Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2018, 07:00 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default 1899 question

I found what I think is an 1899 shooter grade 38 special. Asking 315. My question. Does the end of the ejector rod unscrew? It looks too short and there’s no knurled end on it. I only seen a picture. My only reason for thinking it’s an 1899 is there’s no lock on the barrel. I might take a road trip to look at it this weekend. About 3 hours away from me.
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2018, 07:33 PM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

It does unscrew and is frequently missing on less-than-perfect condition examples. For 315, I suppose this shooter is one of those. The absence of the front barrel lug for the ejector rod should be obvious. Five-digit or less serial number.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2018, 07:44 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

Awesome thanks. I’m going to try for cheaper. It’s in a pawn shop so...
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 01-30-2018, 08:06 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,628
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
Default

I remember someone here was selling replacement knobs for the 1899 which had been made up in a machine shop for $100. Whether those are still available I have no idea. In any event, they were not original.

If that 1899 was in relatively good condition, I'd buy it for $315 and machine a (good enough) knob for it myself.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2018, 08:28 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is online now
SWCA Member

1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
Default

The bottom knob, blue one, in the photo at Post #9 in this thread, is the one for the 1899:
32 HE 1st Model Parts Source Post #9
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2018, 08:46 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

I’ll call them tomorrow and get more pictures
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2018, 09:12 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is online now
US Veteran

1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,972
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,362 Times in 5,475 Posts
Default

It was Mike Priwer that had some 1899 ejector rod knobs made, but he has not mentioned if he has any left lately.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:09 AM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:09 AM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

That’s the only pic I have so far.
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:45 AM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbysixkiller View Post
That’s the only pic I have so far.
Its appearance is much better than I would have expected. If you get better pictures and can verify that this is the original finish, and the gun has all-matching serial numbers, I would think that $315 is an excellent price.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-31-2018, 03:03 AM
merl67 merl67 is offline
SWCA Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,427
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
Default

If the rest of the gun looks this good even if they won't negotiate it is still a good buy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:28 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:29 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:30 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:31 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-31-2018, 12:34 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

Well I bought it just from the pictures. 315 plus tax. I took a chance but it looks pretty good to me. I’ll go pick it up Saturday and hopefully it’s nice as it looks in pictures. I figured it couldn’t burn that much.s. Serial number 17668
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby

Last edited by Bobbysixkiller; 01-31-2018 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 01-31-2018, 01:07 PM
wheelgun610's Avatar
wheelgun610 wheelgun610 is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Grinder's Switch, TN
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 1,440
Liked 1,444 Times in 664 Posts
Default

The only thing I can tell from the pics is that the stocks are newer (ca. 1910-'20) than the gun itself, but that's not a deal killer if the gun is decent otherwise.

Mark
__________________
S&W Forum Member #721
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 01-31-2018, 01:21 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is online now
US Veteran

1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,972
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,362 Times in 5,475 Posts
Default

Black hard rubber K frame service stocks made from 1899 up to WWII are the same without change, so you would have no problem finding the correct pair for the gun.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P101008.jpg (106.8 KB, 9 views)
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 01-31-2018, 02:17 PM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelgun610 View Post
The only thing I can tell from the pics is that the stocks are newer (ca. 1910-'20) than the gun itself, but that's not a deal killer if the gun is decent otherwise.

Mark
The early checkered wood stocks, while not quite period correct, by themselves should be more valuable than black rubber ones, so if you so desire, swapping them without loss should pose no problem.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 01-31-2018, 02:26 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is online now
SWCA Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 940
Liked 6,467 Times in 1,328 Posts
Default

Its definitely missing the knurled nob on the end of the extractor rod. In one of thelater pictures, with some magnification, I can see parts of the caliber roll marking.That's correct for serial number 17668. I may still have an extra extractor rod nob.

One thing to check, of course, is the condition of the bore. All too often, because of black powder usage, and perhaps not good cleaning, the bore may be pitted, sometimes badly.

In one of the pictures, the sides of the hammer and trigger looked to be somewhat polished. Could be the quality of the picture, or maybe someone rubbed them out with emery cloth.Can't tell for sure.

Regards, Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 01-31-2018, 10:31 PM
Bobbysixkiller's Avatar
Bobbysixkiller Bobbysixkiller is offline
Member
1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question 1899 question  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
Default

I’ll know more on condition in a few days. I’ll post some better pictures then too
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1899 vs K frame question earplug S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 06-28-2016 06:43 PM
Question about .38 1899 revolver Oddman S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 12 06-20-2015 08:38 PM
New guy with an 1899 question. MK75 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 02-26-2014 10:59 PM
Lemonsqueezer age & M-1899 question grayingghost S&W Antiques 2 05-12-2012 08:40 PM
question on a 4 digit 1899 fungunnin S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 16 09-29-2008 12:16 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)