|
|
09-14-2017, 10:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Victory Revolver
I have a Victory revolver, Ser # V69XXX, I understand most were sent back to the factory to have a hammer block installed. There was another letter added to indicate the block had been installed. This one does not have that additional letter. Looking to find out when it was manufactured/shipped and an estimate of the value.
|
09-14-2017, 10:38 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meritbg7
I understand most were sent back to the factory to have a hammer block installed
|
Not "most." Some, and the number doesn't seem to be high, relative to the total number manufactured.
Quote:
Ser # V69XXX
find out when it was manufactured/shipped
|
This one was made in 1942, May or later (the V prefix started on April 24, 1942). Production of the revolvers with the improved hammer block safety (sliding block) began in December, 1944, and shipments started in January, 1945. The retrofits happened in 1945, but as mentioned above, there weren't that many of them.
Quote:
There was another letter added to indicate the block had been installed
|
Yes, an S. New production with the improved hammer block got the SV prefix. An S was also added to the rear portion of the sideplate to indicate the sideplate had the extra machine work to accommodate the new safety mechanism. Retrofits also had that S.
The SV shows up as early as SV732261 (lowest one I've located). By somewhere in the SV76xxxx range, it was virtually universal. I do show one in the V765xxx range that lacks the S, but I show numbers on either side of that with the SV.
Hope this helps.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
09-14-2017, 10:54 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
|
|
Here is an example of the "S"on the rear portion of the sideplate.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-14-2017, 10:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
|
|
The closest SN I have listed to yours is V673xx which shipped in 3/42. You did not state whether yours was chambered in .38 S&W (the British version) or .38 S&W Special. It is impossible to even make a guess as to value without considerably more information and some pictures. Relatively few of the earlier (pre-1945) revolvers were converted by retrofitting the 1945 hammer blocking drop safety improvement. It was just too expensive and difficult to perform on all existing guns just to achieve a rather minor benefit (all Victories already had a hammer drop safety). Having an S stamp on the sideplate does not necessarily mean that a gun was converted. S&W used that stamping for awhile as a simple method to easily distinguish between old sideplates and newer ones as they are not interchangeable.
Last edited by DWalt; 09-14-2017 at 11:15 AM.
|
09-14-2017, 11:14 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
I seem to remember there were about 40.000 guns in that 1945 Navy refurbishment contract that included adding the hammer block, and that was it. No other guns were retrofitted; in fact, the factory seems to have shipped guns from inventory without the hammer block for several months after new production got it installed. I have one shipped in June 1945 without.
As DWalt says, without pictures your Victory could, value-wise, be anything from a cut-down $150 shooter to a $600 pristine unissued specimen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The closest SN I have listed to yours is V673xx which shipped in 3/42.....
|
DWalt:
Are you sure about March? Seems too early for any V prefix.
Last edited by Absalom; 09-14-2017 at 11:18 AM.
|
09-14-2017, 11:32 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
DWalt:
Are you sure about March? Seems too early for any V prefix.
|
Yes. March does not seem probable. All the information we have points to April 24th as the date on which the V prefix was begun. A gun bearing the V prefix and five digits could not have shipped a month before V1 was assembled. I could believe 5/42, given the factory's rate of production at that time, but 3/42 stretches the imagination to a breaking point.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
09-14-2017, 12:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
Yes. March does not seem probable. All the information we have points to April 24th as the date on which the V prefix was begun. A gun bearing the V prefix and five digits could not have shipped a month before V1 was assembled. I could believe 5/42, given the factory's rate of production at that time, but 3/42 stretches the imagination to a breaking point.
|
My mistake, it's 8/42. I think I hit the wrong key.
|
09-14-2017, 01:07 PM
|
Absent Comrade US Veteran SWCA Founding Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
Minor point: V1 through V5 and serial number 1,000,000. were assembled by the Service Dep't, in high polish brilliant blue, with fancy grained stocks, by special order of Carl Hellstrom, to be used as presentation guns for VIPs ( V1 went to Lt. Gen. Wm. Knudsen, who returned it after WW2 and it was rebuilt to add the "S" modification and presented to Pres. Harry Truman in 1947. ) Assembly line production of Victory models V6 and continuing, started in the April 1942 time frame , so they actually were produced before V1 to V5. V-16, formerly in my collection, was shipped June 16, 1942 as part of the first shipment if V series guns. V3 is in the NRA Museum, 1,000,000 and V5 are in the Springfield History Museum with the S&W factory collection. Ed.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-14-2017, 02:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The closest SN I have listed to yours is V673xx which shipped in 3/42. You did not state whether yours was chambered in .38 S&W (the British version) or .38 S&W Special. It is impossible to even make a guess as to value without considerably more information and some pictures. Relatively few of the earlier (pre-1945) revolvers were converted by retrofitting the 1945 hammer blocking drop safety improvement. It was just too expensive and difficult to perform on all existing guns just to achieve a rather minor benefit (all Victories already had a hammer drop safety). Having an S stamp on the sideplate does not necessarily mean that a gun was converted. S&W used that stamping for awhile as a simple method to easily distinguish between old sideplates and newer ones as they are not interchangeable.
|
Yes. The sideplate in post #3 above is off of a 1946 "S" prefix M&P. It shipped in Aug 1946.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
09-14-2017, 05:32 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Great info, Ed. Thanks very much for posting that.
I knew about #1 million and V5, but not about V1 through V4. Or if I did know, I had completely forgotten.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
09-14-2017, 08:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,134 Times in 14,087 Posts
|
|
V5 - sent to Maj. William Weingar, Springfield Ordnance District, 5/16/42, and returned 8/43. Why, and where it went after it was sent back I have no idea, except it is now in the Springfield history museum. Regarding Lt. Gen. Wm. Knudsen, he was Director of all wartime defense production. He had formerly been President of General Motors, and was promoted directly to such a high rank because FDR felt he needed the clout of having three stars to get the job done without interference. His importance to the winning of WWII cannot be overstated. The man was a production genius.
Last edited by DWalt; 09-14-2017 at 08:45 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|