|
|
05-23-2017, 04:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
New to me today
Last date on the barrel is '14. 5", half moon front sight, 38 Special, grips without medallion, S/N 9612XX.
If I have my terminology right.....Model of 1905, 4th change, probably mid 1920's.
Seemed very nice to me so I paid for it and here I am requesting verification or refutation; whichever is applicable. Please tell me about this old girl. 3 pics if I can get them posted.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-23-2017, 04:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 34,555
Liked 10,739 Times in 3,659 Posts
|
|
The ejector Rod is post-war. Are you sure you didn't leave an S off that serial number.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-23-2017, 04:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Yes, there is an "S" several spaces away, like clear over in the corner.
OK, I see where the grips aren't for this later gun. Thanks.
|
05-23-2017, 04:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Indeed. A 5" barrel on a 961-serial from 1942 would indicate a parts gun, as by that time only 4" Victory-style revolvers were produced in .38 Special. In view of the round front sight, it can only be an S-prefix.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guesser
....
OK, I see where the grips aren't for this later gun. Thanks.
|
Those actually aren't factory grips at all; they are aftermarket. S&W did not make magna tops without medallions; the 1920s non-medallion stocks had rounded tops.
Last edited by Absalom; 05-23-2017 at 04:30 PM.
|
05-23-2017, 05:37 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,478
Likes: 5,112
Liked 18,982 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Yes, Absalom my friend, it is actually S9612xx (see post #3).
It is in the midst of a run of 5" revolvers in the S961xxx range. They were shipping in the first half of 1948. What is interesting is that this part of the S serial range runs rather wild. In the S961xxx to S970xxx segment, I show guns shipping anywhere from December, 1947, to June, 1948, with no distinguishable pattern. Before you get to the S960s, there is a fairly dependable pattern with only the occasional flier. Not so in this range.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
05-23-2017, 06:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,479
Likes: 236
Liked 28,940 Times in 14,012 Posts
|
|
FWIW, the two closest SNs on my list are S9613xx shipping in 1/48 and S9618xx shipping in 12/47. Yours is probably close. It's a postwar Military and Police model, made shortly before the long action was changed to a short action, creating the so-called "pre-Model 10". BTW, the last known use of the barrel-shaped extractor rod knob on the M&P is thought to be at around SN S903xxx (not to say that lower SNs cannot have the knurled rod tip), so yours is well into the knurled rod tip era.
Last edited by DWalt; 05-23-2017 at 07:35 PM.
|
05-23-2017, 09:20 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Death Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 13,885
Liked 8,963 Times in 1,396 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Smith & Wesson Forum. Great start!
__________________
Living a dream - S&WCA #2364
|
05-23-2017, 10:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Thank you for the info. I realize S&W numbers are hard to pin down. So Post WW II, I don't mind at all. it is a nice gun and tight. Can anyone direct me to or post a pic of the correct for period grips??
|
05-24-2017, 12:19 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guesser
......Can anyone direct me to or post a pic of the correct for period grips??
|
The attached picture is S961030 with original stocks.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-24-2017, 03:55 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,478
Likes: 5,112
Liked 18,982 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Guesser
Absalom's picture is correct. Notice that the upper shoulder on the stocks go high and then drop off sharply to the frame. The shoulder is not tapered as the later Magna stocks are, beginning in about 1953.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
05-24-2017, 04:46 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,774
Likes: 17,025
Liked 39,804 Times in 7,848 Posts
|
|
...had to be very near the end of the one line address...
__________________
A Country Boy Can Survive
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-24-2017, 08:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,479
Likes: 236
Liked 28,940 Times in 14,012 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParadiseRoad
...had to be very near the end of the one line address...
|
The four line address block engineering change order was issued in April of 1948. So this one's manufacture must pre-date that. My SN list indicates that the four line addresses seem to show up first on those M&Ps with 6/48 shipping dates. At least I don't show any four-line K-frames having earlier shipping dates.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-24-2017, 08:49 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The four line address block engineering change order was issued in April of 1948. So this one's manufacture must pre-date that. My SN list indicates that the four line addresses seem to show up first on those M&Ps with 6/48 shipping dates. At least I don't show any four-line K-frames having earlier shipping dates.
|
I seem to remember that we've discussed this before, but are there any S-prefix guns on record with the four-line? I have seen C-prefix guns with four-digit and (my memory once again is hazy) maybe even five-digit serials that still had the one-line.
|
05-24-2017, 09:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,479
Likes: 236
Liked 28,940 Times in 14,012 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
I seem to remember that we've discussed this before, but are there any S-prefix guns on record with the four-line? I have seen C-prefix guns with four-digit and (my memory once again is hazy) maybe even five-digit serials that still had the one-line.
|
Probably no S-series M&Ps (that weren't re-stamped during repair), as the first C-series was supposedly manufactured on 3/22/48, before the four-line engineering change order was issued. But it would be likely for an early C-series to have one line. I list C85xx as a one-liner.
|
05-24-2017, 10:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
This particular gun has a 2 line address/pat. date stamp.
|
05-24-2017, 10:31 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,782
Likes: 936
Liked 18,873 Times in 9,241 Posts
|
|
The "stamp" usually refers to the one on the lower, forward right frame - before 1948 it would have been Made in U.S.A. After this the "four-line".
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
05-24-2017, 10:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Thanks, learning....learning.....learning!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-24-2017, 11:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 8,671
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,342 Posts
|
|
I like the configuration of your revolver. I hope it gives you many years of enjoyment. I bet it shoots very well.
Jim
|
05-24-2017, 06:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Central Montana
Posts: 194
Likes: 30
Liked 78 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Was the 5" barrel as common as 4" & 6"??
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|