Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2017, 09:50 AM
1srelluc 1srelluc is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 854 Times in 121 Posts
Default No Logo HE

I picked-up this "no logo" HE this morning at a yard sale for $150.00. It had a set of aftermarket walnut target stocks on it.

Serial # 285088, they match where they should. Nickled with 6" barrel. .38 spl. '09 last patent date. 3rd or 4th change.

Nice and tight, very good bore. No buggered screws.

I'm just trying to pin down the year made, factory nickle or not, and what type of stocks were original to the gun.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN6895 (2).jpg (97.1 KB, 257 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN6894 (2).jpg (91.5 KB, 1328 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN6896 (2).jpg (47.5 KB, 175 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2017, 10:36 AM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is online now
US Veteran
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,669
Liked 24,873 Times in 8,517 Posts
Default

The finish looks factory to me; however, better pics would help!

As to age, I'll guess post WW I to mid 1922. Hard rubber grips would be likely.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 10-14-2017, 10:38 AM
gmborkovic gmborkovic is offline
SWCA Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 472
Liked 5,731 Times in 3,205 Posts
Default

Oh yea, I just bought an Elmo cookie jar at a yard sale for the grand kids.
My find beats your find hands down. Great snag. Looks nice. Seam looks tight and has that nickel look. Hammer and trigger are still case colored.
Grips are not a big problem.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2017, 11:03 AM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,875
Likes: 979
Liked 18,990 Times in 9,292 Posts
Default

If the last patent date on the barrel is '09, it may have been an earlier (pre 1914) part that was assembled onto a later gun. Agree with the no logo time frame as Gil stated, likely after WW I and pre-1920. Enjoy!
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 10-14-2017, 11:07 AM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,218
Likes: 34,796
Liked 10,779 Times in 3,671 Posts
Default

Probably shipped just after WWI. The gov't quit stamping the logo during the war and S&W didn't resume until 1922. SN's just over 300K were shipping in 1920. The grips you need are hard rubber.

BTW, that is a relatively uncommon round butt M&P revolver that appears to be in decent condition. Some purists might call it a Model 1902 but I think S&W was marketing it as a .38 Military & Police revolver at the time.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629

Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 10-14-2017 at 11:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 10-14-2017, 12:49 PM
Targets Guy's Avatar
Targets Guy Targets Guy is offline
US Veteran
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
Default

This Change 3 is s/n 216902 and shipped in 10/1914. Stocks are matched to the revolver.

__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 10-14-2017, 01:40 PM
1srelluc 1srelluc is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 854 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy View Post
Probably shipped just after WWI. The gov't quit stamping the logo during the war and S&W didn't resume until 1922. SN's just over 300K were shipping in 1920. The grips you need are hard rubber.

BTW, that is a relatively uncommon round butt M&P revolver that appears to be in decent condition. Some purists might call it a Model 1902 but I think S&W was marketing it as a .38 Military & Police revolver at the time.
I figured it was around 1919 - 1920 due to some of the other serials i saw when I was looking for no logo examples.

Yeah, a round-butt 6" is sorta odd.

Here are some better pics, I just stuck a set on M10 RB stocks on it till I find a set of rubber ones.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN6897 (2).jpg (114.1 KB, 96 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN6899 (2).jpg (98.4 KB, 91 views)

Last edited by 1srelluc; 10-14-2017 at 01:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-14-2017, 02:16 PM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 1,525
Liked 1,825 Times in 736 Posts
Default

I love it. $150 at a flea market... obviously you are doing something right!

There's a set of K frame baked rubber grips on Ebay at this moment with a starting bid of around $60.

John
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 10-14-2017, 02:37 PM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,218
Likes: 34,796
Liked 10,779 Times in 3,671 Posts
Default

You know with that kind of prices for rubber grips, I think I'd put some Stags on it. There should be some Grashorns or Driskill's available.

Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-14-2017, 02:43 PM
1srelluc 1srelluc is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 854 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy View Post
You know with that kind of prices for rubber grips, I think I'd put some Stags on it. There should be some Grashorns or Driskill's available.

Guy
There is a guy I know that has a lot of old S&W rubber grips. I'll check with him next weekend when i'm out that way and see what he has.

To be honest it's not all that important to me to where I'd even consider paying some eBay robber's price for a set of rubber grips.

The ones on it will serve till i run across something.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-14-2017, 03:03 PM
jsfricks's Avatar
jsfricks jsfricks is online now
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 3,982
Liked 5,549 Times in 1,153 Posts
Default

I could be wrong but I think what your calling rubber grips and what the others are talking about is two different things. The rubber grips would look like what came on this 1899.

__________________
Get off my lawn!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 10-14-2017, 03:08 PM
1srelluc 1srelluc is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 854 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsfricks View Post
I could be wrong but I think what your calling rubber grips and what the others are talking about is two different things. The rubber grips would look like what came on this 1899.
I know. My .32-20 M1899 has a set on it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 10-14-2017, 05:19 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,965
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,345 Times in 5,471 Posts
Default

Not sure where the 1922 comes in as related to the S&W logo?? I have the following No-Logo dates: 1916 to 1919. I have a 1920 and 1921 K frame revolvers and both have the logo stamp. My thoughts are that the factory would have wanted to return to using their logos as soon as the war was over. What is not so clear is why did the company stop stamping their guns? I have heard that the government was behind the change, but why?

To confuse the issue even more, looking at my I frames, there is a S&W logo on a 1917 22/32 HFT and I have three 455 S&Ws, all with logos and all were shipped in 1916. I also have a 1919 38 Perfected without a logo.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 10-14-2017, 05:34 PM
1srelluc 1srelluc is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 854 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
Not sure where the 1922 comes in as related to the S&W logo?? I have the following No-Logo dates: 1916 to 1919. I have a 1920 and 1921 K frame revolvers and both have the logo stamp. My thoughts are that the factory would have wanted to return to using their logos as soon as the war was over. What is not so clear is why did the company stop stamping their guns? I have heard that the government was behind the change, but why?

To confuse the issue even more, looking at my I frames, there is a S&W logo on a 1917 22/32 HFT and I have three 455 S&Ws, all with logos and all were shipped in 1916. I also have a 1919 38 Perfected without a logo.
A guy on anothe forum posted this one:



He had it lettered and it said:

"was shipped from the factory on December 4, 1920 for delivery to Belknap Hardware Co., Louisville, KY with 6" barrel, nickel finish & checkered walnut round butt grips."

Made me wonder if my example should not have walnut stocks instead of hard rubber.

Last edited by 1srelluc; 10-14-2017 at 05:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 10-14-2017, 06:27 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,598
Likes: 240
Liked 29,107 Times in 14,073 Posts
Default

The closest SN I have listed to 285088 is 2853xx which shipped in 10/17. It would not have the S&W frame logo at that time. Original grips would probably have been the black hard rubber style, although it is possible it could have been shipped with checkered wood grips with the "Deep Dish" gold medallions. Originals and reproductions of the black hard rubber grips are not difficult to find.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-14-2017, 07:59 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,965
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,345 Times in 5,471 Posts
Default

Round butt K frame walnut service stocks from that era are hard to find. I have a feeling that only a small percentage of K frames from the teens went out with wood. Here are a couple examples of what you should be looking for if you want walnut.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1010005.jpg (58.6 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg P1010002.jpg (94.2 KB, 40 views)
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 10-14-2017, 08:25 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
Not sure where the 1922 comes in as related to the S&W logo?? I have the following No-Logo dates: 1916 to 1919. I have a 1920 and 1921 K frame revolvers and both have the logo stamp. My thoughts are that the factory would have wanted to return to using their logos as soon as the war was over. What is not so clear is why did the company stop stamping their guns? I have heard that the government was behind the change, but why?

To confuse the issue even more, looking at my I frames, there is a S&W logo on a 1917 22/32 HFT and I have three 455 S&Ws, all with logos and all were shipped in 1916. I also have a 1919 38 Perfected without a logo.
You're right, by ~1920 the logos were stamped again. A gun form 1917 with a logo was probably from inventory and produced before OUR ENTRY into the war.

All 455s had logos.

The Government ruled out stamping the logo on 1917s because it slowed production. After the war it took Smith a couple of years to work it back into production. Just like the bright blue finish took up to 10 years to again become the standard finish on all blue models
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 10-14-2017 at 08:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 10-14-2017, 11:05 PM
mh51 mh51 is offline
SWCA Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: central Texas
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 2,775
Liked 1,287 Times in 636 Posts
Default

I have #207xxx. It has logo on the sideplate, and walnut service grips with gold medallion. I haven't lettered it to get a solid ship date or confirmation of the grips.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-14-2017, 11:28 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,875
Likes: 979
Liked 18,990 Times in 9,292 Posts
Default

1922 may be in peoples' minds as the year of the change from the "mushroom" to the "barrel" extractor rod end...
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-15-2017, 12:26 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

May 1922 is when the MADE IN USA stamp was ordered.

Mushroom know was ordered replaced with the barrel knob was 1/22/27.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 10-15-2017, 03:43 PM
gordonrick gordonrick is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 528
Likes: 337
Liked 224 Times in 135 Posts
Default

Just for a point of reference SN 313625 (4" Nickel) has no logo and has the walnut stocks with gold medallions. No numbers found on the inside of the stocks, but with the perfect fit and wear, I am positive they are original.

Mine has not been lettered but my notes have 9/1919 as when the heat treatment of the cylinders started with SN 316648 - but, of course, that range of SN's may have shipped much later that that.

Rick
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 10-15-2017, 05:40 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

Rick,

Searching for the stock # is easier in bright sunlight with a 5 power glass.
Sometimes a photo is needed to “see” the penciled #. Finding the serial number is made much easier using The Gimps threshold tool.

SMITH & WESSON DA 45 MODEL 1917 COMMERCIAL
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-15-2017, 09:52 PM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 1,525
Liked 1,825 Times in 736 Posts
Default

Quote:
May 1922 is when the MADE IN USA stamp was ordered.

Mushroom know was ordered replaced with the barrel knob was 1/22/27.
Jim,
Any idea when the rear sight changed from the older round divot to the square cut type?

John
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-15-2017, 11:54 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

Hi John,

Aug. 14, 1923 change order: square sights on all .32 HE. .38/32 HE, .38 HE, .32 HE Winchester regular [non-target] revolvers.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #25  
Old 10-18-2017, 11:28 PM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 1,525
Liked 1,825 Times in 736 Posts
Default

That's it Jim. Thank you.

DWalt, this is what I was rather poorly trying to describe. Both HEs are 1905 M&P 4th, 38 Special guns.



John

Last edited by TIMETRIPPER; 10-18-2017 at 11:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 10-18-2017, 11:59 PM
gordonrick gordonrick is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 528
Likes: 337
Liked 224 Times in 135 Posts
Default

"Flat rear sight/top strap introduced at SN 406301 in April 1922" for the .38 M&P
I can't recall where I got this info, but I would go with what Jim said.

Last edited by gordonrick; 10-19-2017 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-19-2017, 03:10 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gordonrick View Post
"Flat rear sight/top strap introduced at SN 406301 in April 1922" for the .38 M&P
I can't recall where I got this info, but I would go with what Jim said.
I may! You may have gotten it here on the forum or right from the source; S&W 1857 to 1945, page 136: April 1, 1922 change to square front sight, replace U notch with sq notch, and flatten top strap at #406,301 on .38 HE M&P Model 1905 Fourth Change.

The Aug 14, 1923 date and information I quoted in my post above also came from S&W 1857 to 1945, Eng Changes page 235.

So obviously there is a contradiction in the book, but your reference that I quoted from the book in my first sentence of this post is clearly more specific about the change. Therefore I’m inclined to go with your date.

Thank you for that input!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 10-19-2017 at 03:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-19-2017, 07:30 AM
S&WsRsweet S&WsRsweet is offline
Member
No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE No Logo HE  
Join Date: May 2017
Location: TTown Alabama ,Roll Tide
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 9,772
Liked 2,220 Times in 1,031 Posts
Default

That is one cool old 38 m&p and what a great deal ,please please at least consider some Patrick Grashorn stags for it he makes a beautiful product .Are you going to do some shooting it if so post us a report on that ,thanks for posting kinda got my heart rate up this am.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
where is my logo trebor127 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 6 02-22-2014 12:51 AM
.38 m&p no logo gtd S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 03-15-2012 07:47 PM
Logo ID skeezix The Lounge 2 05-30-2010 03:53 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)