Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2017, 09:31 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's

We've seen in current threads that S&W began using heat-treated cylinders on .38 Special M&P guns in Sept., 1919.


I get the impression that some feel this makes guns made after that date to be safe with Plus P ammo.


I'm sure they are safer from a blowup or a cracked cylinder, but frames and yokes were not changed metallurgically , were they?


If not, frequent use of hot ammo is going to cause cylinder endshake sooner than with later guns, made of improved steels and current heat treatment .


Keep in mind that some hot ammo is hotter than the rest . Buffalo Bore is surely loaded to higher pressures than most.


This is why I sometimes caution against Plus P in old .38's, despite what some have said about blowups not happening in their vintage revolvers.


Just a thought...

Last edited by Texas Star; 01-17-2017 at 09:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 01-17-2017, 10:00 PM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

I cannot relate to people who would want to shoot +P out of older guns, frequently or otherwise.

As you indicate, hot ammo may be safe for the operator of the moment, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily good for the long term health of the gun.

Regardless of the pre- or post-hardened cylinder cut-off, on an old gun one never knows what the gun has been through, or rather what has been through the gun, during the previous decades or even century. The next round could be the one that breaks the camel's back. Out of all my collectible revolvers, I've always used only mild lead wadcutter target loads. A few post-war M&P's have served as home-defense back-up loaded with modern +P hollow points, and I'm sure they'd handle those just fine, but I just don't see the point of shooting hot loads for the heck of it.

Anyone who wants more noise and recoil should just get a .357 Magnum.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-17-2017, 10:08 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's Plus P Ammo in Post 1919 .38's  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

I do see a very significant need for Plus P, and some such loads can add 200 FPS or more over std. pressure ammo.


For self defense, including hiking where a man armed only with a .38 may encounter dangerous animals, I think Plus P can be a real blessing.


But I agree with Absalom that ROUTINE use of Plus P at a range or to shoot tin cans is not the best way to conserve gun life without repairs.


Still, some do that, and if an old .38 is in the family, it may be shot that way. I just wanted all here to be aware of the issues that can arise in such a situation.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ammo advice in 1919 M&P 38 special WV_guy S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 5 01-22-2015 03:12 PM
1919 Colt Lee Barner Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 15 01-26-2013 07:05 PM
WTB browning 1919 hjf73 WANTED to Buy 0 10-04-2012 09:16 PM
1919 Poster 29-1 The Lounge 17 02-25-2011 08:44 AM
1919 m&p stinkycat S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 07-13-2009 12:08 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)