|
|
09-13-2015, 10:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 2,473
Liked 5,898 Times in 1,224 Posts
|
|
What is the first digit of this serial number?
Are my eyes fooling me? Is it a 5 or a 6?
Just bought this. It'll be here in a few days. Maybe someone here has a screen with better pcture quality than mine.
Thanks!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-13-2015, 10:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 15,134
Likes: 91,857
Liked 26,392 Times in 8,412 Posts
|
|
I think it's a 6
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-13-2015, 11:10 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Well, to my 60 year old eyes...looking at a photograph...on a computer monitor...using a magnifying glass...it looks like a 6.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-13-2015, 11:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 2,473
Liked 5,898 Times in 1,224 Posts
|
|
Thanks gentlemen!
I was going through roughly the same ocular gymnastics and thought it is probably maybe could be a "6" also. I could just be patient & wait until the gun actually gets here. But, where's the fun in that??
Last edited by policerevolvercollector; 09-13-2015 at 11:27 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-14-2015, 12:01 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,701 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
Note that the large knob cutout is a single depth cut, so the gun was manufactured after 1927. The serial number 518824 would have been manufactured about 1925, and the barrel would have had a dual-depth cut for the larger mushroom-shaped ejector knob. The first digit is necessarily a 6.
__________________
David Wilson
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-14-2015, 12:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 2,473
Liked 5,898 Times in 1,224 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCWilson
Note that the large knob cutout is a single depth cut, so the gun was manufactured after 1927. The serial number 518824 would have been manufactured about 1925, and the barrel would have had a dual-depth cut for the larger mushroom-shaped ejector knob. The first digit is necessarily a 6.
|
Thank you sir!
|
09-14-2015, 12:10 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 161
Likes: 373
Liked 64 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
Read the serial number off of the cylinder, provided it was not replaced. Larry
|
09-14-2015, 02:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
|
|
I'd say 618824. That would put likely shipment between 1929-31, possibly a little later. The closest on my SN list is 6141xx which shipped in 10/1930.
|
09-14-2015, 04:47 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,692
Likes: 472
Liked 5,742 Times in 3,209 Posts
|
|
Try a toothbrush with a little solvent to clear grime and oil. Worked before and cant hurt. Of course when you take possession. A pic of entire gun might help clarify.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
09-14-2015, 05:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 443
Likes: 104
Liked 514 Times in 178 Posts
|
|
I believe it's a 6.
__________________
2B1ASK1
|
09-14-2015, 06:46 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,249
Likes: 11,917
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
To me it's clearly a 6 also, especially on the barrel. The upper left corner of a 5 is a very sharp corner.
When you get it you can confirm the other four locations match our assessment. Always use optical magnification including a flashlight when looking at or for serial numbers to observe the information accurately.
Especially in these locations:
Yoke - on rear face visible thru a chamber with a flashlight
Extractor star - backside
Cylinder - rear face
Right stock - back side
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-14-2015, 06:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 3,710
Liked 8,949 Times in 3,556 Posts
|
|
I vote 6.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
09-29-2015, 01:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 4,304
Liked 3,277 Times in 1,264 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=policerevolvercollector;138711035]Are my eyes fooling me? Is it a 5 or a 6?
Just bought this. It'll be here in a few days. Maybe someone here has a screen with better pcture quality than mine.
I got out my trusty old magnifying glass, think it could possibly be a deep stamped 3 or 5 on the butt? Will try to add pictures of ser.#'s from a 1919 MP of mine. Some of the same digits to compare. Hope this will help.
__________________
Just a shooter
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-29-2015, 02:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 10,411
Liked 6,940 Times in 2,352 Posts
|
|
I have very good corrected vision and it looks like a deeply stamped 3 or 5 to me also, it just doesn't look like a 6 at all. Understanding the rest of the tell-tales as mentioned above would lead you to want to believe it is a 6 but if its a 6 it was stamped with a die that doesn't match the characteristics of the rest of the series, like cursive as opposed to print.
I've been wrong before...purchasing a '49 Harley that had the engine boss shaved and restamped. When I asked the guy why the numbers looked as ****** as they did, he just shrugged and said "They did them in a hurry with no regard to whether or not they were in a line."
Last edited by Kinman; 09-29-2015 at 02:38 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-29-2015, 03:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,701 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
I'm stuck on six, and I will continue to believe that until the cows come home -- which is an oblique way of saying "all day," to use the term in the sense it carries in the lifer wings of our leading penitentiaries.
I don't say "six" because I can read it unambiguously, but because I deduce it. My thinking remains what it was in post no. 5 above.
__________________
David Wilson
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|