|
|
10-04-2016, 07:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Barrel detail - 1942 DSC M&P
Upon giving my newly acquired 1942 M&P a thorough cleaning I noticed an irregularity to the top of the barrel just aft of the front sight. My first thought was "Oh no - someone fired a second round into a lodged squib!!!" I inspected the bore and found no irregularity there , in fact the bore is excellent. Then I got smart and looked closely at the inscriptions on the barrel top , thinking there must be a clue there. The letters on the raised surface are clearly much deeper than those which follow , indicating that the irregularity was in place prior to the stamping process , as opposed to the "bulge" having occurred after manufacturing and stamping were complete. An acceptable flaw during War time production.
No squib.
I do not know enough about the manufacturing process to understand how this came about. I do know that finish detail was not a priority during the War , as evidenced by the milling marks which are clearly evident. Reminds me of my P.38 German pistols , lots of milling marks.
Explanation will be appreciated.
|
10-04-2016, 08:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
I have noted "bulges" on the barrels of some of my Victories, but have come to realize that they are only the result of relaxed production standards during the war. Nothing to be concerned about. Yours looks like a nice example. Ron
|
10-04-2016, 08:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,483
Likes: 236
Liked 28,949 Times in 14,015 Posts
|
|
I'd agree it's just an inconsequential manufacturing defect.
|
10-04-2016, 09:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Agreed Ron. I ceased to be concerned when I realized that the flaw is original to the manufacturing process. I remain curious as to the machining procedure by which the barrel is shaped , and how such a flaw results.
|
10-04-2016, 10:37 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Inman, SC USA
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 95
Liked 649 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
The barrels started as a forging, then were milled to achieve the contours and leave the front sight and base and the lug for the ejector rod. The bore was then drilled and reamed, then rifled and the rear end turned in a lathe then threaded, and the hole for the front locking bolt and spring was drilled, as well as the hole for the cross pin that retains the locking bolt. After those operations, the roll marks were placed on the barrels. The final operation would have been polishing the barrels on large contoured buffing wheels prior to bluing. I have several barrels that are unpolished and in the white and they have uneven places on them where the machining operations changed directions. On peacetime production, the uneven places aren't so great and would have been polished smooth during the polishing step(s). I base the above on my machining experience and observations rather than any specific knowledge of the S&W process.
__________________
Tom
1560
|
10-04-2016, 11:20 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
During the war, barrels passed final inspection which would never have made it in peacetime.
Note the very noticable "bulge" on the BSR in the attached picture, to the left of the caliber stamping near the root of the barrel. It is very pronounced. After having it looked at by two gunsmiths just to be sure, the judgment was that nothing traumatic ever happened inside; the bore is just fine. It's just uneven outside shaping.
|
10-04-2016, 12:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
I've had several Victories that show a similar "bulge" as in Absalom's photo and I was worried at first until I examined the bore which showed no abnormalities. I guess that anything can happen when hurried production is necessary. Ron
|
03-06-2017, 09:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Join the club. I was concerned until I realized that the roll mark was applied AFTER the bulge was left in place during manufacturing.
Adds character , along with the milling marks on the trigger guard.
Edit - Sorry , I screwed up --- this should have been posted in the thread started by Alvin50.
Last edited by Waveski; 03-06-2017 at 04:09 PM.
|
03-06-2017, 10:31 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
How about some examples of the grip frames on the Victory or BSRs. I am guessing they had relaxed standards as well.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
09-14-2020, 10:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Another Bulbous Barrel ---
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|