|
|
08-13-2015, 11:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
U.S. Property Surplus Revolver ID
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-13-2015, 11:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
One detail question for clarification since the photo is a bit out of focus: Is the serial number on the butt defaced on the gun, or did you manipulate the picture? If it's on the gun, that's a problem.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-14-2015, 12:14 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
[Original erroneous comments deleted based on subsequent posts.]
I now understand the serial number is C268xxx. I have seen a reference to a 38 M&P with the US Property marking and nearby serial number. It was shipped in late 1953.
The stocks may be original to that gun. If you take them off , you should see a stamped number on the right panel that matches the serial number, but without the "C."
And welcome to the forum. I should have said that first.
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 08-14-2015 at 07:54 AM.
Reason: Rewrite post based entirely based on serial number clarification.
|
08-14-2015, 01:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Bankruptadino, So Cal
Posts: 115
Likes: 50
Liked 61 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
Looks like the photo has been purposely manipulated, the rest of the serial number is actually a photo overlay of the grip/frame area in the same photo.
|
08-14-2015, 04:11 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,044 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
Welcome also! This appears to be a military contract postwar .38 Military & Police. There are nearby serial numbered revolvers documented to have shipped to the USMC, but a factory letter would be the only way to verify this. As you noted, the stocks are later replacements. It was called a "Victory Officer's Model" in at least one official publication (see reference in post 1 of this search):
http://smith-wessonforum.com/searchr...7s+model&sa=Go
And here is the link to ordering a letter; expect a 4-6 month delay.
Firearm History Request - Smith & Wesson
Other military collector types should be along shortly to comment. Hope this is helpful.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
08-14-2015, 07:10 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
Well, I can see a partial view of the serial number on the underside flat of the barrel. So if the OP will post that number, that ought to go a long way in answering his questions. Shouldn't be any big secret about the number on a gun that old.
Last edited by Watchdog; 08-14-2015 at 07:13 AM.
|
08-14-2015, 07:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
One detail question for clarification since the photo is a bit out of focus: Is the serial number on the butt defaced on the gun, or did you manipulate the picture? If it's on the gun, that's a problem.
|
The SN has been modifed in the photos. It's in perfect shape on the firearm.
|
08-14-2015, 07:49 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
U.S. Property Surplus Revolver ID
Quote:
Originally Posted by WATCHDOG
Well, I can see a partial view of the serial number on the underside flat of the barrel. So if the OP will post that number, that ought to go a long way in answering his questions. Shouldn't be any big secret about the number on a gun that old.
|
Sure... the SN is 268596.
Last edited by ramblin84; 08-14-2015 at 08:00 AM.
|
08-14-2015, 08:03 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Regarding the original grips, if someone could share a photo & description of what they likely were, that would be appreciated.
|
08-14-2015, 08:03 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
Welcome also! This appears to be a military contract postwar .38 Military & Police. There are nearby serial numbered revolvers documented to have shipped to the USMC, but a factory letter would be the only way to verify this. As you noted, the stocks are later replacements. It was called a "Victory Officer's Model" in at least one official publication (see reference in post 1 of this search):
http://smith-wessonforum.com/searchr...7s+model&sa=Go
And here is the link to ordering a letter; expect a 4-6 month delay.
Firearm History Request - Smith & Wesson
Other military collector types should be along shortly to comment. Hope this is helpful.
|
Many thanks!
|
08-14-2015, 09:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3,512
Liked 1,578 Times in 912 Posts
|
|
All I know is I'd shoot the piss out of it and enjoy it.
__________________
What would Jim Cirillo do?
|
08-14-2015, 09:10 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,044 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblin84
Regarding the original grips, if someone could share a photo & description of what they likely were, that would be appreciated.
|
If you click on the search result link and look at the first post, the similar revolver to yours pictured there has the correct stocks - they look very similar to the ones on it now, but has an uncheckered diamond around the stock screw and flat bottoms.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
08-14-2015, 09:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
One question I forgot to pose: is this revolver OK to shoot +P or should i stick with standard loads only?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-14-2015, 10:36 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblin84
One question I forgot to pose: is this revolver OK to shoot +P or should i stick with standard loads only?
|
Yes, +P loads would be perfectly fine to shoot, but as I always point out when this question is asked about older guns, unless there is a compelling need, I wouldn't.
|
08-14-2015, 10:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Good advice, thx.
|
08-14-2015, 11:12 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 1,007
Liked 4,522 Times in 1,242 Posts
|
|
Neat gun. Shipped in 1953/4 to the USMC, either Camp Lejeune or Barstow, CA. You'll have to get a letter to know specifics. Thanks for posting.
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-14-2015, 12:54 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
I wonder who back then saw a necessity to put the quotation marks around the "U.S. Property".
Leads me to believe that in the 1950s quotations marks were not yet commonly used to express doubt about the authenticity or appropriateness of a term (as in: She had a "headache" ).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-14-2015, 01:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 1,007
Liked 4,522 Times in 1,242 Posts
|
|
The M1917s were the same way. I think someone read the PO, saw the quotation marks and took it literally.
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-14-2015, 02:12 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
That's a neat old gun. Wouldn't mind having it, especially if it was shown to have shipped to Camp Lejeune.
|
08-14-2015, 02:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
The question I'm considering, is it worth $50 and waiting 5 months to find out from S&W? It looks like earlier posts verify that it was shipped to the Corps which confirms my initial info.
|
08-14-2015, 03:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,636
Likes: 242
Liked 29,148 Times in 14,094 Posts
|
|
It might be worthwhile if you are considering selling it in the future, just as proof it was a USMC gun. Otherwise, you already know as much about it (or more) than what you will find out from the letter.
|
08-14-2015, 03:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Thanks again for all of the helpful info. I'm a member of other firearm forums and my experience with this, my first S&W thread, has been very positive.
|
08-16-2015, 11:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: metro Phoenix
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 16,419
Liked 3,964 Times in 1,605 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblin84
Sure... the SN is 268596.
|
Hey Ramblin, the C is part of the serial number.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-17-2015, 12:11 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 3,522
Liked 6,744 Times in 2,626 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblin84
Sure... the SN is 268596.
|
Actually, the serial number is C268596. The "C" is part of the serial number.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-17-2015, 12:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Thanks, several pointed this out. Learning is a good thing.
|
08-17-2015, 12:46 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,044 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
Personally I would get the letter, it will be a confirmation of the gun's history and due to this will increase its value much more than $50. I have lettered much less than 10% of my accumulation but to me this one qualifies.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Last edited by murphydog; 08-17-2015 at 12:47 PM.
|
08-17-2015, 04:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 79
Likes: 70
Liked 84 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
Personally I would get the letter, it will be a confirmation of the gun's history and due to this will increase its value much more than $50. I have lettered much less than 10% of my accumulation but to me this one qualifies.
|
Thanks Alan. I've been leaning in that direction.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|