Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2014, 04:56 AM
Redcoat3340's Avatar
Redcoat3340 Redcoat3340 is offline
Member
Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 618
Liked 1,721 Times in 630 Posts
Default Old guns/Modern Ammo

I've tried to follow some of the threads about what can be safely shot out of old Smith .32 and .38 top breaks., but I'm still not sure I know. I'd like to own some of the early Smiths, but I want to shoot them as well. (not going to shoot 1,000 rounds, but I'd like to take them to the range on occasion.)

So I'm wondering if someone can educate me in as simple terms as possible:

Which older Smiths can safely handle modern, commercial .38 special or .32 S&W Longs? (I just picked up a 30-1 so I'll be buying the longs and I've got a few .38's.)

I'll be reloading both calibers in Jan next year, so perhaps someone might guide me in terms of safe homebrews for these great old guns.

This board has been great for me. I've got a dozen Smiths now and if it weren't for the folks here I'd probably be shooting a Glock.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2014, 07:22 AM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,539
Likes: 89,848
Liked 24,923 Times in 8,532 Posts
Default

Most any S&W hand ejector, in good condition, will handle modern standard ammo. By this, I mean the 158 grain lead round nose round. I would probably use the 148 grain full wadcutter in the Model of 1899 revolvers, just because they are over 100 years old and only lock at the rear.

The same for the .32 Long revolvers. All of the hand ejectors should be safe, if in good condition to begin with.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 12-16-2014, 07:25 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is online now
Member
Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,820
Likes: 7,852
Liked 25,737 Times in 8,695 Posts
Default

I do not know exactly how old you are talking about. I have old guns from 1913 on up and I've shot them regularly for years now with NO ill affects.

For the .38 Special Smiths I use a hand load of 3.2 grains of Titegroup under a 158 hard cast RNL bullet - (very mild load).
If you don't reload and standard velocity 158 grain Lead Remington, Winchester or Federal or better yet a 148 grain HBWC (very mild) should work. For the Colt Autos I use Standard Factory .32 and .380 and .25 acp standard Ball (FMJ) ammo (don't reload those calibers).

I would NOT shoot any +P, high velocity or fancy defense rounds through these guns and I would make sure that the guns you are shooting are designed for smokeless powder (NOT iron guns). I'd also go over the gun thoroughly and make sure they are in good repair.

I LOVE old guns and have NO "Safe Queens". If I own it - it gets shot! Just do it wisely.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2014, 08:41 AM
CO_Kid CO_Kid is offline
Member
Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 768
Likes: 872
Liked 681 Times in 282 Posts
Default

My 50 year old Model 10 will shoot +P. I hardly shoot any of it though, just a few rounds of my carry ammo to make sure it functions. Everything else is standard 158 LRN.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2014, 08:48 AM
dangt dangt is offline
Member
Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 130
Likes: 6
Liked 55 Times in 28 Posts
Default

But the top breaks you mention in your original post will not chamber 32 Long nor 38 Special so it is not a matter of whether or not they are safe as long as you were referring to Smith & Wesson top breaks, not some other make.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2014, 09:59 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

Top breaks are discussed in the Antique section. You might get more info over there. Personally I shoot them with modern ammo in the correct cartridge sizes; 32 (not long) and 38 S&W (not special). My 32 was made in 1939 so it has a heat treated cyl. The .38 is older but mechanically sound. I don't shoot either much at all though.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2014, 10:08 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,629
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
Default

The typical smaller US top break revolvers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries from all makers will be found chambered in .38 S&W and .32 S&W, not .38 S&W Special and .32 S&W Long (or their Colt cartridge equivalents). But even they are safe to shoot with standard factory smokeless powder ammunition loadings in those calibers. Factory smokeless powder loadings for these revolvers were offered as early as 1896. While the .38 S&W Special cartridge was originally intended to use black powder, it was almost immediately offered in a smokeless powder loading.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2014, 10:28 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo Old guns/Modern Ammo  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,972
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,362 Times in 5,475 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
. . . My 32 was made in 1939 so it has a heat treated cyl . . .
Jim - I have read this for every S&W sold after the teens, but wonder if the factory actually heat treated all these antique era revolver cylinders? Also, some of these old calibers could have had all parts laying around for later date assembly that were made much earlier?

I have never been concerned about shooting reduced load smokeless in any of my revolvers, but it would seem that many of these late pocket revolvers that became very slow seller in the 1920s and later could well have been put together from parts made in the 1910s or before??

For the OP, I have been loading Trail Boss in all my revolvers below 40 caliber for a long time now fand it works great for my target shooting. You can fill the case to the bottom of the seated bullet, but do not compress, and never worry about over-pressuring or double charging. Clean burning powder that is almost foolproof and the older I get the less I remember.

Use the charts for Trail Boss and start at the low end, but I find that a full charge never yields anything above 750 fps in 32 S&W, 32 Long, 38 S&W, and 38 Special.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modern Classics or Grail Guns? Izzydog S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 39 09-08-2017 08:16 PM
M39 reliability with modern ammo Sam Casey Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 2 02-19-2013 10:56 PM
modern .38sw ammo used in antique guns? perun S&W Antiques 12 06-06-2012 09:58 PM
Modern ammo in old .455 Webleys? therevjay Reloading 5 07-18-2009 08:21 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)