|
|
01-17-2017, 05:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Combat Masterpiece in nickel ... original or not???
Some years back , when I knew a lot less about handguns than I now know , I saw a Smith & Wesson revolver in the LGS and went all ga-ga over it. Had to have it. Never gave a moment's thought to the originality of the nickel finish - had to have it. Since then I have learned a lot , much of that knowledge coming from this excellent forum. I look at my .38 and think , well ......
Today is the day of reckoning.
Ser# K 281552. ('56/'57 , I think.) No "N" stamp present.
Front sight is nickel plated.
So , give it to me straight - Is my Combat Masterpiece original or refinished? I'm all grown up now , I can take it.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-17-2017, 06:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 240
Liked 6,214 Times in 1,575 Posts
|
|
Combat Masterpiece in nickel ... original or not???
Well it should have had an N stamped on the face of the cylinder and on the butt frame when you remove the stocks. At least that is what I know.... and what is on my nickel SWs.But I am limited in what I know.
Last edited by moralem; 01-17-2017 at 06:15 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-17-2017, 06:18 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 8,075
Liked 12,164 Times in 2,774 Posts
|
|
More, and sharper, pictures would help in assessing originality. From what I can see, I'd say refinish. I'm making that call from the barrel stamping which does not appear to be sharp suggesting some buffing before a renickel. Pictures of the S&W logo and frame areas around the screws would be helpful. Either way, nice gun and a great shooter I expect.
Jeff
SWCA #1457
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-17-2017, 06:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 15,136
Likes: 91,873
Liked 26,394 Times in 8,414 Posts
|
|
Came up with a nickel 15-3 the same way
At least it was cheap!
|
01-17-2017, 06:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 4,047
Liked 2,541 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
Refinish IMHO. It appears to me that the corrosion on the hammer doesn't match the rest of the finish.
|
01-17-2017, 06:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 5,459
Liked 2,783 Times in 1,263 Posts
|
|
I think it's non-original. Something mangy is going on with that trigger and hammer which I think should be case colored.
Post both sides of the naked grip frame and someone will divine the markings.
__________________
Just Say No - To Social Media
|
01-17-2017, 06:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,630
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
Without the N stamp(s), it's probably not original.
K 281552 probably shipped around late 1956-early 1957. Your original assumption is correct.
|
01-17-2017, 09:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Knowing what to look for , I have collected some damning evidence. Let's get this over with.
After viewing the five images I do not expect the jury to be out very long.
|
01-17-2017, 09:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1,449
Liked 4,519 Times in 1,935 Posts
|
|
I think you know the answer.... that is not a factory nickel gun...
|
01-17-2017, 09:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 9,227
Liked 6,396 Times in 2,220 Posts
|
|
Well, the extractor star is a correct blue color, but everything else points to the refinish, especially the lack of any "N" stamps and the closeup of the sideplate with the rounded edges.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-17-2017, 09:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3,512
Liked 1,578 Times in 912 Posts
|
|
Whichever it is, I'd keep shooting and enjoying it.
After all, it is still a Combat Masterpiece, one of the sweetest .38s ever made.
__________________
What would Jim Cirillo do?
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-17-2017, 11:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
|
|
Would a factory nickel revolver have the front sight blade nickeled?
|
01-17-2017, 11:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 1,605
Liked 6,323 Times in 2,298 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 824tsv
Would a factory nickel revolver have the front sight blade nickeled?
|
Mine is, and I know it's original because I bought it new in the gray box.
|
01-18-2017, 12:13 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 4,013
Liked 5,305 Times in 1,444 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 824tsv
Would a factory nickel revolver have the front sight blade nickeled?
|
From what K frames I have looked at, pre model and model marked 17-18-19s have had the black front sight. At some -2s I see both and at -3 all nickel.
The N stamp on the frame most often, but on the cylinder is hit or miss.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-18-2017, 12:20 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 3,604
Liked 2,014 Times in 535 Posts
|
|
I have a 1957 shipped with nickel finish, Combat Masterpiece and it doesn't have the N on the cylinder, but it DOES have the N stamped on the left side of the grip frame. Also has a blue front sight. Don't know if this helps.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-18-2017, 08:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
I'd say that the image showing the lower letters of REG US PAT OFF beneath the Smith & Wesson logo being partially buffed away pretty much nails it. I could possibly kid myself through the lack of the N stamp , but the combination of the different bits of evidence appears overwhelming.
So , I have to look at it the following way --- Gaga is not the best basis upon which to make a decision. That said , I was so smitten with the appearance , proportions and feel of the K38 that I just had to have it , and I still feel that way. The biggest benefit to me is that this revolver is the one with which I became a reasonably good shooter. It is just so easy and intuitive to put rounds on target - this is the first handgun with which I developed confidence. How does one put a price on confidence? Also - it was my first K frame , my introduction to the ideal frame size for the .38 special round. (My favorite frame size to date, all manufacturers included.) To this day the old nickel Smith is a head turner on the range.
It is still a nice old gun ; a fabulous shooter. It's a keeper. HOWEVER - I won't get fooled again.
My thanks to the jury.
Last edited by Waveski; 01-18-2017 at 09:04 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|