|
|
|
07-11-2017, 01:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Picked up a 1955 45 this weekend
Bought a nice 1955 45 cal 5 screw N Frame this weekend S144539. I'm guessing its a first year production 1955? Has some minor wear at the tip of the barrel from a holster and a small spot on the cylinder otherwise its perfect. I tried to get some pics of it. Even came with a "very nice" set of cokes! I wonder if it came this way originally. Wife wasn't too happy about it so I might have to sell it. I should have asked first. Thought I would share it with you all first. That's a lesson to all you married folks out there. Although I'm sure some of you have already learned this lesson and didn't tell me hahaha.
Last edited by Nighthawk0083; 07-14-2017 at 03:19 PM.
|
The Following 33 Users Like Post:
|
19leben, 357magster, 4barrel, 6518John, arjay, beagleye, bill skebeck, Cyrano, daddio202, deyomatic, DGT, eb07, Hugh WW, Kinman, kryten67, LEO918, mh51, model3sw, montezumaz, Muley Gil, Nasty Ned, nedlate, Nedroe, quinn, raljr1, RKmesa, S&WsRsweet, Shark Bait, SparkyAZ, usmc2427765, vonn, Watchdog, Wiregrassguy |
07-11-2017, 01:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Few more pictures
|
The Following 14 Users Like Post:
|
357magster, 4barrel, 6518John, bill skebeck, DGT, Kinman, model3sw, montezumaz, Muley Gil, S&WsRsweet, SparkyAZ, vonn, Watchdog, Wiregrassguy |
07-11-2017, 02:00 PM
|
|
S&W Historian
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 3,397
Liked 11,335 Times in 2,894 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighthawk0083
Bought a nice 1955 45 cal 5 screw N Frame this weekend S144539. I'm guessing its a first year production 1955? Has some minor wear at the tip of the barrel from a holster and a small spot on the cylinder otherwise its perfect. I tired to get some pics of it. Even came with a pristine set of cokes! I wonder if it came this way originally. Wife wasn't too happy about it so I might have to sell it. I should have asked first. Thought I would share it with you all first. That's a lesson to all you married folks out there. Although I'm sure some of you have already learned this lesson and didn't tell me hahaha.
|
Nice find. Your way off on the ship date though. I feel sorry for guys like you. Do what I did, marry a gun girl. Her dad worked at Savage Arms and she is a collector. She doesn't get angry when I buy a gun, she gets angry when I sell one. Been married 38 years to a great lady.
__________________
Don Mundell
|
The Following 16 Users Like Post:
|
357magster, amazingflapjack, bruce5781, Cyrano, H Richard, ImprovedModel56Fan, JSR III, LEO918, montezumaz, Muley Gil, Nedroe, red9, S&W Oldtimer, S&WsRsweet, Shark Bait, SVT28 |
07-11-2017, 02:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,631
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
S144539 would likely have shipped around late 1955-early 1956 but only a factory letter would tell you exactly. But it's virtually certain to be of 1955 manufacture as I show SN S1472xx as shipping in 1/56.
Last edited by DWalt; 07-11-2017 at 02:11 PM.
|
07-11-2017, 02:28 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 472
Liked 5,745 Times in 3,211 Posts
|
|
Problem with Wife is easy. Give her the check book and your pay check.
Set up your gun fund with extra cash from your activities. Problem
solved. Worked for me.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 03:54 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,804
Likes: 18,554
Liked 22,424 Times in 8,277 Posts
|
|
My gun money never goes through the checkbook.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 04:09 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cottage Grove,WI
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 1,540
Liked 5,518 Times in 1,650 Posts
|
|
If You sell it,Look me up!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 04:28 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,283 Times in 910 Posts
|
|
This gets into the sticky distinction between date of manufacture and date of shipment.
Let me give you another data point. My 1955 Target bears s/n S144516 which is 23 units ahead of your beauty. The records show that mine shipped in January 1958.
And yet another data point. My 1950 Target .44 Spl. (pre-24) bears s/n S145147. It shipped in April 1955.
They can be all over the map.
Yours is a beautiful revolver. I'm sure if you decide to sell it you will have an enthusiastic reception. I quit giving marriage counseling long ago, so I'll keep my trap shut on that.
Curl
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 04:36 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Gods waiting room, W/C FL
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 3,334
Liked 4,549 Times in 2,011 Posts
|
|
NICE GUN FOR SURE.
You didn't mention what you paid. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have that in my gun safe, BUT "pristine & perfect" are words I don't throw around lightly. " IF IT DIDN'T HAVE'S" don't count. IF the Queen did have, she'd be King. There should be a sticky for rat holling $ for guns.
Last edited by nachogrande; 07-11-2017 at 08:38 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 05:50 PM
|
|
S&W Historian
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 3,397
Liked 11,335 Times in 2,894 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
S144539 would likely have shipped around late 1955-early 1956 but only a factory letter would tell you exactly. But it's virtually certain to be of 1955 manufacture as I show SN S1472xx as shipping in 1/56.
|
Sorry, your guessing is getting worse.
__________________
Don Mundell
|
07-11-2017, 05:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 266
Liked 2,564 Times in 465 Posts
|
|
Great gun and very nice condition! I buy guns almost every week, my wife wouldn't dare say a word, then again she collects US military long guns.
__________________
George Jamison
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 06:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 10,415
Liked 6,948 Times in 2,355 Posts
|
|
Beautiful ain't they...mine makes me smile when I shoot it, whats not to like. And Cokes too...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 06:56 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,539 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
I doubt a 1955 45 Target would sit in inventory for three years (in the case of the January 1958 gun). Most likely it was made within a "reasonable" time before it was shipped. Since S&W shared frames and the serial number sequence between N-frame models, it is not surprising a group of guns with lower serial numbers was made and shipped long after expected. Same is true for the 44 Magnum.
How this happens may be a good topic to be presented at the next symposium of the S&WCA.
Bill
Last edited by Doc44; 07-11-2017 at 06:59 PM.
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 07:51 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighthawk0083
Picked up a 1955 45 this weekend
|
I picked up a really nice 25-5 over the weekend.
But I couldn't afford it, so I had to put it back down.
That's a beautiful gun you have there. Hate to see you have to sell it, but have no doubt you'd have plenty of people wanting it. Really, it's more than just a "nice one" in my eyes.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 08:35 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,545
Likes: 89,875
Liked 24,933 Times in 8,534 Posts
|
|
I feel sorry for you. I had a wife like that. The key word is HAD. The current Mrs Muley is more like Don's wife; only gets mad if I sell one. She's a keeper.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 08:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: east tennessee, union co
Posts: 176
Likes: 85
Liked 114 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Beautiful, if I want a gun, wife just says buy it, she never questions my purchases of guns.
|
07-11-2017, 08:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sunny Central Florida
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 334
Liked 993 Times in 378 Posts
|
|
None the less, It's good to have a "gun budget" and a "shoe budget". You get to spend the "gun budget". She gets to spend the "shoe budget". Neither of you get to influence the others budget. I'd be willing to bet she buys her shoes out of general funds and you prolly never realized she spends twice as much money annually on shoes than you do on guns.
Of course, substitute her favorite hobby for shoes unless it actually is shoes. Naturally, purses are in the shoe budget.
__________________
NRA Benefactor
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 09:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
Sorry you have to ask, brother. Be strong. Nice gun!
|
07-11-2017, 09:04 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 12,714
Liked 13,462 Times in 3,396 Posts
|
|
I'd say it didn't happen to come with those Cokes judging by the size of the football cutout. Good luck in keeping it.
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
|
07-11-2017, 10:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
|
|
I watched that revolver for days and didn't call the guy. I didn't want to drive to Tucson. Congrats - nice one.
__________________
Jeb
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 10:54 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlay
Beautiful, if I want a gun, wife just says buy it, she never questions my purchases of guns.
|
Speaking personally, my wife can't question what she doesn't know about ...
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 11:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
It wasn't because I bought the gun it was that I didn't ask to take money out of our savings. We are trying to save for a house. It was just too hard to turn down. We do have an agreement if I buy a gun she gets a piece of jewelry. Haha Thanks for all the support and compliments. Decisions decisions! I'm thinking of getting a letter for this one. What do you all think?
Last edited by Nighthawk0083; 07-11-2017 at 11:43 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-11-2017, 11:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nachogrande
You didn't mention what you paid. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have that in my gun safe, BUT "pristine & perfect" are words I don't throw around lightly. " IF IT DIDN'T HAVE'S" don't count. IF the Queen did have, she'd be King. There should be a sticky for rat holling $ for guns.
|
I changed it to "very nice." I dont want to be misleading.
|
07-11-2017, 11:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Liked 34 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
I did almost the same thing last week!
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 12:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Oh yeah I saw yours last week! Thats a nice one! Model 25's for everyone!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 01:04 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 161
Likes: 373
Liked 64 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
Did you remove the stocks? I have S159746 and it has a "W" main spring. Mine shipped 1-'56.
Larry
|
07-12-2017, 01:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 99
Likes: 177
Liked 56 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Love those classic lines man.
__________________
Smith..and Wesson..and myself.
|
07-12-2017, 01:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albiek22
Did you remove the stocks? I have S159746 and it has a "W" main spring. Mine shipped 1-'56.
Larry
|
I will have to check. What is a W main spring?
|
07-12-2017, 01:32 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 161
Likes: 373
Liked 64 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
The main spring is in the shape of a "W", they also had a "U" shaped one on some 1955 .45 cal. revolvers. The "W" and the "U" were not common, as they tried for a lighter double action pull. It could have a standard main spring.
Larry
|
07-12-2017, 06:52 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fincastle, VA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,879
Liked 6,283 Times in 910 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc44
I doubt a 1955 45 Target would sit in inventory for three years (in the case of the January 1958 gun). Most likely it was made within a "reasonable" time before it was shipped. Since S&W shared frames and the serial number sequence between N-frame models, it is not surprising a group of guns with lower serial numbers was made and shipped long after expected. Same is true for the 44 Magnum.
How this happens may be a good topic to be presented at the next symposium of the S&WCA.
Bill
|
I think we all would like to know more about the method of allocation S&W used for serial numbers. Intuitively we think guns are manufactured in serial number sequence. Evidently that's not the case with S&W, especially since serial number blocks were allocated among different models of revolvers.
It was with that thought that I included data on my pre-24.
Rather than save this topic for a symposium presentation it would be quite a benefit to present the information here on the forums. Unfortunately there are many of us who are members of the SWCA but have difficulty attending the annual symposium.
Curl
|
07-12-2017, 07:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Great State of AZ
Posts: 253
Likes: 288
Liked 355 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
"W" Mainspring on a Pre-25...
Serial number on this one is S1436XX and I have been told it dates to 1955
Last edited by SparkyAZ; 07-12-2017 at 07:54 AM.
Reason: Added serial number
|
07-12-2017, 08:07 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 3,711
Liked 8,951 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Let me give you another data point. My 1955 Target bears s/n S144516 which is 23 units ahead of your beauty. The records show that mine shipped in January 1958.
|
And mine is S159461 and shipped in February of 1958, almost 15,000 numbers higher, so go figure.
Quote:
I think we all would like to know more about the method of allocation S&W used for serial numbers. Intuitively we think guns are manufactured in serial number sequence. Evidently that's not the case with S&W, especially since serial number blocks were allocated among different models of revolvers.
|
S&W did manufacture guns in serial number sequence however, we never know exactly how many are in any given block of numbers because it would have been based on need or demand for a given model. They could make as few as 50 or as many as 5,000. Add to that the fact that they deliberately jumped around within serial number blocks just to keep the competition guessing and the whole thing gets confusing. Also you must remember that the dates that Roy Jinks and the many books that have copied his information are based on use shipping dates and not date of manufacture.
Add to that the fact that guns were stored in a cage awaiting shipment and the shipping folks cared not what serial number gun that they were grabbing to fill an order. As long as the serial number was recorded in the outgoing shipping log, inventory was controlled. It is only we collectors that need to have precise dates for each model and expect that guns went out in some sequential order. NOT THE CASE.
We see numerous times where a lower serial numbered gun has shipped out days, months or even years after a higher number.
As mentioned, you also have different models using close serial number blocks. My S159461 1955 .45 target is only 2 digits higher than say S159459 which could have been the last number used in a group of .44 magnums????
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 08:55 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,539 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
Frames were made and serial numbered in sequence, but finished revolvers using these frames were not completed in sequence. A low numbered frame may have been used long after a higher numbered frame in the manufacture of a revolver. For example, 44 Magnum, S166065, was manufactured on March 29, 1956 and shipped on April 2, 1956, whereas, 44 Magnum, S153810, was manufactured on November 5, 1956 and shipped on November 8, 1956.
Bill
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 09:48 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,804
Likes: 18,554
Liked 22,424 Times in 8,277 Posts
|
|
Bill: Can we attribute this to the distribution within the factory of the frames? Were some put in the cycle for a particular model and others for different models, or are they dumped into a holding site and withdrawn as needed by the days manufacturing? (If they stirred up the pot at times and mixed all the numbers up).
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
07-12-2017, 10:10 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc44
Frames were made and serial numbered in sequence, but finished revolvers using these frames were not completed in sequence. A low numbered frame may have been used long after a higher numbered frame in the manufacture of a revolver. For example, 44 Magnum, S166065, was manufactured on March 29, 1956 and shipped on April 2, 1956, whereas, 44 Magnum, S153810, was manufactured on November 5, 1956 and shipped on November 8, 1956.
Bill
|
With that SN process, is it safe to assume some serial numbers never left the factory - some frames being damaged down the assembly, fitting and finishing stages? Has anyone ever put forth a guess as to what percentage of frames were rejected? I would think the earliest frames may have taken a heavier toll due to the extensive hand work required. Thanks.
__________________
Jeb
|
07-12-2017, 10:40 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
For the most part the upper side plate screw was eliminated in 1956. While it may have shipped anytime during 1955 or after, it was likely manufactured in 1955 or thereabout.
It's a sweetie. You won't have any trouble selling it.
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
|
07-12-2017, 10:52 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,631
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
To add another complication, what is the date of "manufacture?" The date the frame was stamped or the date the final assembled gun was placed into its shipping box? There could be a very long time between those two events. I think BATFE would say the former, as it considers a serial numbered frame to be "The Gun."
|
07-12-2017, 11:18 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,539 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
The only model I know of with a serial number range set aside is the Combat Magnum. K260001-K265000 was set aside for the first five thousand of this model.
Bill
|
07-12-2017, 11:25 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Death Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 14,040
Liked 9,011 Times in 1,404 Posts
|
|
Why would anyone tell their wife they bought a gun?
__________________
Living a dream - S&WCA #2364
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 06:02 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 3,711
Liked 8,951 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
As DWalt stated, the BATFE considers it to be a firearm once the serial number is applied to the frame. If, as someone asked, a frame was damaged during the assembly process, it could not be scraped without reporting its disposition to the BATFE.
As is evidenced by the production of the .22/32 HFT's, wherein each completed gun received a numbered pair of two screw extension target stocks in order of the guns completion, there is no correlation between the sequence of serial numbers and the sequence of stock numbers.
This is not to be confused with the serial number applied to the inside of the right stock panel but an assembly order number stamped on the bottom of the left stock panel. This was done for about the first 3,000 guns assembled and really shows one the randomness.
You must realize that groups of frames were handed out to the various workers and assembled in no serial number sequence and some workers may have worked faster than others. This creates a very random pattern of gun serial numbers and then the completed guns went into the vault in preparation for shipment.
As an order was filled, a shipping clerk would go to the section were the needed model was stored and grab 10 guns. No care was taken to grab 10 sequentially numbered guns as they were merely filling an order with inventory. The serial numbers were recorded as they went out and it is these records that are used to obtain shipping dates or information contained in history letters.
All of these factors tend to add to the randomness of dates and serial numbers and drive us collectors, who want things all neat and orderly, crazy.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Last edited by JSR III; 07-12-2017 at 06:04 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-12-2017, 06:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: SETX - 77651
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SparkyAZ
"W" Mainspring on a Pre-25...
Serial number on this one is S1436XX and I have been told it dates to 1955
|
I've got S143450, it has the standard spring. Wonder what decided which spring went in what gun?
Russ
|
07-12-2017, 08:04 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,539 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
Some of the earliest 1955 45 Target revolvers have a serial number in the S143000 range.
Bill
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-13-2017, 02:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 40
Liked 252 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Well I checked it has a standard main spring.
|
07-13-2017, 04:01 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
My .45 HE Target Model of 1955 #S 130961 was shipped in Jan 1959 according to Mr Jinks. You really can't tell a lot by serial numbers
|
07-13-2017, 04:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
My serial # is S130745 that should for be a first run pre 29 but it's a 5 screw Pre 25.The serial matches on all the parts as does the assembly # in the yoke and inside the sideplate.
Don't know when it shipped but I haven't seen or heard of a lower number on a Pre 25
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
|
07-13-2017, 05:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,631
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oger
My .45 HE Target Model of 1955 #S 130961 was shipped in Jan 1959 according to Mr Jinks. You really can't tell a lot by serial numbers
|
That one seems very late. Those on my list having relatively nearby SNs all shipped around late 1955 to early 1956, but most are .44 Magnums.
|
07-13-2017, 10:55 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 282
Likes: 20
Liked 158 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
It's on the ship date list of 3-27-17. The reason I bought the weapon was because of the very early serial number according to the book 143XXX was the starting date for pre 25 1955 targets. It appears that there are a few more in the 130,000 range so it may have been more common than everyone thought.
|
07-14-2017, 07:24 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 3,711
Liked 8,951 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
You must also realize that the shipping date books are hand written and sometimes very difficult to read. They were done by humans and humans are prone to making mistakes. S&W serial numbers are sometimes hard to read and it is always possible that numbers were recorded wrong.
The serial number charts in the printed books were all taken from research done by the S&W Historian, Roy Jinks. These are not computer records and are therefore not easily searched or tabulated. The serial number charts are merely an interpretation of those records and since S&W purposely skipped around within the groups of numbers available, groups of serial numbers can be missed. This is why you sometimes will find a gun with a number that seems to be outside of the reported range. It is not a fluke, it is merely from a group of guns not previously listed for that model.
Quote:
My .45 HE Target Model of 1955 #S 130961 was shipped in Jan 1959 according to Mr Jinks. You really can't tell a lot by serial numbers
|
The other component that you must consider with serial numbers is that guns were sometimes loaned out to gun magazine writers or ammunition companies or sales people. These guns were not listed at that time in the shipping records because they were not sold and therefore did not represent income to the company. When those guns were returned, it could be days, weeks, months or even years before they found they way back to the vault and eventually shipped. This is why occasionally you will find a gun that according to the next lowest and higher serial numbers shipped should have shipped say in 1953 but is listed in the shipping record as 1959.
Guns that never found there way back to the company for shipment will often show up as OPEN on the records.
I have worked in the shipping record books at Roy Jink's office and believe me, some of the writing requires a magnifying glass to decipher and it's a wonder that Roy has not gone blind after all of these years pouring through those records.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
07-14-2017, 07:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Liked 466 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-14-2017, 07:54 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 923
Liked 9,964 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
These incessant guessing games about when made/shipped, and the accompanying reasoning/arguments about the whys and wherefores cause premature aging----and hair loss.
To add fuel to the fire, my Model of 1955 #S160970 shipped January 16, 1959---and was delivered to the Williams Gun Sight Co.. I know this the only way anybody (besides Roy and Don) knows this---and push come to shove, I don't even care when it was made----or shipped---knowing full well both events came to pass. I also know guns can sit in inventory for a loooooooooooooooong time before shipping. I used to think/wonder about this, but it made my teeth hurt.
Ralph Tremaine
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|