Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2014, 06:53 PM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
STCM(SW) STCM(SW) is offline
US Veteran
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,494
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,597 Times in 3,228 Posts
Default Internal hammer block safety

Just read the thread here on S&W production during WW II.
I find it intresting that S&W made the same revolver from 1896 till 1943 with out this safety.
It also seems that S&W had CQ problems with what they delivered to the U. S. Navy.

That being said, Master pistol smith, Austin Behlert removed this safety on every S&W revolver he worked on saying it was not necessary and was in the way of his action work.

Who was right?
Austin or S&W?

BTW, I remove then on any S&W revolvers I have......
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2014, 07:05 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,012
Likes: 8,991
Liked 48,761 Times in 9,259 Posts
Default

S&W first used hammer blocks in the K frame in 1915. The return of the block to the blocking position was passive- it relied on spring pressure. The one that killed a sailor was heavily greased in the cold north Atlantic, and it stuck in the unblocked position.

The block appears in N frames in the early or mid 20s.


IT was common practice to remove hammer blocks in the 70s. I don't think it was a wise practice. I leave them in.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 05-12-2014, 07:18 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
Default

The pre-1945 hammer block safety is very effective, but evidently not 100% safe in certain extreme cases. Otherwise, it could not have survived for 30 years. The 1945 change just made it incrementally safer than it was.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2014, 07:20 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
IT was common practice to remove hammer blocks in the 70s. I don't think it was a wise practice. I leave them in.
The gorilla speaks. The wise take heed!
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2014, 07:22 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
Default

And some people still don't fasten their seat belts either.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2014, 07:49 PM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
STCM(SW) STCM(SW) is offline
US Veteran
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,494
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,597 Times in 3,228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt View Post
And some people still don't fasten their seat belts either.
If you think that's the same as removing that hammer block, well, better left un-said.........

Last time I was in the North Alantic on a DD in the winter was well over 20 years ago......
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2014, 11:18 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety Internal hammer block safety  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
Default

"If you think that's the same as removing that hammer block, well, better left un-said......"

Come on - I'd like really to hear what you think is better left unsaid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on the old hammer block safety tipoc S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 12-27-2018 03:07 PM
637-2 Hammer Block Safety - quick question Wishoot S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 9 06-18-2015 02:28 PM
When did S&W start installing hammer block safety? bbqbob51 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 8 01-21-2014 01:31 PM
Question on Hammer Block Safety.. digi-shots S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 12-11-2009 01:39 AM
Hammer block safety on a K22 Fast Moving Slug S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 03-13-2009 07:15 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)