|
|
07-20-2017, 02:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 979 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Pre-27 Questions
I just bought a 5-screw, Pre-27 Model .357 Magnum with a 3-1/2" barrel, I don't think the stocks are original. I knew from the beginning that this was more of a shooter and that's more-or-less what I wanted. It came in today and I noted that part of the blue finish has been eaten away on the side-plate up by the large screw, on the recoil shield and on about 1/3 of the back-part of the cylinder...as if the gun had been set down in something on the right side. The serial number is S 151481. My two questions are...about when was it made? And, what is the expert's opinion on having it re-blued?
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 02:38 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
Congrats on what appears to be a nice shooter.
I'm showing 1956-57 manufacture. I don't notice any pitting so a nice blue from Fords, etc. would make it pop but if me, I'd try a touch up with some good cold blue and carry/use it as is.
ETA:
I'm not an expert... just my opinion.
And youre correct in that those stocks are factory but not original to that gun.
Last edited by jack the toad; 07-20-2017 at 02:42 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 04:50 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,400
Likes: 1,322
Liked 30,433 Times in 4,368 Posts
|
|
Most likely shipped in 1956. I would send the ".357" Magnum to Ford's Custom Refinishing in Florida. They will do an outstanding job for you. You need to find a pair of diamond Magna stocks for your Magnum.
Bill
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 05:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 4,213
Liked 2,791 Times in 895 Posts
|
|
Ebay usually has those mid-50's S&W diamond magna stocks
from time to time.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 05:04 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 2,858
Liked 5,194 Times in 722 Posts
|
|
I like it as is!
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 05:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
|
|
I'm with Jack. You bought it as a shooter. Do a nice job of cold bluing...and shoot it!
YMMV,
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 05:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 3,598
Liked 2,001 Times in 534 Posts
|
|
I'm far from an expert, but I'd be happy to give my opinion.
I think you have a great gun for your intent as a shooter. And I'd not do a thing to it except clean well and lube it lightly.
Congrats on your acquisition.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 05:53 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,412
Likes: 27,876
Liked 45,715 Times in 4,812 Posts
|
|
My first choice as an engraved revolver fan is assuming that there is no pitting - take that revolver and send it to your favorite engraver and turn him loose - wait a year or so for him to perform his engraving magic... AND then have it refinished.
My second choice (and maybe my first choice knowing that you bought this as a shooter) is do as Bill recommended and send it to Ford's.
Third choice - if it does not bother you that much and you are going to pack it in a holster and shoot the heck out of it - then leave it as is and smile each time you pull the trigger.
I only recommend refinishing when there has been abuse or neglect - which is apparent in this case. I do not recommend it when there is just good honest wear.
Regardless of what you decide - take a bunch of before photos so that you can share the "before and after" images with the rest of us.
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan
Last edited by RKmesa; 07-21-2017 at 12:17 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 06:37 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 1,560
Liked 2,771 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
Here's a couple that I sent to Fords. A pre-17 and a pre-27. Refinishing it will still make it a shooter, but one you can be proud of .
__________________
Vietnam 1969-1971
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 09:28 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 979 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Pre-27 Questions
Hi everyone and thanks for the comments, information and opinions. I saw on page 135 in the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson (3rd Edition) that the upper side-plate screw was deleted at #S172000 in 1956, so it looks like perhaps 1955-56 for my gun depending on when this was done in 56. I may do some touch-up cold bluing and just have fun with it. The bore and chambers are perfect, the action right on time and the lock-up tight as a drum. I put on a T-grip adapter and have a pancake style holster coming from Simply Rugged Holsters.
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
Last edited by LaVistaBill; 07-20-2017 at 09:29 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 09:35 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,678
Liked 24,874 Times in 8,518 Posts
|
|
Iffn' you get tired of it, contact me. I'm wanting a shooter like that.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 09:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
I'm just glad that gun is back in the hands of someone who appreciates, and knows, what it is. That's a great rescue.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 12:24 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 979 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Pre-27 Shooter
Here's some shooting I did with this Pre-27 the other day. The bulls-eye target was done at 10 yards using .38 wadcutters and the International silhouette was done at 7 yards DA with a mix of .38 WC and .357 Magnum JHP ammo.
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 02:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,598
Likes: 240
Liked 29,108 Times in 14,073 Posts
|
|
Regarding dating S151481,
S150,000 – S175,999……Late 1956 – Early 1957 (Manufacture)
N-frame shipping dates often do not track too closely with SN, but 1957 shipment is likely. Closest SN I list is S1502xx shipping in 2/57.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 02:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 979 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Pre-27 Questions
Dwalt, I know you are an acknowledged expert, so I appreciate this information. Is the Standard Catalog of S&W 3rd Edition accurate when they say the big frame screw was dropped in 1956? Mine has that big screw...of course I also know that S&W never wasted a part, so it could still be an old frame that made it onto a gun built in 1957...???
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 02:32 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,318
Likes: 26,822
Liked 19,400 Times in 4,088 Posts
|
|
" I noted that part of the blue finish has been eaten away on the side-plate up by the large screw, on the recoil shield and on about 1/3 of the back-part of the cylinder...as if the gun had been set down in something on the right side."
If I had to guess it was blood. Shoot as is or send to Ford's..
__________________
SWCA #2306
DAV in honor of POP
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 02:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,598
Likes: 240
Liked 29,108 Times in 14,073 Posts
|
|
"... so it could still be an old frame that made it onto a gun built in 1957...??? "
About all I know is that is been stated that N-frames lost their upper sideplate screws sometime in 1956 as the result of a 1955 manufacturing change order. I have no way of knowing the exact date range or SN as to when that happened as my data is not precise enough to establish the changeover from five screws to four screws. Could an older frame in inventory have been used to assemble a gun later? Sure it could. There are cases of shipping dates being much later than would be expected from serial numbers, and that is one possible reason. Frame manufacture dates, assembly dates, and shipping dates are three somewhat independent events, except for their ordering.
Last edited by DWalt; 07-24-2017 at 02:49 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 02:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toboso Ohio
Posts: 44
Likes: 52
Liked 60 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Keep it cleaned and oiled and shoot it as often as you can, enjoy it.
__________________
Buckeye Fan
Wheel Guns Rock
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 03:20 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,400
Likes: 1,322
Liked 30,433 Times in 4,368 Posts
|
|
Engineering Change Request #486 to delete the upper side plate screw and add a tongue to the side plate on all N and NT side plates was issued on September 7, 1956. For the 44 Magnum, the first 4-screw revolvers were shipped in February 1957, so it took about five months to implement the change for this model. The change request for K-frame revolvers was issued in 1955 and the Combat Magnum, a new model, was first manufactured with a 4-screw frame. Since many K frame side plates were in inventory, I don't know how long it took to implement this change for the other models.
Bill
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 03:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,412
Likes: 2,858
Liked 3,329 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
|
If I remember correctly, the order for the upper sideplate screw was issued in September 56 and the order for model numbers to begin in June 57. Theoretically, there is about a 9 or 10 month window there. But, there is a changeover process where old parts were used up as guns were built. From threads read here, it appears that it took several months before 5 screw frames were used up, and model stamping did not begin immediately either. I have a 4 screw .44 Magnum, non model marked, that shipped in 1958.
One item that may have affected shipping dates for the .357 Magnum, or Model 27 stamped guns, was the introduction of the Combat Magnum, later the Model 19. It would have been normal for police to be wanting the lighter gun for carry, slowing the N frame magnum shipping.
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 05:29 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Battery Oaks Range, S.C.
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 5,663
Liked 3,574 Times in 1,163 Posts
|
|
Get yourself a really nice pair of stocks/grips that you like and that will go a long way towards making it "yours". Finish it off with a well used Old Name floral carved holster and start carrying that beauty.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 05:57 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,863
Likes: 11,830
Liked 13,811 Times in 3,357 Posts
|
|
It looks like a nice pre 27 to me. No matter who reblues it, and how good they do, it will always look like a reblued gun.
It can only be original once. To make it like period bluing you would need the charcoal bluing which very few people do any more. If you must refinish it, I would suggest nickel.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 07:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,593
Likes: 3,710
Liked 8,947 Times in 3,555 Posts
|
|
My pre 27 is S 159084 and shipped in September of 1956. My 1955 .45 Target is S 159461 and shipped in February of 1958 my model 27 is S 198705 and shipped in November of 1959. So as you can see, serial numbers and dates can be all over the board.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 08:13 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,412
Likes: 27,876
Liked 45,715 Times in 4,812 Posts
|
|
To highlight the interesting timing related to the shipping of the 357 Magnum, I have three different engineering changes that shipped in 1959:
5-Screw Pre-27 - Shipped April 1959
4-Screw Pre-27 (No Model Mark) - Shipped July 1959
4-Screw Model Marked 27 - Shipped October 1959
The other interesting thing on the above guns is that they all shipped to the same store - J. S. Oshman Co in Houston, TX. Of course the engraving could have had some impact on the timing...
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 10:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'Beachy' SoCal
Posts: 522
Likes: 12
Liked 761 Times in 280 Posts
|
|
My gun acquisition/ownership philosophy over 50 years of collecting...
'Almost' without exception, economics in mind. Never buying with concerning for resale per se. Yet very, very rarely purchasing without some 'investment' consideration. A number of my guns in the 'nice old gun' category. Many of my 'collectibles' becoming so simply by duration in my hands; happily 'ripening', though not particularly intentional!
I can appreciate a gun for what it is. In my estimation, not often to take a candidate piece, do a quality refinish and come out ahead from an investment standpoint. While to appreciate a such refinish, often 'qualified', considering the economics resulting. (Aside: Rendering a gun an 'objet d'art', quite another entire culture & realm, not subject to 'pedestrian economic rules'.)
Otherwise...
Just my take
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 02:33 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
I agree with ditrina above. The missing blue looks to me like a blood stain, and one that was wiped off pretty quickly. Blood is an amazing blue remover, as efficient or better than Naval Jelly!
A typical scenario is a cut from the hammer spur under recoil in the top of the right thumb (for a right hand shooter). The gun is put down, the flow of blood is squelched, and then attn. is turned to the gun to wipe off the blood. But it's already too late; the blue is gone. Any longer and pitting results.
A few above have recommended Ford's Refinishing in Florida.
I'm not here to bash Ford's Refinishing. But since the old man retired a couple of years ago, some extremely poor testimonials relating bad experiences have come forward on several forums.
Their work was exceptional and many fine examples are found on this forum from the past. So all I'm suggesting is 'cuidado", use caution. Do some careful homework before sending your gun.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 07-27-2017 at 10:46 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 06:14 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
Jim, was not aware of that regarding Fords. Thanks for sharing.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-27-2017, 09:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 979 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Charles (Toad), Jim (Hondo) and all the rest. Thanks for your information and insights. I checked with Fords and T&D Metal Works, they all want around $400 for a quality polish and blue. I bought this gun for a shooter, so I've decided to keep it as is. I had a blood-stained Terrier .38 that S&W refinished for me back years ago, so I'm sure that is what it is. It shoots good, so I'm just gonna enjoty it.
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-27-2017, 10:23 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 451
Likes: 23
Liked 263 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
It is with some trepidation that I offer caution about Ford's work these days. There are several threads on the Colt Forum that document terrible work by Fords. I personally would not send anything to Ford's after seeing pictures of Colt Forum member's guns butchered by Ford's. Some of the worst examples do not have a sharp edge remaining on them, and the "restoration" of markings was done with a pin punch machine!
If anyone wants to search for the pictures on the Colt Forum, the Colt Forum member with the user name of "Rick Bowles" posted pictures of the latest Ford's butcher job. A search for "Ford's" will probably turn up other threads documenting poor Ford's work.
I recall a relatively recent post here on this Forum that showed a couple of Smith & Wesson revolvers that looked very "soft" after being refinished by Ford's, with "pulled" screw holes as well.
At one time, Ford's did decent (but not up to Turnbull standards) work, but apparently not now.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2017, 07:38 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Battery Oaks Range, S.C.
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 5,663
Liked 3,574 Times in 1,163 Posts
|
|
I have a Triplelock, a 2nd model 44, and a Colt Diamondback at Ford's right now. We should have a definitive answer in the next 4 or 5 weeks.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|