|
|
09-23-2016, 03:08 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 564
Likes: 3,643
Liked 4,249 Times in 436 Posts
|
|
A 1954 Highway Patrolman for only $85!
The only problem is ... you need a time machine to take you back to 1954!
Stumbled upon this short article about the Highway Patrolman's debut. Thought y'all would find it interesting. Boston Globe, April 20, 1954. Happy reading!
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 6,287
Liked 7,472 Times in 2,287 Posts
|
|
hmm...to powerful for city cops or private citizens. I want one
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central Florida
Posts: 798
Likes: 1,203
Liked 1,015 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
That weapon must be a heck of a lot more powerful than those that were later sold to the private citizens. How much power must it have had to pass through the rear of the car, through the driver, through the engine block, and still keep going. Howitzer, perhaps?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:32 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NW OH
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 3,242
Liked 2,430 Times in 809 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdavis
That weapon must be a heck of a lot more powerful than those that were later sold to the private citizens. How much power must it have had to pass through the rear of the car, through the driver, through the engine block, and still keep going. Howitzer, perhaps?
|
Must have been a Ford with a small block engine.
$85 in 1954 is roughly $760 in today's dollars. That is still a bargain.
__________________
Inconsistently consistent
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 232
Likes: 720
Liked 269 Times in 129 Posts
|
|
Well, Hellstrom still ended up selling to cops and civilians.
Last edited by 2ffat; 09-25-2016 at 03:43 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 11,150
Liked 12,127 Times in 1,938 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peak53
hmm...to powerful for city cops or private citizens. I want one
|
And so the San Antonio (TX) PD adopts the Model 58 in 41 magnum. I guess things just needed to be bigger in south Texas than Boston...
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 04:37 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,316
Likes: 33,979
Liked 10,983 Times in 3,958 Posts
|
|
Quote:
What cost $85 in 1954 would cost $757.00 in 2015.
What cost $110 in 1954 would cost $979.65 in 2015.
|
In another thread, a member posted that his local shop had a NIB 4" HP with tools for about $600. Granted, that was a great deal. But $757 shouldn't be too much off the mark for an HP NIB in 2016 if you look long enough.
Less than a thousand for a NIB M27 might be a stretch. Amazing that the price differential of $25 back then has swollen to near $250 now, but that just shows how much less money is worth these days.
My general rule of thumb is multiply prices from the '50s or '60s by ten and you get today's price. Not too far off in this case.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 05:07 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Martin, Alabama
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2,193
Liked 3,245 Times in 830 Posts
|
|
Now lets look at deflation. Back then, a .357 Magnum would go through the back of the car. through the driver of the car, and all the way though the engine block and I assume the radiator and would still be going.
In 2016 you would need a Fifty caliber to accomplish the same.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 07:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 29,586
Liked 23,017 Times in 5,789 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdavis
That weapon must be a heck of a lot more powerful than those that were later sold to the private citizens. How much power must it have had to pass through the rear of the car, through the driver, through the engine block, and still keep going. Howitzer, perhaps?
|
Over the last 50 years the .357 Magnum load has been so reduced in power that it’s nothing close to the power produced by the original factory load.
At one time I had a Smith and Wesson advertisement, for the .357 Magnum revolver, this ad specked the ,357 Magnum round at 1,575 FPS and 800 foot pounds of energy from an 8 3/8” barrel. That’s a lot of power
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 07:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Likes: 209
Liked 116 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
There was a argument on another forum a while back when a fellow posted that today's +P+ is close to what the normal loads were back in the day. He said SAAMI specs have been lowered repeatedly over the years for both the .38 and .357. I have no idea if it's true or not but he was standing his ground while a few other's poo-poo'ed what he was saying.
Interesting article, thanks for posting 357!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 08:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 29,586
Liked 23,017 Times in 5,789 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWW
There was a argument on another forum a while back when a fellow posted that today's +P+ is close to what the normal loads were back in the day. He said SAAMI specs have been lowered repeatedly over the years for both the .38 and .357. I have no idea if it's true or not but he was standing his ground while a few other's poo-poo'ed what he was saying.
Interesting article, thanks for posting 357!
|
First there is no current SAAMI spec for the 38 special +P+ round. There may be for other calibers, but none I know of. That is why +P+ ammo can be so iffy.
Second, if I remember correctly the 38 special SAAMI max pressures have been lowered by 3 - 4 thousand PSI. The SAAMI max pressure has been lowered even more than that.
Third, if you feel the need for safe but smoking hot factory ammo try the Underwood brand.
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 08:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWW
There was a argument on another forum a while back when a fellow posted that today's +P+ is close to what the normal loads were back in the day. He said SAAMI specs have been lowered repeatedly over the years for both the .38 and .357. I have no idea if it's true or not but he was standing his ground while a few other's poo-poo'ed what he was saying.
Interesting article, thanks for posting 357!
|
It's difficult to say just how much the .357 MV has declined over the years, as there is no good basis for comparing of the MV figures which have been published over the years.
1938 Remington Catalog, 158 grain metal point - 1510 fps, from an 8-3/4" barrel
1943 Western Ammunition Handbook, 158 grain metal point, also 1510 fps from an 8-3/4" barrel
1960 Winchester catalog, 158 grain lead bullet - 1400 fps, no barrel length provided
1976 W-W catalog, 158 grain lead bullet - 1450 fps, from 8-3/8" barrel
1978 Remington catalog, 158 grain metal point - 1235 fps, from a 4" VENTED barrel.
Note that the Metal Point bullets are equivalent to lead bullets as their driving surface is lead.
Someone would need to round up some early ammunition and some late ammunition and chronograph it from the same gun(s) to get good comparative data. My guess is that the .357's MV has not declined that much over time.
Last edited by DWalt; 09-23-2016 at 08:04 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 09:44 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdavis
That weapon must be a heck of a lot more powerful than those that were later sold to the private citizens. How much power must it have had to pass through the rear of the car, through the driver, through the engine block, and still keep going. Howitzer, perhaps?
|
Handloads.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 10:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Over the last 50 years the .357 Magnum load has been so reduced in power that it’s nothing close to the power produced by the original factory load.
|
It didn't take them nearly that long to do that to the 10mm. Yep, we're living in different times now.
Bruce
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 10:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 104,950
Liked 22,296 Times in 4,529 Posts
|
|
357magster:
Wonderful clipping. I think that the word for that description is "hyperbole"... But great advertising. "This thing is too powerful for ordinary folks"... That would make me want one!!! I've heard folks recite that line about passing through automobiles including the engine block since I was a kid. Now we know where it came from!!
Thanks for sharing.
Best Regards, Les
__________________
SWCA 3084, SWHF 495, PGCA 3064
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 10:44 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
My first house was $29,999. In 1976. In 2010 the value was $300k.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-23-2016, 10:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 31,497
Liked 22,512 Times in 4,626 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdavis
That weapon must be a heck of a lot more powerful than those that were later sold to the private citizens. How much power must it have had to pass through the rear of the car, through the driver, through the engine block, and still keep going. Howitzer, perhaps?
|
Remember, these are 1954 cars......
The bullet wouldn't have to go thru 5 computers and
two sets of air bags.
Cranking em' out at 200 a day !!!
Back when we still had machinists and skilled tool and die
makers.
Chuck
__________________
They hold no Quarter
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|