation, the serial number on that gun suggests production and shipment in the course of 1920. The proper stocks would be Regulation Police stocks without medallions, and you should expect that they would have the June 5, 1917 patent date on the bottom surface. These stocks sometimes show up on Ebay or Gunbroker, or perhaps someone here has an extra set they would be willing to let pass along. Any other RP stocks would fit, but if they have dished gold colored medallions they are from the 1917-1919 period, and if they have silver medallions they are from late 1930 to 1940.

If you find silver medallion RP stocks with rounded corners to the checking field, you have postwar stocks.

Fine little shooter. You will find lots of entertainment value at the range with that one.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-08-2013, 07:39 PM
kwalityguy kwalityguy is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
Wink

I thnk u mean you were at the Dallas Gun Show which is running today and tomorrow. Next FW show is June 22-23. Don't want someone to drive over to FW tomorrow by mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-08-2013, 07:54 PM
rsl's Avatar
rsl rsl is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stuart, Florida
Posts: 157
Likes: 1
Liked 71 Times in 30 Posts
Default 32

Love those grips... Makes the little guy stand out....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-08-2013, 08:16 PM
Senor Chisme Senor Chisme is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 156 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Sorry, Kwality guy. You are right. It was the Dallas show. Since I didn't drive, and slept on the way there and back, I guess I wasn't paying attention to where I was.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-08-2013, 09:43 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 383
Liked 988 Times in 535 Posts
Default

That's a beautiful old gun with a ton of character.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2013, 10:37 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,636
Likes: 242
Liked 29,149 Times in 14,094 Posts
Default

I wonder why I NEVER see a RP? I'd really like to have one in .38 S&W, just because I like anything in .38 S&W.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-08-2013, 10:44 PM
S&WIowegan S&WIowegan is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,763 Times in 1,784 Posts
Smile

Pitted barrels aren't a problem with jacketed ammo which I don't think exists in .32 Long. You might experience a bit of leading with standard lead ammo. No big deal probably.
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2013, 10:45 PM
22hipower 22hipower is online now
SWCA Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 8,093
Liked 12,203 Times in 2,777 Posts
Default

DWalt, you could have seen some RPs at the Dallas show today. One guy had six or seven of them, all nice, on his table.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-08-2013, 10:58 PM
TACC1 TACC1 is offline
US Veteran
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wautoma, WI 54982
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 6,564
Liked 799 Times in 499 Posts
Default

That's a good looking RP, and the stocks really set it off.

Dwalt, here's a 38RP, but it is cut down and refinished.
(Not sure how that pic of the .32 Lemon-Squeezer got in there!)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg a 38RP.jpg (108.3 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpg O 001.jpg (145.1 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg guns 002.jpg (196.1 KB, 62 views)

Last edited by TACC1; 06-11-2013 at 02:09 AM. Reason: Explaining away a mistake
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 06-09-2013, 08:17 AM
Retired W4's Avatar
Retired W4 Retired W4 is online now
US Veteran
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,000
Likes: 16,250
Liked 19,865 Times in 4,488 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S&WIowegan View Post
Pitted barrels aren't a problem with jacketed ammo which I don't think exists in .32 Long. You might experience a bit of leading with standard lead ammo. No big deal probably.
Magtech makes a SJHP in 32 S&W Long.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-09-2013, 09:29 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is online now
US Veteran
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,808
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,431 Times in 8,279 Posts
Default

The step in the back strap is for the fit of the correct grips, that make the Rd butt into a Sq butt. Here's a picture, this is a .38 S&W, the the grips are the same. This is vintage 1925.

__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 06-09-2013, 12:00 PM
ImprovedModel56Fan ImprovedModel56Fan is online now
US Veteran
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 7,540
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
Default

Beautiful grips! You will probably still appreciate a grip adapter.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-10-2013, 07:31 AM
992B 992B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 1,383
Liked 133 Times in 55 Posts
Default

I have a 6" RP and they are fun shooters! A friend has some nice RP grips he wants to sell, but I don't know what vintage they are. Shoot it and enjoy it. Gary
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-10-2013, 02:22 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,023
Likes: 8,998
Liked 48,770 Times in 9,262 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senor Chisme View Post
By the way, does anyone have an explanation of why there is a step in the back strap? And also when did S&W change the cartridge designation from .32 Long to .32 S&W Long (if ever?) Thanks again.
Look here to understand the step- Early 38 Regulation Police

The cartridge designation is merely a difference in markings. The cartridge was always the "32 S&W Long".
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-10-2013, 03:50 PM
Senor Chisme Senor Chisme is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 156 Times in 34 Posts
Default

I knew that about the actual cartridge name, I was just curious about the caliber designation stamped on the barrel of the various Smiths down through the years.
Thank you everyone for your most enlightening information. That's what I really like about this forum. All the collective knowledge that is so freely shared.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:43 PM
kframeman kframeman is offline
Member
Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: western oregon
Posts: 66
Likes: 4,241
Liked 90 Times in 24 Posts
Default

I love the grips, kinda gives the package a bit of class. agj
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:54 PM
jinx's Avatar
jinx jinx is offline
US Veteran
Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed Disappointed  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 1,259
Liked 995 Times in 456 Posts
Default

The stags make it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A little disappointed.... rwsmith The Lounge 2 12-22-2016 11:48 PM
Disappointed with S&W steve462x0 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 68 05-09-2014 09:23 PM
A tad bit disappointed...... Larry Walls Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 22 08-31-2011 08:45 PM
A LITTLE DISAPPOINTED TAXMAN6 Reloading 5 08-26-2011 12:34 AM
I was really disappointed.......... moosedog The Lounge 29 05-21-2011 09:28 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)