Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2017, 11:53 PM
rbergs rbergs is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 60
Liked 53 Times in 10 Posts
Default 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit

Ladies and Gentleman: I have a question regarding the fit of the grips on my 1934 Outdoorsman. The grips shown in the photos are new to the revolver. They are stamped with a number that is 542 positions greater than the serial number on the gun so they are from the same era. There is an approximate 1/64th of an inch gap between the semi-circular cut out of the frame and the semi-circular protrusion of the grips. I believe I can reduce the gap by filing the shoulders on either side of the semi-circular protrusion but I'm wondering if I should. The gap is common to both sides. The remainder of the grips fit the revolver well. This is my first pre-war revolver so I don't know if this is common or "acceptable." Thoughts?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0031.jpg (99.1 KB, 247 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0032.jpg (88.7 KB, 236 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:14 AM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

This is not too uncommon. 1/64th in. "gap" could be caused just by shrinking of the wood do to age and exposure to the elements. I wouldn't lose any sleep over it myself. You can file the shoulders and that might help close the gap, but that can have ramifications at the bottom of the grip that requires further "adjustment" and before long you have a real problem ! Ed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 10-05-2017, 05:19 AM
austintexas austintexas is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 123
Liked 1,652 Times in 640 Posts
Default

I don't think I would fool with them, They look pretty good and as was said before this isn't uncommon.
SWCA 892
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2017, 08:05 AM
lebomm lebomm is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 38
Liked 821 Times in 490 Posts
Default

If you have a good, light-pressure fit between the shoulders and the alignment pin thru the buttstrap, I'd leave it alone. Trimming the shoulders may result in rattly stocks.

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2017, 09:00 AM
quinn's Avatar
quinn quinn is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 11,149
Liked 12,127 Times in 1,938 Posts
Default

There's a reason that stocks had serial numbers... they were hand fitted to each gun. I tested 3 pairs for fit on a transitional 38 M&P and was shocked at how much difference there was. Only one pair fit acceptably well. I think the fit you have there is pretty durn good!.
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 10-05-2017, 09:16 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,111 Times in 14,074 Posts
Default

On several occasions I have needed to do some fitting on non-original grips, and my tool of choice is a ladies' fingernail emery board. But in those cases, I was unable to make the grips fit without some wood removal. Yours do not seem to have that problem, so I don't believe it is necessary to do anything to yours.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2017, 09:36 AM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,002
Likes: 8,981
Liked 48,747 Times in 9,254 Posts
Default

Leave them alone. The pin won't let them move up even if you file the shoulders, so all you'll be doing is making them loose.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 10-05-2017, 11:36 AM
Keith Brown Keith Brown is offline
Vendor
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Beavercreek,Oh,USA
Posts: 827
Likes: 2
Liked 2,908 Times in 441 Posts
Default

You have a very nice set or factory stocks, I would say please leave them as they are. Removing wood from those small flats is not all that would need to be done, you actually would end up needing to remove wood from the area of the stock circle that is now contacting wood. All of this would have to be done in near perfect symmetry in an amount equal to the existing gap, and Lee is on target, the existing pin hole would have to be filled and then re drilled. Very nice stocks, no one has been in the checkering, getting harder to find such things.
__________________
kbgrips.com
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 10-05-2017, 12:00 PM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,059
Likes: 921
Liked 9,941 Times in 3,656 Posts
Default

Someone once said "The hurrieder I go, the behinder I get."

There was a reason for that.

There still is.

I once had the exact same situation---really spiffy grips on a really spiffy Registered Magnum no less. If you held it up to the light, you could see right through from one side to the other. I fixed it by not holding it up to the light.

Does it hurt when you do that? Don't do that!

Ralph Tremaine

Last edited by rct269; 10-05-2017 at 12:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-05-2017, 12:19 PM
rbergs rbergs is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 60
Liked 53 Times in 10 Posts
Default

To All: Thank you very much. You have alleviated my anxiety. I will leave them alone and enjoy.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2017, 12:39 PM
rburg rburg is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,261 Times in 2,170 Posts
Default

And I hate your signon ID!
__________________
Dick Burg
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 10-05-2017, 12:46 PM
jsfricks's Avatar
jsfricks jsfricks is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3,982
Liked 5,554 Times in 1,154 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rburg View Post
And I hate your signon ID!
Are you and the OP related?
__________________
Get off my lawn!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2017, 01:55 PM
rburg rburg is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,261 Times in 2,170 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsfricks View Post
Are you and the OP related?
Probably not, since we spell it differently.
__________________
Dick Burg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:01 PM
jsfricks's Avatar
jsfricks jsfricks is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3,982
Liked 5,554 Times in 1,154 Posts
Default

Well we know the forum won't allow identical user names.
__________________
Get off my lawn!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:16 PM
Waveski's Avatar
Waveski Waveski is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
Default

Is it possible that a treatment with a good wood oil product , such as teak oil , might swell the walnut ever so slightly and relieve the marginal problem a bit? I can see no down side to that approach.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:20 PM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is online now
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,223
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
Default

Quote:
I can see no down side to that approach.
If you swell the wood, there's a chance the wood will stress crack between the escutcheon and the grip pin. Best to leave it alone.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:33 PM
CQB27's Avatar
CQB27 CQB27 is offline
US Veteran
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lavender Mtn, Georgia
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 4,644
Liked 4,059 Times in 680 Posts
Default

I know nothing of the "how to's" to fix the problem, so I have nothing constructive to add. I just chimed to say those stocks are beautiful!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-05-2017, 03:04 PM
Babysitr Babysitr is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2,264
Liked 2,395 Times in 1,013 Posts
Default

I have a 1934 Outdoorsman that would love to wear those nasty old,poor fitting stocks!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-05-2017, 06:12 PM
Waveski's Avatar
Waveski Waveski is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy View Post
If you swell the wood, there's a chance the wood will stress crack between the escutcheon and the grip pin. Best to leave it alone.
Wiregrass -

I could see that swelling resulting in a crack such as you describe might happen if the grips were immersed in water for a prolonged time , but not if rubbed with teak oil. I have oil rubbed a lot of old grips - a standard practice of mine (if there is not a barrier coat such as varnish...) - no excessive swelling noted. Sure does preserve nicely.

That said , the consensus here is to leave well enough alone , and that is certainly a viable , no risk option.
I know what I would do , but that is moot - not my grips!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 10-05-2017, 08:09 PM
crstrode's Avatar
crstrode crstrode is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Free side of Washington
Posts: 820
Likes: 691
Liked 1,668 Times in 542 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waveski View Post
Wiregrass -

I could see that swelling resulting in a crack such as you describe might happen if the grips were immersed in water for a prolonged time , but not if rubbed with teak oil. I have oil rubbed a lot of old grips - a standard practice of mine (if there is not a barrier coat such as varnish...) - no excessive swelling noted. Sure does preserve nicely.

That said , the consensus here is to leave well enough alone , and that is certainly a viable , no risk option.
I know what I would do , but that is moot - not my grips!
Are those wood things grips, or stocks, or panels or scales or handles or what?

Sent from my ME173X using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-05-2017, 08:42 PM
Waveski's Avatar
Waveski Waveski is offline
Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
Default

??? No idea of the intent of the question.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-05-2017, 09:00 PM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,059
Likes: 921
Liked 9,941 Times in 3,656 Posts
Wink YOU PAYS YOUR MONEY AND YOU TAKES YOUR PICK

Quote:
Originally Posted by crstrode View Post
Are those wood things grips, or stocks, or panels or scales or handles or what?

Sent from my ME173X using Tapatalk
Yes---all of the above.

If your audience knows what you're talking about, you're using the right words---or at least satisfactory words---except maybe for "scales". I knew what you were talking about because "scales" was thrown in with all the rest---otherwise------you'd have stumped me for sure and certain!!

All that said, "handles" is my favorite. I always get a good laugh from "handles".

The real answer continues to elude us. Some/many of us refer to (and defer to) The Historian (Roy Jinks), who has forgotten more than likely any of us knows about S&W lore. I'd suggest referring to his letters for guidance, although he's been known to use the term "stocks" and "grips" in the same letter--sometime in the same paragraph. So either one of those is most certainly acceptable.

Bottom Line (and good for a laugh): Next time the question comes up, just say the stocks are what attach to the grip frame---and then watch your audience's face(s).

Ralph Tremaine
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 10-06-2017, 02:27 AM
rbergs rbergs is offline
SWCA Member
1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit 1934 Outdoorsman Service Grip Fit  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 60
Liked 53 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the additional info. I don't believe I have any family in Kentucky so Dick ("Rburg") and I are probably not related. However, I recently had the pleasure of traveling down the Bourbon Trail and have fallen in Love with the great state. Just jealous...

Dean "Rberg"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1934 Outdoorsman with new old stocks bulldog06 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 5 11-23-2014 11:07 PM
Round J secret service grip and K rd M19 stock grip *Updated* Watts-On Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 2 09-30-2013 06:42 PM
My New K-22 Outdoorsman (April 1934) DCWilson S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 27 11-02-2009 10:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)