Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961
o

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2017, 01:43 AM
JGR_LV JGR_LV is offline
Member
New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 79
Likes: 12
Liked 66 Times in 30 Posts
Default New/Old Friend

My daughter, a field archaeologist, was heading out to a new job that will have her living and hiking some rugged country known for varmints with anywhere from zero to four legs, including some of the two-legged variety. I'd been debating about getting her some sort of new plastic gun small enough for easy carry, but hadn't got it done, so I sent her off with my constant companion of the last four decades, an early Model 60. It's way beyond dependable, doesn't mind getting wet and it fits just about anywhere, particularly in a day pack
Then I started sorting through the safe for another carry gun for myself. I hadn't tried to carry anything other than the 60 concealed in so long that I'd gotten really spoiled. It was summer in Las Vegas and my waistline had expanded a bit since the last time I'd carried anything else. Tried the 1911, but getting it high enough to not show under a shirttail was a pain in the short ribs. Tried the 439; not much better. Tried the trusty deuce-and-a-half, the 2.5" Model 19, but it still wasn't the greatest; looked a bit like my spare tire had a knot on it. I'm also one of those people for whom using an inside-the-waistband holster means that drawing the weapon presents an immediate choice between a one-hand shooting grip or having my pants at half-mast.
In other words, I was suffering J-Frame withdrawal symptoms, big-time. So I checked the LGS and put out the word among current and retired LEO friends that I was looking for a Model 38 or 49 and if anybody had one taking up room in his sock drawer, I'd be glad to take it off his hands. No luck there. I guess that says I just don't have many friends stupid enough to let go of one of those.
So I started cruising the on-line auctions. There are some out there, but the secret seems to be out, and as fast as dummies sell their J-frames to finance a new compact Glock or whatever, smarter people are grabbing these classics. In among the newer, flashier J-frames, though, something caught my eye, a flat-latch pre-Model 36, all original, including the grips with the serial number stamped on the inside, and it was stuck at the $299 starting bid. I put up a bid around $350 and behold, when the time ran out I was the only bidder. The full-frame photos had shown a tired old lady that had spent a long life on the mean streets of New York, with lots of what I'd describe as pocket wear rather than holster wear. The close-ups, though, showed a hammer and trigger with none of the tell-tale rub marks in the case hardening you get from extensive firing, the bore and chambers looked pristine, and altogether it looked like something carried a lot and shot almost never.
It arrived yesterday, and turned out to look better than pictured, with fairly minor bluing loss. The internals were black with congealed oil and grease, but a thorough cleaning and some Action Lube fixed that. If I have any gripe at all, it's that the double-action pull still has some of the stiffness of a new gun. The old-style rounded hammer spur with the fine checkering makes it a better pocket gun than the newer versions and takes care of my one issue with the Model 60, that sharp hammer spur that ate through a lot of coat linings, back in the day. For the cost of a new 642 I now have a veteran that's only going to appreciate with time.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Chief's Special.jpg (70.9 KB, 92 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2017, 04:21 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
Default

That's a beauty! Great price too. Don't know what you mean by "For the cost of a new 642..." It's a lot less than that.

You have an early Model of 1953 New J frame and I'm sure it's a four screw. Very likely below #72195 and from about Feb or March 1956.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2017, 09:05 AM
S&WsRsweet S&WsRsweet is offline
Member
New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend New/Old Friend  
Join Date: May 2017
Location: TTown Alabama ,Roll Tide
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 9,772
Liked 2,220 Times in 1,031 Posts
Default

Oh yes that is way better than any new gun way better .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Truly man's best friend jtcarm The Lounge 4 11-18-2014 08:12 AM
3913 friend to friend sale ????? BAM-BAM Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 31 09-13-2014 02:23 PM
My friend C/O S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 03-17-2011 07:39 PM
My new 19-3. I'm here to help, little friend. large_orange_drink S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 22 06-15-2010 10:43 PM
My Friend, Your Friend: Michael Moore godlessgael The Lounge 13 09-18-2009 12:45 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)