Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:47 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default S&W Heavy Duty

Hello! I just got this gun in a trade and was wanting to know more about it. The Serial is S 731## and has a star between the letter and numbers. It is in pretty good shape but has holster wear and Franzite stag grips. What year was it made and an estimated value would hopefully make me happy.

Thank you!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3602.jpg (95.6 KB, 258 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3601.jpg (111.9 KB, 192 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:06 PM
robertrwalsh robertrwalsh is online now
SWCA Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 1,234
Liked 6,036 Times in 2,149 Posts
Default

Looks like 1949 or 1950 far as I can tell WAG on value is roughly $900 plus but that is VERY rough indeed. I am sure somebody with more knowledge than I will jump in with a better number.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 07-12-2017, 11:01 PM
Tadeus67's Avatar
Tadeus67 Tadeus67 is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mexico
Posts: 378
Likes: 4,063
Liked 508 Times in 196 Posts
Default

The front sight looks modified
__________________
"lets be careful out there"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 07-12-2017, 11:04 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default More pics

Here are a couple more pics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3603.jpg (43.7 KB, 133 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3605.jpg (45.2 KB, 153 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 07-12-2017, 11:08 PM
80sgyrene 80sgyrene is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 447
Likes: 15
Liked 660 Times in 188 Posts
Default

Definitely modified. I think $900 is optimistic. I would think $6-700. I'm far from an expert tho.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2017, 11:15 PM
05CarbonDRZ 05CarbonDRZ is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cottage Grove,WI
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 1,540
Liked 5,518 Times in 1,650 Posts
Default

Front sight has been swapped to a rifle type ramp sight,This was a common mod back in the Day.The Star* means it's been back to the Factory for Work.Remove the Stocks and look on the Left Grip frame for any refinish marks R-B or 3 digit date codes 3.68 for March(3) of 1968(68) for example.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 07-13-2017, 08:15 AM
SAFireman's Avatar
SAFireman SAFireman is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Home of the Alamo
Posts: 5,837
Likes: 16,524
Liked 15,553 Times in 3,100 Posts
Default

Did anyone else notice that it is missing "Made in USA" or a 4 line address on the right side of the frame? I would say it 'should' have a 4 line address by that serial number, but it still has the pre-war long action, so maybe a one liner?
__________________
On the Oak Savannah
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 07-13-2017, 09:02 AM
old bear's Avatar
old bear old bear is offline
US Veteran
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,715
Likes: 29,581
Liked 23,016 Times in 5,788 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAFireman View Post
Did anyone else notice that it is missing "Made in USA" or a 4 line address on the right side of the frame? I would say it 'should' have a 4 line address by that serial number, but it still has the pre-war long action, so maybe a one liner?
Is anyone else not seeing the screw that should be located at the front of the trigger guard?
I also have some concerns with the location of the "star," if it is really between the S prefix and any numbers, that does not sound like something the factory would do. This leads me to believe the serial number has been modified.
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-13-2017, 09:33 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,595
Likes: 239
Liked 29,105 Times in 14,073 Posts
Default

The SN suggests a mid-1949 shipment. It is odd that the 4-line stamping is missing and appears to have never been there. The front sight is not original. As a shooter, virtually any HD will be worth at least $500. I'd think this one might go for $600-$700. You might check to see if the chambers have been lengthened to accept .357 cartridges.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 07-13-2017, 05:16 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default

When I get home i will look at frame and take pictures of it and the serial number. It does have a screw on front of trigger guard.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-13-2017, 07:28 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default More pics

More pics of the Heavy Duty.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3612.jpg (44.0 KB, 109 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3613.jpg (43.4 KB, 117 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3618.jpg (35.1 KB, 104 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3622.jpg (39.5 KB, 103 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3624.jpg (49.5 KB, 106 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 07-13-2017, 07:56 PM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,521
Likes: 89,645
Liked 24,868 Times in 8,516 Posts
Default

Welcome to the Forum.

There may not been room on the butt to place the star after the SN.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-13-2017, 07:59 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,595
Likes: 239
Liked 29,105 Times in 14,073 Posts
Default

Definitely returned to the factory once. No indication whatsoever that the 4-line address was ever stamped. We know that S&W once had a policy of applying 4-line stamps to guns returned for service that did not have them. Apparently not this one. I'd still like to know the full story behind S&W's stamping practice for serviced guns.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-13-2017, 08:05 PM
old bear's Avatar
old bear old bear is offline
US Veteran
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,715
Likes: 29,581
Liked 23,016 Times in 5,788 Posts
Default

Looking a photo #2, it appears as if a lanyard ring attachment point had been filled in. I had a 38/44 that also had the lanyard ring attachment point filled in, but the serial number was re stamped on the grip frame. From the markings it appears as if yours had a trip back to the factory in November 1951.
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 07-13-2017, 11:40 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

I be curious to hear what the barrel actually measures, from the front of the cylinder to the muzzle? I wonder if it might have been cut down, hence the rifle ramp front sight.

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-13-2017, 11:42 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave T View Post
I be curious to hear what the barrel actually measures, from the front of the cylinder to the muzzle? I wonder if it might have been cut down, hence the rifle ramp front sight.

Dave
I will measure it in the morning but looking online I saw a few that have the same sight.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-14-2017, 06:51 AM
beagleye's Avatar
beagleye beagleye is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 4,040
Liked 2,537 Times in 734 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HueyBryan View Post
I will measure it in the morning but looking online I saw a few that have the same sight.
I have seen that modification a few times too, but it's not original.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 07-14-2017, 07:30 AM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,870
Likes: 976
Liked 18,987 Times in 9,290 Posts
Default

Cool gun, and a relatively late one to have the rework star stamped on it.

Given the lack of the right forward frame stamping, the work in 11/51 may have been a refinish. No explanation for why the address wasn't redone if so, however.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-14-2017, 10:15 PM
Tadeus67's Avatar
Tadeus67 Tadeus67 is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mexico
Posts: 378
Likes: 4,063
Liked 508 Times in 196 Posts
Default

I think it should have the one line stamp. Mine is of the same period. The craftsmanship of the lockwork in this revolvers is amazing. Enjoy your "new" revolver it is special in every way you look at it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20170714_155734609.jpg (52.7 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_20170714_155753413.jpg (34.8 KB, 23 views)
__________________
"lets be careful out there"
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 07-15-2017, 05:51 PM
HueyBryan HueyBryan is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default Measurement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave T View Post
I be curious to hear what the barrel actually measures, from the front of the cylinder to the muzzle? I wonder if it might have been cut down, hence the rifle ramp front sight.

Dave
Here is the measurement.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3630.jpg (151.1 KB, 38 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 07-15-2017, 07:25 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,791
Likes: 18,498
Liked 22,388 Times in 8,267 Posts
Default

I'm wondering if the return to the factory might not have been for cutting a 6" barrel down to 4", and sight relocated? The missing "Made in U.S.A." stamp mystifies me.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-15-2017, 07:31 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

Probably the camera angle but it doesn't look like the tape is completely up against the cylinder, like the actual measurement might be a bit over 4". Which, given the none S&W front sight would be another indication it was cut down.

H Richard, do you think the factory would have put a rifle ramp on the barrel after cutting it from 6" to ~4"? Doesn't seem likely. More likely is that a gunsmith some where cut the barrel and put that sight on at the then owners request. In other words, he had it done locally.

All speculation on my part of course. It's still a neat ol' Heavy Duty.

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)

Last edited by Dave T; 07-15-2017 at 07:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-15-2017, 08:19 PM
Peak53's Avatar
Peak53 Peak53 is offline
Member
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 6,282
Liked 7,472 Times in 2,287 Posts
Default

Could it have been refinished/reworked more than once? The address line may have been polished off outside the factory.
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-15-2017, 08:22 PM
Lee's Landing Billy Lee's Landing Billy is offline
Banned
S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty S&W Heavy Duty  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Battery Oaks Range, S.C.
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 5,663
Liked 3,574 Times in 1,163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by old bear View Post
Looking a photo #2, it appears as if a lanyard ring attachment point had been filled in. I had a 38/44 that also had the lanyard ring attachment point filled in, but the serial number was re stamped on the grip frame. From the markings it appears as if yours had a trip back to the factory in November 1951.
Looks kinda familiar don't it ole Pard? I liked your barrel length better, but this is another nice old gun. I don't know what you paid but I'd be in for $600.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
38-44 Heavy Duty Identity (photo heavy) Mike99 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 32 02-17-2021 12:15 AM
S&W 38-44 Heavy Duty DeluxeFordor S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 08-27-2014 08:30 PM
FINALLY, I found a Heavy Duty!!! (picture heavy duty) calmex S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 51 07-26-2014 12:27 PM
WTS 38/44 Heavy Duty... **SPF** Nedroe GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 07-31-2012 05:43 AM
What Heavy Duty? laney566 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 11-08-2010 10:55 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)