|
|
03-16-2017, 07:36 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Pre 25
There is a pre 25 in the giant collection that looks correct except the serial number is S 130XXX. The S&W bible says they started at S 143XXX is the bible wrong or is S&W being their normal self.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-16-2017, 07:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 266
Liked 2,564 Times in 465 Posts
|
|
Could be a pre model 26. Those start at S76212.
__________________
George Jamison
Last edited by gjamison; 03-16-2017 at 07:47 PM.
|
03-16-2017, 07:48 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,525
Likes: 89,698
Liked 24,883 Times in 8,520 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjamison
Could be a pre model 26.
|
It could be a 1950 .45 Target that has been fitted with a 1955 heavy barrel.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
03-16-2017, 07:49 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
It's a heavy barrel with 1955 on the barrel.
|
03-16-2017, 07:52 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Didn't see the last post. It is unfired and all of the serial numbers are the same with no signs of any work being done to it.
|
03-16-2017, 08:01 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,525
Likes: 89,698
Liked 24,883 Times in 8,520 Posts
|
|
There have been a few 1950s show up that were sent back to the factory to receive the heavier 1955 barrel. S&W would have numbered the new barrel to the frame.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
03-16-2017, 08:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,610
Likes: 240
Liked 29,114 Times in 14,077 Posts
|
|
The pre-25 (Model 1955) was first released in early 1955, and the SN at that time would have been in the neighborhood of S13xxxx. Your SN could easily be correct. SN S 143xxx would probably have been made a little later. But I don't have any information about the SN of the first 1955. Or yours could have been a 1950 with a heavy barrel grafted onto it.
|
03-16-2017, 08:09 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Is there a diamond following the serial # under the barrel?
Is there a star following the serial # on the butt?
Is there a date on the left grip frame at the bottom near the toe with stock panel removed?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
03-16-2017, 08:09 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
No star or date indicating any factory work. The thing really is brand new so I doubt it would have been rebarreled before it was fired.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-16-2017, 08:21 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Just checked again no stars or anything not an inspectors mark.
Last edited by oger; 03-16-2017 at 08:34 PM.
|
03-16-2017, 08:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 701
Likes: 919
Liked 1,926 Times in 331 Posts
|
|
Curious if it has serial matching non-relieved Diamond Target Stocks? It's plausible to have a few 1955s in the 130,000 range. I think I've read of a few here before. Also if you are allowed to check the stocks, then you'll see if it has a "W" spring.
|
03-16-2017, 08:56 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,880
Likes: 981
Liked 18,995 Times in 9,295 Posts
|
|
Easy to figure out, post a ship date request to the SWHF Historian and he will let you know if it left the factory as a 1955, a 1950 or a something else.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-16-2017, 10:01 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
The diamond targets are relieved and are not serial numbered. Already requested a ship date from Roy. There is still a pile of stuff coming out collection maybe a box he saved most of the boxes but everything is mixed up and there is a set of non relieved targets will take a look to see if they have serial numbers on them.
|
03-16-2017, 10:05 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
My 6.5" 5 screw Model of 1955 45acp is S130745
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
|
03-16-2017, 10:36 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Yours is older mine S130961. Guess the book is wrong.
|
03-16-2017, 11:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,610
Likes: 240
Liked 29,114 Times in 14,077 Posts
|
|
I think it's possible that a frame in the S130K range could have been used to make up a 1955.
|
03-16-2017, 11:34 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 271
Likes: 39
Liked 128 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
My 1955 is #1308xx.
|
03-17-2017, 02:52 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
This situation just continues to prove two adages:
1. Books are obsolete almost the moment they're printed.
2. The lowest known serial # is only that until a lower # is discovered.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-17-2017, 08:53 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,402
Likes: 1,322
Liked 30,443 Times in 4,369 Posts
|
|
Most collectors place too much importance on serial numbers when it comes to age of a revolver. S&W made and shipped models out of serial number order. The first 1955 45 Target could have a serial number in the S143000 range, but revolvers completed and shipped later had lower serial numbers in the S130000 range.
Some of the early 44 Magnums had serial numbers in the S160000-S166000 range, but many with lower serial numbers in the S153000 range were shipped much later in 1956 and well into 1957.
Once you have acquired enough data, you can draw general conclusions about serial numbers and when most were shipped, but it does not help you with a particular gun.
Bill
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-17-2017, 10:45 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Like I said on the first post. It's S&W being S&W, there is no reason to ship weapons in numerical order.
|
03-17-2017, 12:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,610
Likes: 240
Liked 29,114 Times in 14,077 Posts
|
|
It's not just the shipping which can be out of order, but also the manufacturing. Very possible that a batch of SNed frames could be put back for some reason and recovered later for assembly, after frames with a later SN had already been shipped.
|
03-17-2017, 01:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 122
Likes: 54
Liked 495 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-17-2017, 02:33 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,402
Likes: 1,322
Liked 30,443 Times in 4,369 Posts
|
|
Frames were made and serial numbered, fitted with a side plate and yoke and then stored until a build order for a particular model (44 Magnum, 55 Target, .357 Magnum) was issued. Frames were taken purely at random and this resulted in frames with higher numbers being made into finished revolvers while the lower numbered frames still sat in storage. This contributed significantly to the shipping of guns with higher serial numbers first.
Also, since revolvers did not have a shelf life (expiry date like food or drugs) there was no need to ship on a first in first out basis.
Bill
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-17-2017, 02:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
This situation just continues to prove two adages:
1. Books are obsolete almost the moment they're printed.
2. The lowest known serial # is only that until a lower # is discovered.
|
Maybe the Catalog of S&W should have the pages in a binder with a semi annual or annual supplement sold?
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-17-2017, 02:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
I saw a pre 29 S13074x serial that was a few number from mine
EDIT:many of the 3" Model 66-2 have an AHLxxxx serial but the AHL is not mentioned in the catalog at all.
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
Last edited by StakeOut; 03-17-2017 at 03:03 PM.
|
03-17-2017, 03:11 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StakeOut
Maybe the Catalog of S&W should have the pages in a binder with a semi annual or annual supplement sold?
|
Truly an excellent idea. For one thing, after the 1st printing of any edition a correction list is prepared but cumbersome to use or to copy all the corrections into the book.
New binder pages would be much easier for that as well.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
03-27-2017, 10:08 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Just got the shipping date Jan 1959. It appears S&W can leave frames lying around for quite a while before using them.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|