Is there a definitive answer regarding which of these two models shoots cast bullets better than the other. I know a few guys that claim to be S&W folks and both of them have told me that the 1950 was designed to shoot hardball, while the 1955 was designed more as a target pistol allowing the usage of lead cast bullets. I do understand that the sickness that follows may lead me to have to own both models in order to determine for myself which I prefer. I would however appreciate some input from those far more knowledgible than myself.

As far as I know the ONLY difference between the two was the heavier barrel of the 1955 Model. I know of no difference in rifling, or the chambers, or any other item that could affect accuracy.

__________________
No life story has happy end.

The determining factor in weather a gun groups well with lead bullets is the throat sizes of the cylinder. If you want to be sure of how well a revolver will perform with lead you want to have a few appropriate plug gauges in your pocket when shopping for a new shooter. If you do a search on this forum you'll find lots of info. John Taffin also wrote an excellent article on this subject a few years back. A Google search will provide you with the article.

It will probably take more than a "few" plug gauges to check the throats. I have 4 S&W revolvers in .45 ACP, plus a couple of extra cylinders. I have checked all the cylinder throats, and they range from 0.452" to 0.460". The .452 is the diameter of the throats in a M25-2 that I purchased new in 1979, and the .460 throats are in a spare cylinder fitted by the factory in 1977 chambered for .45 Colt. A 1917 issue gun, a 1917 commercial and a 1950 Target all have throats that are .455-.456", as does a new unfired .45 ACP cylinder. I would expect all of them to shoot jacketed bullets well, and with .454-455" diameter bullets they should do well with lead bullets with the possible exception of the cylinder with .460" throats. I haven't shot that one yet, so will have to see about it.

__________________
Tom
1560

I own both and have shot only ball ammo through them. Both are very accurate but the weight difference is significant. To me the balance of the 1950 is much better because of the lighter barrel, but I shoot the 1955 (pre-25) better because the heavier barrel has less recoil and muzzle flip. They are great revolvers and among my favorites. You will want them both, plus a 1917. Good luck with your self-restraint!

I have both, and I can shoot my '55 better. I think the heavier bbl. is easier for me to hold more steady.

"It will probably take more than a "few" plug gauges to check the throats."

Naaa, just takes me one... A Hornady XTP (.452). Just stick it in my pocket when I go to gun shows, comes in handy for a quick chamber throat check. If it goes in easily, I keep moving along. If it is sticky or doesn't go, that warrants a more thorough inspection.

Thanks guys, I'm a late bloomer when it comes to 45acp revolvers. Started the infection with a very nicely refinished Brazilian model 1917, its an early issue and amazes me with its accuracy. This has sent me on my next quest of finding a nice model of 1950 or 1955 with adjustable sights and other advancements in design. I understand the 25-2 has been a good performer for many people, there is just something about the older models I find more attractive.