|
|
03-06-2014, 08:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 4,048
Liked 2,541 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
Post war, long action, snubby, numbers?
Anyone know the numbers? total post war long action k frames, and further, snubbies in this category?
I seemed to recall there was someone on this forum who focused on this category. I find it interesting too. Your help is appreciated.
The one I'm looking at is local and priced to sell, square butt, mechanically excellent, worn with no pitting or signs of abuse (80% finish), sharp shoulder magnas. The price is good, but I would like to have some perspective on numbers on this type.
|
03-06-2014, 09:18 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
I know for a fact there is at least one.
Charlie
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-06-2014, 09:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 4,048
Liked 2,541 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
That's a beauty, a little cleaner than the one in question, but very similar.
|
03-06-2014, 10:48 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 993
Liked 19,048 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
The SCSW notes a minimum of about 180,000 post war long action .38 M & Ps, S 811,000 to 990,000 (roughly). If someone here has an educated guess as to the percentage of those that were 2", there is your answer. An uneducated guess on my part would be 15-20% by observation, but the real experts may know for certain.
Edit for bad math!
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Last edited by murphydog; 03-06-2014 at 11:14 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-06-2014, 11:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 4,048
Liked 2,541 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
Wow, that's a lot.
|
03-07-2014, 06:55 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,283 Times in 910 Posts
|
|
I can vouch for another one. Mine is S936150 and looks like it just came from the factory.
Curl
Last edited by CptCurl; 03-07-2014 at 07:03 AM.
Reason: Added obligatory photo. Not my photo, but from seller when I bought this nice piece.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-07-2014, 08:09 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St Augustine
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 2,314
Liked 5,696 Times in 848 Posts
|
|
__________________
Rick
SWCA #2727 , SWHF #435
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-07-2014, 09:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,822
Likes: 58,073
Liked 53,110 Times in 16,567 Posts
|
|
1946
__________________
Sure you did
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Some of the postwar long-action S-prefix K-frames were not standard .38 Special M&Ps, though most were. There are the 2000-3000 Model of 1946 Target revolvers (the Mexican model); some .32 Long M&P revolvers in various barrel lengths (number unknown, but perhaps several hundred to 2000); and I think some postwar Commonwealth guns in .38 S&W (a South African order for about 5000 revolvers comes to mind, but I may be remembering a contract for short-action revolvers after 1948). At any rate, I think the total postwar commercial (and new non-wartime military) .38 Special production would have come to no more than about 170,000- 175,000 units. Most of these would have been for uniformed law enforcement officers or security guards, and those would typically have had four, five or six-inch barrels. My own guess is that two-inch M&P production before the short action was introduced would have been no more than about five percent of the total -- maybe 8500 units, give or take a few. Even that may be an exaggeration. In a world in which patrol officers and uniformed guards greatly outnumbered detectives, other plainclothes officers and security section administrators, how many compact .38s would you have to produce before the market was saturated?
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 04-21-2014 at 10:30 AM.
Reason: Typos, clarity.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-18-2014, 06:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 4,048
Liked 2,541 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
I just cycled back to this post, thanks for all the good info.
|
04-18-2014, 08:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crsides
I know for a fact there is at least one.
|
Charlie
Have you reported that one to me? I have one 2" in the database that belongs to you with serial number S960xxx. I assume this is it.
CptCurl - I know I don't have yours recorded. A PM will be on its way to you.
Thanks.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
04-18-2014, 09:24 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beagleye
I seemed to recall there was someone on this forum who focused on this category.
|
I suspect you were remembering my project.
Nearly 20% of the S prefix guns reported to me so far have the 2" barrel. However, there are two reasons that no conclusion should be extrapolated from that fact.
1. The overall sample size is still too small to reach even tentative conclusions.
2. The majority of my data (perhaps 80%) have been gathered from people who participate in this Forum. The people with snubbies tend to like to share about them, etc. So, since self reporting has driven the data collection so far, it may be skewed.
That said, I suspect David's estimate is not far off. The actual number might be a little bit higher, and the database at this point would seem to indicate that 2" guns became more common the farther you get away from the war years. Roy has confirmed that the earliest production went heavily to LEO agencies. Much of that production is not yet accounted for in my records, but there is a disproportionate number from the early serials that did ship to agencies. A large segment of the very early shipments went to the NYPD. These LEO pieces were all 4" and 5" guns, according to the information collected so far.
The gun in Ladder13's photo is the earliest 2" gun so far recorded in my database. It shipped in April, 1946.
Here's a photo of one in my collection. It shipped in September, 1947. Its serial number is very close to the one shown by CptCurl, above.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: WI, The Badger State
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 4,517
Liked 7,724 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blindref
|
Rick
I have S970479. VERY close to yours. Identical Configuration
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2014, 10:29 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
Charlie
Have you reported that one to me? I have one 2" in the database that belongs to you with serial number S960xxx. I assume this is it.
CptCurl - I know I don't have yours recorded. A PM will be on its way to you.
Thanks.
|
Yep, that's the one pictured above.
Charlie
|
04-19-2014, 10:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Low Desert of CA
Posts: 511
Likes: 419
Liked 421 Times in 134 Posts
|
|
|
04-20-2014, 11:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 25
Likes: 5
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Post war numbers
I traded for a 2" snubby # S9623XX and a 4" # S9474XX at the start of the year.
|
04-20-2014, 12:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,326 Times in 2,922 Posts
|
|
In the last 5 years I have only seen 3 for sale at gunstores pawnshops and shows but have seen maybe 50 of same era with 4" and 5" barrels.
last one was 3 years back but dont recall its serial,
The ask was $450 and I almost bought it but for some light pitting passed...still regret that.
One thing I have always found interesting is even in the pre war snub M&P's they never used the barrel end ejector rod tip so in a way these snubs are the forerunners to the modern ejector rod style.
|
04-20-2014, 01:25 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
One thing I have always found interesting is even in the pre war snub M&P's they never used the barrel end ejector rod tip so in a way these snubs are the forerunners to the modern ejector rod style.
|
This was purely practical. With the 2" barrel you barely have enough throw to get full extraction. Of necessity, the full length of the rod must slide into the tunnel in the yoke or ejection would be incomplete. This was not an issue on the longer barrel guns.
But the original MERK required a two step machining process for the bottom surface of the barrel. In 1927, this was simplified by the introduction of the LERK, which only required a simple cut in the barrel's underside.
Finally, someone realized a large efficiency could be achieved by making all the rod ends uniform, thus eliminating any necessary machining on the barrels and simplifying inventory. That led to the change order of October 4, 1946, directing a change to the extractor rod knob on all M&P revolvers, regardless of barrel length.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
04-20-2014, 02:40 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,108 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
This is one of first 100 2 inch M&P shipped after WW 2 shipped 08/22/1946 Serial 833889 small s after number.
Last edited by Toyman; 04-20-2014 at 02:47 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-20-2014, 03:14 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
|
|
Toyman
Thanks for the post. I show that gun in my database to be the third earliest 2" yet reported. The earliest one I've located was shipped in April, 1946 and carries serial number S816xxx.
I have a few questions for you, but one is whether those stocks came on the gun. I tend to think not, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
04-20-2014, 03:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,108 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
No serial numbers on inside of plastic grips either did not stick or were never there. These guns were most likely made up from left over pre war parts and I believe the plastic grips are correct to the gun.
|
04-21-2014, 07:28 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW Ga.
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 2,250
Liked 680 Times in 220 Posts
|
|
I have sn,S843454. It's a square butt.
|
04-21-2014, 09:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Maine
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 47
Liked 621 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
I don't know if you are also keeping track of the later fishhook style but I've got a Detroit gun serial number C43659. I posted it in a thread a few years ago:
Smith and Wesson M&P Detroit PD gun from 1948
|
04-21-2014, 10:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 353
Likes: 286
Liked 168 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Jack, I have S 968903, 2", long action, sq. butt, one line address, the blue gun on the left, the nickle one is a C series.
Last edited by johnny3; 04-21-2014 at 11:00 AM.
|
04-21-2014, 02:41 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twaits
|
Just read through that older post. Very nice DPD snubby you picked up there. Congrats!
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|