|
|
11-10-2014, 06:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 36
Likes: 8
Liked 31 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Price check on a pre model 10
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-10-2014, 08:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 25,678
Liked 15,934 Times in 2,182 Posts
|
|
i'll go out on a limb and say 1948 as they started the C series in march of 48. nice gun. lee
|
11-10-2014, 09:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 1,594
Liked 1,977 Times in 732 Posts
|
|
Nice snub! You can help the appearance of your nickel with a good polish such as Flitz. Use a light touch and go slow. Don't use a dremel! After the polish use a good wax such as Renaissance wax. You can use the wax on the grips too.
__________________
Tom
NRA Pistol Inst
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2014, 10:14 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,901
Likes: 989
Liked 19,023 Times in 9,307 Posts
|
|
I would guess a little later than Lee on the year, 1949 or '50.
Yours is a nice example, and I would guess it to be a $500-600 gun. It was one of the less common barrel lengths made at the time and nickel ones are less commonly seen than blue. Enjoy!
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
11-10-2014, 11:37 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 8,076
Liked 12,164 Times in 2,774 Posts
|
|
For whatever its worth, I recently bought this blue one (sn range C165000) which I think is likely 1951 or late 1950 for $432 OTD. I think you'll need the letter if you want to nail the date closer than "1950ish." Nice gun and I agree with murphydog that value is around $500 or maybe a bit more. Enjoy.
Jeff
SWCA #1457
|
11-11-2014, 05:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,630
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
Your snubby (C90558) shipped, likely, in late 1949, November or December. I have several on my list having very nearby SNs which did. Everything on yours seems correct. Without original box, I'd say that in most parts of the country it would bring in the neighborhood of $500 in a private transaction. Keep it waxed. Any wax will work. I use Johnson's paste wax on mine. Some use auto paint wax (Turtle wax, Simoniz, etc.). It doesn't seem to need polishing, but Flitz metal polish works well. There is lots of erroneous information around that you should never let Hoppe's #9 bore cleaner near your nickel finish. Totally false - Hoppe's won't hurt it.
"I recently bought this blue one (sn range C165000) which I think is likely 1951..."
Probable shipment in April 1951, from others on my list.
Last edited by DWalt; 11-11-2014 at 05:43 AM.
|
11-11-2014, 06:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 36
Likes: 8
Liked 31 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the information, gonna try some of that Flitz too.
|
11-11-2014, 06:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Hoppe's will hurt the nickel if left soaking in it. Been there LOL ruined a 27
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-11-2014, 09:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 36
Likes: 8
Liked 31 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
I had a Colt Trooper in nickle that became cloudy after just a normal cleaning using Hoppes #9. I pushed a soaked patch thru each chamber and just let it run down over the cylinder as I had normally done when cleaning my blued or stainless guns. That cloudiness never did come out, I could make it look better with wax but it would always come back. Now, with nickel, I am extremely careful when cleaning. I typically stay away from nickel because of that, but this gun was definitely calling my name.
|
11-11-2014, 11:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,630
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
There is absolutely nothing in Hoppe's bore cleaners which is reactive with nickel. The original Hoppe's #9 contains a very low percentage of ammonium hydroxide, but ammonium hydroxide does not affect nickel. The argument that Hoppe's attacks the copper underplating is absolutely incorrect, as there is no copper underplating under the nickel. S&W has never used a copper underplating - nickel is deposited directly on steel.
As I earlier stated, the stories about Hoppe's attacking nickel is pure unsubstantiated myth.
|
11-12-2014, 01:47 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 5
Liked 3,014 Times in 839 Posts
|
|
I have # C169886 6-1952. It is blue and near 98% and I gave $375 for it. You are correct as to the accuracy. I loaded mine with Hornaday HV ammo and at 15 yards will shoot the 10 ring all day. Sometimes I use it as a concealed carry when not carrying my Sig P220. Nice gun. Big Larry
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|