|
|
03-24-2017, 03:31 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,107 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
U.S.P.O./S&WHF DOCUMENT
I have a 38 S&W Terrier shipped to U.S.P.O. October 1951.
I was advised that Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation had scanned documents through early 1950's so I submitted the factory letter and received a copy of the original invoice showing 1,000 guns in the shipment.
The one I have is not stamped as invoice shows.
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
The Following 19 Users Like Post:
|
19leben, 357magster, Absalom, Collects, DCWilson, DGT, Frank46, g-dad, Kansasgunner, kwill1911, lamarw, Lee Barner, MSgt G, old bear, OldK22, opoefc, RKmesa, Watchdog, Wiregrassguy |
03-24-2017, 04:14 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Well, that opens the door to contemplating the interesting options:
Was S&W sloppy and did not stamp all the guns they shipped?
Was the stamping surgically removed before surplussing the gun from government service and the spot refinished professionally?
Did someone retire the gun from official service illegally and remove the stamping to avoid drawing attention to the fact that he had a government gun?
I assume the stamping would have been on the backstrap. Have you seen a specimen with stamping so you know what it would have looked like? A microscopic inspection of that area might be in order .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-24-2017, 04:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,113
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,318 Times in 4,239 Posts
|
|
Hi:
Right out of High School I worked for the Post Office as a "Tem Employee". The carriers of registered mail drew a handgun from supply before leaving the building. There were several different types of revolvers from S&W / Colt Model 1917s, H&R .38s, S&Ws, and Colt 2" .38s. The carriers that left early were issued the small revolvers and the last ones to leave got the Model 1917s.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-24-2017, 05:04 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,066
Likes: 923
Liked 9,963 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Surely to goodness you don't expect ANYTHING involving a government agency to make a whole lot of sense, do you? That would almost have to be against the laws of nature, wouldn't it?
Ralph Tremaine
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-24-2017, 05:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,629
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
I once read that the USPO had .38 S&W ammunition that had some special headstamp to identify it, but have never been able to verify that. Has anyone ever seen any?
|
03-24-2017, 05:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,107 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
I emailed invoice to Roy Jinks and he advised that there was a mix of commercial models in the shipment so not all were stamped.
No sign of refinishing on my gun.
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
03-24-2017, 05:54 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,015
Likes: 8,994
Liked 48,763 Times in 9,260 Posts
|
|
Maybe the Post Office lost the marking?????
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-24-2017, 06:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman
I emailed invoice to Roy Jinks and he advised that there was a mix of commercial models in the shipment so not all were stamped.
...
|
Awwww.... once again, exciting speculation shot down by drab old reality .
|
03-24-2017, 07:34 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Martin, Alabama
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2,195
Liked 3,245 Times in 830 Posts
|
|
I found the invoice interesting in and of itself. Who would of thought the Federal Post Office would of been paying excise tax? I would of thought the Post Office would of been exempt from paying taxes.
|
03-24-2017, 08:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamarw
I found the invoice interesting in and of itself. Who would of thought the Federal Post Office would of been paying excise tax? I would of thought the Post Office would of been exempt from paying taxes.
|
It's an excise tax, which could have been federal or state (I'm sure tax laws have changed since then), but in any case, it's a tax the producer, in this case S&W, pays and is expected to pass on to the customer, so I suppose it doesn't matter who it is.
What I find much cuter is that shipping on a 1000 guns (calculate the weight alone, not to talk of packaging and handling) apparently cost a measly $6.60.
Last edited by Absalom; 03-24-2017 at 08:18 PM.
|
03-25-2017, 12:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 630
Likes: 292
Liked 573 Times in 249 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
It's an excise tax, which could have been federal or state (I'm sure tax laws have changed since then), but in any case, it's a tax the producer, in this case S&W, pays and is expected to pass on to the customer, so I suppose it doesn't matter who it is.
What I find much cuter is that shipping on a 1000 guns (calculate the weight alone, not to talk of packaging and handling) apparently cost a measly $6.60.
|
Even in today's dollars it would be roughly $65.94.
|
03-25-2017, 12:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 828
Likes: 2,296
Liked 1,189 Times in 438 Posts
|
|
Up into the mid 1980's, ramp clerks at the bigger airports were issued revolvers when they received certain shipments by air. At one point I asked for training on the guns and was told it was ramp clerks only and with my junior seniority I'd never get a ramp job.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-25-2017, 12:55 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1775usmarine
Even in today's dollars it would be roughly $65.94.
|
Yep. That'd cover the shipping charges for maybe two guns you buy on Gunbroker these days. Good deal. I always thought the government just got ripped off, on $1000 toilet seats and such .
|
03-25-2017, 01:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 1,005
Liked 4,517 Times in 1,240 Posts
|
|
Here is what is missing:
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-25-2017, 02:42 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,015
Likes: 8,994
Liked 48,763 Times in 9,260 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamarw
I found the invoice interesting in and of itself. Who would of thought the Federal Post Office would of been paying excise tax? I would of thought the Post Office would of been exempt from paying taxes.
|
I did not think they would have to. I wonder if that is a mistake that was rectified later.
In the 80s and 90s, a friend was in the commercial reloading and ammo manufacturing business. There was an 11% FEDERAL excise tax on new guns and ammo that the manufacturer had to collect.
Police departments and other government agencies were exempt.
I have seen exemption forms printed by S&W for police and other gov agencies to fill out and avoid the tax. That is one reason we see such low prices on some Reg Mag invoices.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Last edited by handejector; 03-25-2017 at 02:43 PM.
|
03-25-2017, 04:38 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,107 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
KWILL can you advise serial number of the gun shown ?
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
03-25-2017, 04:45 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 1,005
Liked 4,517 Times in 1,240 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman
KWILL can you advise serial number of the gun shown ?
|
It isn't my gun but the SN is 59817. Is yours 63663?
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
03-25-2017, 04:49 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,107 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
KWILL:Wondered what number was used, serial number or PO specified one.
The grips on the gun look to be pre war style, mine are post war.
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
03-25-2017, 04:56 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 1,005
Liked 4,517 Times in 1,240 Posts
|
|
Used where? Not many of these turn up but I've documented lots of the Colt Banker's Specials that the Railway Mail Service used prior to WWII. S&W tried multiple times to undercut Colt's price but only succeeded a couple of times. If the Smith's are like the Colts there is no correlation of the issue number to the serial number.
Could you confirm your serial number please?
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
03-25-2017, 05:10 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,876
Liked 9,107 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
KWILL: 63663
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
03-25-2017, 06:04 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 1,005
Liked 4,517 Times in 1,240 Posts
|
|
Although there were over 25,000 small Colt revolvers (mostly, but not exclusively, Banker's Specials) and 1,500 or so Terriers sold to the Post Office, they are rarely seen. Why? Almost all of them were reported as "lost." In the 1920s and 1930s the Colt's were issued a neat little valise with compartments for the holster, belt, ammo and work documents.
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
03-25-2017, 06:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Message deleted because I misremembered the date, but those who quoted me below will preserve the mistake. 56073 actually shipped a year earlier, in October 1950.
I will letter it anyway.
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 03-25-2017 at 06:45 PM.
Reason: Correct a mistaken premise
|
03-25-2017, 06:21 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 1,005
Liked 4,517 Times in 1,240 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCWilson
Hmmm. In my safe is Terrier 56073, also shipped in October 1951 and also not carrying a P.O. stamp. If a thousand of them went out that month to a single buyer, and perhaps only a few dozen to other recipients, you've got to ask yourself: what are the odds?
I never ordered a letter on my Terrier, so I don't know where it was shipped. I guess that is now one of the things I will do with the rest of today.
|
I second the motion.
BTW, what kind of grips (stocks) are on your gun?
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
03-25-2017, 06:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,629
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCWilson
Hmmm. In my safe is Terrier 56073, also shipped in October 1951 and also not carrying a P.O. stamp..
|
Earlier you said October 1950. So which is correct?
"Nice score! The prewar and early postwar Terriers are some of my favorite S&W products. My only postwar is 56073, which shipped in October 1950. It has the wrong stocks on it, but is otherwise identical to yours."
|
03-25-2017, 06:50 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwill1911
I second the motion.
BTW, what kind of grips (stocks) are on your gun?
|
Not that it matters now because of the corrected shipping date, but they are round butt magnas like the ones on the OP's Terrier. Mine are not numbered to the gun and instead carry the lower serial number 10246, which is not a possible Terrier number for the era. A 1950 Terrier should have had round butt service stocks. I suspect the magnas now on mine were repurposed after removal from (probably) an early Chiefs Special.
__________________
David Wilson
|
03-25-2017, 06:58 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
Earlier you said October 1950. So which is correct?
"Nice score! The prewar and early postwar Terriers are some of my favorite S&W products. My only postwar is 56073, which shipped in October 1950. It has the wrong stocks on it, but is otherwise identical to yours."
|
Earlier post in this thread corrected.
__________________
David Wilson
|
03-25-2017, 08:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lincoln Co. NC
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 8,507
Liked 3,677 Times in 1,228 Posts
|
|
I really like these little guns and the invoice the OP has is great to see. Here's mine with stocks numbered to the gun shipped 9/50
__________________
Dan
Ps 96 SWCA 2930 SWHF 524
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|