|
|
10-13-2017, 01:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 128
Liked 37 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
My S&W .38 S&W (WW 2)
I have no history on this revolver. It was a gift from a good friend that has since passed away. I've had it for at least 40 years. There are British proof marks all over it and the words "NOT English make" are stamped on the barrel and frame. S/N is 817xxx. It is .38 S & W, not .38 Special. Condition is pretty good considering it's age. Some pitting and bluing is thin. I have shot a box of ammo through it since I've had it. Works good. Needs good Cleaning and oiling, then put away. I am proud to have it. Any thoughts? Thanks for looking.
IMG_0282.jpg
IMG_0285.jpg
IMG_0286.jpg
IMG_0281.jpg
IMG_0283.jpg
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-13-2017, 01:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Republik of ILLINOIS
Posts: 45
Likes: 41
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nineteen11
I have no history on this revolver. It was a gift from a good friend that has since passed away. I've had it for at least 40 years. There are British proof marks all over it and the words "NOT English make" are stamped on the barrel and frame. S/N is 817xxx. It is .38 S & W, not .38 Special. Condition is pretty good considering it's age. Some pitting and bluing is thin. I have shot a box of ammo through it since I've had it. Works good. Needs good Cleaning and oiling, then put away. I am proud to have it. Any thoughts? Thanks for looking.
Attachment 307106
Attachment 307107
Attachment 307108
Attachment 307109
Attachment 307110
|
Very nice! Congrats!
I have one just like it, and one sent to Australia.
I love mine!
Sent from my SM-J727V using Tapatalk
Last edited by Ihave3horses; 10-13-2017 at 01:05 PM.
|
10-13-2017, 01:52 PM
|
Absent Comrade US Veteran SWCA Founding Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
It appears to be a typical BSR ( British Service revolver ) that was sold as surplus after WW2 to a British dealer who, under English gun laws, was required to have the gun proofed to make it legal to sell in Britain. Your gun was probably one of the many commercial S&W M&P revolvers purchased probably by the British Purchasing Commission,circa 1940-41, and had the commercial blue finish and originally had standard checkered walnut stocks rather than the wartime dull finish and smooth stocks. The "Not English Made" stamp was most likely applied in 1940-41 time, as that stamping was not usually seen or applied after WW2. Ed.
Last edited by opoefc; 10-13-2017 at 10:21 PM.
|
10-13-2017, 02:53 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
The 817xxx serial does place the gun in later 1941. It would indeed have had checkered walnut stocks, although not these, which are post-war from much later; actually, left and right don‘t match. The originals would have been the smaller service stocks (see attached). The finish looks well weathered but original.
I have to disagree with Ed here. The serial time frame places this gun firmly in the period of orders shipped to the British Purchasing Commission in New York in 1941, continuing until Lend-Lease began late that year. Also, the NOT ENGLISH MAKE is most certainly a post-war commercial proof; it just indicates this gun was released from service before 1955, when the Rule of 1925 was still in effect. The new Rule of 1955 eliminated it, which is why we don‘t see it often; most BSR‘s were commercially proofed in Birmingham in the later 1950s.
Last edited by Absalom; 10-13-2017 at 02:54 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-13-2017, 03:57 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 472
Liked 5,731 Times in 3,205 Posts
|
|
HELP! the left and right grip are different eras.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
10-13-2017, 06:18 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmborkovic
the left and right grip are different eras.
|
Yes. And both are wrong.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
10-13-2017, 06:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
|
|
I do know that s/n 8279xx was a late commercial shipment in 10/41 and s/n 8333xx was a BSR shipped in 10/41.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
10-13-2017, 07:04 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Targets Guy
I do know that s/n 8279xx was a late commercial shipment in 10/41 .....
|
You can‘t by any chance confirm the caliber on that one? It‘d be very unusual if that had been a .38 S&W.
|
10-15-2017, 05:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 128
Liked 37 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Many thanks to all who made comments about the gun. I learned a lot by reading them. The grip comments surprised me. Of course I have no idea when they were changed and also didn't know they were different. Ha. Very interesting. Thanks again.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|