|
|
04-08-2018, 11:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Remlap, Alabama
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Victory rechambered to .22 caliber
I have a victory that has been rechambered to .22 cal. with British proof marks, can anyone give me more info on this revolver?
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-08-2018, 11:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
They were done by a few British arms makers after the war, most notably Parker-Hale (which would usually be noted on the barrel).
For more insights, like the approximate origin of the original gun, we’d need at least the full serial, and maybe some pictures.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 03:09 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
You'll probably find the chambers and barrel have liners to convert to .22 Cal. British arms makers did quality work.
Of course it no longer has any collector value but still a very nice shooter in an economical caliber.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 07:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
I’ll have to disagree slightly with my “brother in arms” Hondo44. While a purist S&W collector might have no interest in this “altered” revolver, there could be interest in it as what it now represents, to wit, a view into what happened during then after WW II. It will never approach the value of a Registered Magnum, of course, but it does have historical and therefore its own collector value, just with a different group of collectors. JMHO, YMMV!
Froggie
PS Regardless of your view on collectibility, pictures would be good... we like pictures!!
Last edited by Green Frog; 04-09-2018 at 07:41 AM.
Reason: Add PS
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 08:16 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
|
|
And a serial number can always be given as 1234XX if you wish.
__________________
Jeb
|
04-09-2018, 08:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Remlap, Alabama
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Victory rechambered to .22 cal.
Serial# V745161
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 08:47 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
|
|
I have always loved seeing these conversions.
They are a neat example of old world craftsmanship, that I much admire.
__________________
NRA Instructor
|
04-09-2018, 09:09 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 326
Likes: 58
Liked 802 Times in 172 Posts
|
|
Question for you guys ...so the victory has no frame mounted firing pin like the other .22 smiths...did they mod the firing pin or did it work just fine?
|
04-09-2018, 09:14 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog
I’ll have to disagree slightly with my “brother in arms” Hondo44. While a purist S&W collector might have no interest in this “altered” revolver, there could be interest in it as what it now represents, to wit, a view into what happened during then after WW II. It will never approach the value of a Registered Magnum, of course, but it does have historical and therefore its own collector value, just with a different group of collectors. JMHO, YMMV!
Froggie
PS Regardless of your view on collectibility, pictures would be good... we like pictures!!
|
Well I'll have to agree. Another collector niche could be filled with these by different calibers (although usually just two, 22 and 38 Spl), but also by the different arms makers that converted them. Give me a firearm and I'll figure out a "need" to collect more than one of them!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 09:19 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vbk76
Question for you guys ...so the victory has no frame mounted firing pin like the other .22 smiths...did they mod the firing pin or did it work just fine?
|
Yes the firing pin had to be modified. It can be done by lowering the pin and installing a recoil plate with a lowered firing pin hole. Or using a frame mounted firing pin.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 09:36 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 34,555
Liked 10,739 Times in 3,659 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass, wtneely! I join the call for pictures. Surely someone in Blount County has a camera?
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 09:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Yes the firing pin had to be modified. It can be done by lowering the pin and installing a recoil plate with a lowered firing pin hole. Or using a frame mounted firing pin.
|
Would it be sufficient to make a new firing pin to mount on the hammer (moving the pin itself appropriately) then change the firing pin bushing to one with an eccentric hole?
Also, why go down with the impact? I'd think in terms of moving the pin strike up so the rim would be supported by the cylinder wall rather than the extractor. Is there something wrong with my thinking on this?? I guess in the end, it wouldn't matter with this application, but I've seen a few single shot rifles that hit on the rim over the extractor, and this gives a less consistent strike and ignition.
BTW, has anyone made a study of who did these conversions? A listing of manufacturers (not just gunsmiths who only did a one-off) with the alterations they used and the markings the applied would be an interesting addition to the body of historical data we have available... just "thinking aloud" here!
Froggie
|
04-09-2018, 11:26 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog
.....
BTW, has anyone made a study of who did these conversions? A listing of manufacturers (not just gunsmiths who only did a one-off) with the alterations they used and the markings the applied would be an interesting addition to the body of historical data we have available... just "thinking aloud" here!
|
I don’t believe there is enough there to study. As far as I am aware, Parker-Hale’s .22 conversions are the only ones that are marked with a stamp identifying the converter; see attached. The other picture is a 1957 P-H catalog (with the wrong S&W pictured ).
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 02:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 13,846
Likes: 8,067
Liked 25,338 Times in 8,518 Posts
|
|
Speaking as an ‘Unpure’ Smith Collector,
I would love to have one!
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 03:09 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,362
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Those got around. I saw one in, "South African Panorama" many years ago. Some old Afrikaner used it out in the bush for snakes and small game.I think he cited .22 ammo costs as a factor in his choice.
I suppose it worked okay on true rabbits.
Another South African whom I knew said his Ruger .22 auto pistol fared badly on rock rabbits, technically hyraxes, which were quite tough to kill with a .22. He did kill a puff adder with the Ruger.
That man's Ruger was the scarce model with 5.25-inch barrel of medium weight. It would surely have generated as much velocity as a K-22 or one of those Parker-Hale conversions. Writer Skeeter Skelton clocked .22 ammo from a Walther PPK going as fast as from a longer K-22.
I don't think a .22 is enough gun for Nile or savanna monitor lizards. But I can affirm that the little green anole lizards of North America are easily killed with a .22, if you really feel a need for that. I hit one with a Hi-Standard Field King pistol and the shot blew the lizard several feet away. Maybe some muscle contraction applied? I was astounded at the power of a .22 on a lizard that size.
Last edited by Texas Star; 04-09-2018 at 03:25 PM.
|
04-09-2018, 04:29 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 39,612
Liked 18,061 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PILGRIM
Speaking as an ‘Unpure’ Smith Collector,
I would love to have one!
|
Well, call me "unpure" all you like.
But it's not a measly K frame.
It takes at least an N frame to tame the "mighty" .22 LR.
This thread lacks pictures.
__________________
Expect the unexpected
Last edited by Kurusu; 04-09-2018 at 04:35 PM.
|
The Following 26 Users Like Post:
|
824tsv, Absalom, Al W., ancient-one, Bobbysixkiller, chiefdave, D Brown, damienph, digi-shots, ExRanger714, Frank46, g-dad, harleyvato, Hondo44, Jebus35745, JohnRippert, K Frame Keith, Lewel, loc n load, lscocoa, RKmesa, Shark Bait, shouldazagged, Skeptic 9c, THE PILGRIM, Wiregrassguy |
04-09-2018, 06:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
|
|
^Now thats pretty cool!^
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 07:48 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog
Would it be sufficient to make a new firing pin to mount on the hammer (moving the pin itself appropriately) then change the firing pin bushing to one with an eccentric hole?
Also, why go down with the impact? I'd think in terms of moving the pin strike up so the rim would be supported by the cylinder wall rather than the extractor. Is there something wrong with my thinking on this?? I guess in the end, it wouldn't matter with this application, but I've seen a few single shot rifles that hit on the rim over the extractor, and this gives a less consistent strike and ignition.
BTW, has anyone made a study of who did these conversions? A listing of manufacturers (not just gunsmiths who only did a one-off) with the alterations they used and the markings the applied would be an interesting addition to the body of historical data we have available... just "thinking aloud" here!
Froggie
|
Froggie,
Moving the firing up would make it contact the upper edge of the hammer channel. Center fire pins just clear the channel as I recall.
I don't know of any 'one off' conversions. They all seem to have been done by known arms manufacturers. Not saying there weren't any.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 04-09-2018 at 09:21 PM.
|
04-09-2018, 08:55 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 952
Likes: 1,347
Liked 2,103 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass, wtneely! I join the call for pictures. Surely someone in Blount County has a camera?
|
We have cameras in Benton County, MO and can transcribe s/n's too. V601711. Well done conversion but no makers mark. Those Brits sure do like proof marks.
Last edited by chiefdave; 04-09-2018 at 08:58 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 09:23 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Very nice. It has grips from one of the converting companies. Someone will recognize the maker.
Have you looked under the barrel on the flat and under the grips for a name?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-09-2018, 10:38 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Very nice. It has grips from one of the converting companies. Someone will recognize the maker.
|
Interesting. The grips are the identical pattern as those used by Cogswell & Harrison for their .38 Special conversions, and can also be seen on Parker-Hale conversions. But the presumably proprietary crown logo on the medallion is different.
It would make sense if the various gunmakers procured these from the same wood shop and adapted them as desired.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-10-2018, 08:41 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 952
Likes: 1,347
Liked 2,103 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=Hondo44;
Have you looked under the barrel on the flat and under the grips for a name?[/QUOTE]
Looked everywhere and other than the S&W factory stamps and a multitude of British proof marks there is nothing.
|
04-10-2018, 02:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
OK, so we're talking at least Cogswell and Harrison and Parker-Hale, and I was thinking I may have seen some mention somewhere of BSA doing some. Did most sleeve the barrel and chambers of the existing cylinder or were some replacements made up from scratch?
It just occurred to me that the extractor would have been a challenge... you would either have to build up the original to reach the smaller 22 LR case rim or make a complete new unit with its relatively complex system of notches for the hand to engage and allow the movement needed to bring up the next round. Neither of these solutions strikes me a particularly simple.
Of course there's also the matter of adjustable sights of one sort or another that got added on to some/most examples. Were these available from some entity in England or did the various manufacturers each build their own variety?
I had taken for granted that this could have been sort of a postwar cottage industry. Now I'm beginning to see why it would have been a factory undertaking rather than a small shop, one-off type of endeavor. I still find the whole topic to be interesting though, having had a couple of small experiences in caliber changes. Thanks all (especially Jim) for your forbearance with my ramblings and speculations!
Froggie
Last edited by Green Frog; 04-10-2018 at 02:18 PM.
|
04-10-2018, 04:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Yes the firing pin had to be modified. It can be done by lowering the pin and installing a recoil plate with a lowered firing pin hole. Or using a frame mounted firing pin.
|
My converted New model 3 Target Model had the firing pin position changed to hit rimfire. This one was converted by a railroad blacksmith/machinist in the 20s in the Santa Cruz, Ca. Area. His grandson who I bought it from 1 1/2 years ago said it’s the only one he knows of his grandad made.
Wtneely, can you post your gun showing the extractor star?
Last edited by Wyatt Burp; 04-10-2018 at 05:54 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-10-2018, 05:38 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog
OK, so we're talking at least Cogswell and Harrison and Parker-Hale, and I was thinking I may have seen some mention somewhere of BSA doing some. Did most sleeve the barrel and chambers of the existing cylinder or were some replacements made up from scratch?
It just occurred to me that the extractor would have been a challenge... you would either have to build up the original to reach the smaller 22 LR case rim or make a complete new unit with its relatively complex system of notches for the hand to engage and allow the movement needed to bring up the next round. Neither of these solutions strikes me a particularly simple.
Froggie
|
As shown in the N frame conversion above and other hand ejectors, the chamber liners are left protruding from the rear face of the chambers. It leaves a space on the edge of the cyl that still aligns with the frame stud. A plate like a large washer is added to the ejector star which is fit flush with the liner protrusions. This corrects the headspace issue. The plate is reamed and recessed with the chambers. The star notches are still original. One can also see the hole in the recoil plate (FP bushing) has been elongated downward for a lowered firing pin.
The NM #3 above was done a little more complicated: a plate is screwed to the rear cyl face. It's smaller diameter than the cyl face which again leaves an edge to align with the cyl retaining hook on the frame latch. The ejector star is also left original with a plate added like the hand ejector above.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 04-13-2018 at 08:44 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-11-2018, 06:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 169
Likes: 3
Liked 225 Times in 95 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-11-2018, 06:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 169
Likes: 3
Liked 225 Times in 95 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-11-2018, 08:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Mk VII:
Thanks for posting these. I‘ve had these as ****** low-resolution pictures off Google, but yours are the first high-resolution clearly readable renditions I‘ve seen
|
04-11-2018, 10:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,575
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,924 Times in 3,545 Posts
|
|
I for the most part consider myself a purist collector and I do try to find the most original and pristine examples of any model within my budget. I promote the use of terms like stocks, yoke and checking as used by the founders out of respect for their genius and because I have OCD.
All that said, I can still appreciate alterations like these and also those done by individual gun owners to personalize or improve their favorite firearm. I do believe that there is a niche for collecting guns like these just as there are those that have made a collection of S&W copies like those from Belgium, Russia and Spain.
There was a huge surplus of guns after the war and I'm sure that the Brits saw a market for the much smaller and less powerful .22 round as opposed to their original caliber.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-12-2018, 11:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Remlap, Alabama
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass, wtneely! I join the call for pictures. Surely someone in Blount County has a camera?
|
Added 2 pix.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 12:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Remlap, Alabama
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=Wyatt Burp;139996112]My converted New model 3 Target Model had the firing pin position changed to hit rimfire. This one was converted by a railroad blacksmith/machinist in the 20s in the Santa Cruz, Ca. Area. His grandson who I bought it from 1 1/2 years ago said it’s the only one he knows of his grandad made.
Wtneely, can you post your gun showing the extractor star?
Added Pix of cylinder
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 12:33 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
So if I read the serial on the cylinder face correctly as V 745161, the gun originally was a late-war BSR from Nov./Dec. 1944.
It was definitely converted, refinished, and properly proofed for .22 at the Birmingham proofhouse. The stocks are not the usual British replacement style, but imitation magnas; I can’t make out the logo on the medallion.
I can detect no other markings indicating the converter’s identity.
Last edited by Absalom; 04-13-2018 at 12:39 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 05:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 763
Likes: 1,155
Liked 1,125 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Here is a 1917 that I have had for a long time. It was converted to 22LR but from what the previous owner said it was done in the United States. There are no proof marks of any kind.
Period correct adjustable sites were installed and the revolver is as accurate as any of my model 17's.
I could only find a couple pictures but I can take more is anyone wants. http://attachment.php?attachmentid=3...15236131543123
__________________
NRA Range Safety Officer
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 08:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
[quote=Wtneely;139998880]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt Burp
My converted New model 3 Target Model had the firing pin position changed to hit rimfire. This one was converted by a railroad blacksmith/machinist in the 20s in the Santa Cruz, Ca. Area. His grandson who I bought it from 1 1/2 years ago said it’s the only one he knows of his grandad made.
Wtneely, can you post your gun showing the extractor star?
Added Pix of cylinder
|
Just amazing. Honda, compare this extractor with the others. You have such a great eye for it. And look at Jim R’s 1917 above. Yet another variation. There sure were some great gunsmiths around then who deserve recognition. Though they remain nameless we are actually paying them tribute here.
|
04-13-2018, 11:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 1,551
Liked 9,320 Times in 4,181 Posts
|
|
I seem to recall some “blank” extractors (complete disk... no chamber cuts) being offered for sale at one time. I wonder whether this might have been a use for them. Then again now that I see Hondo44’s description, I guess that would be adding an unnecessary extra step.
Froggie
|
04-13-2018, 03:14 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
[quote=Wyatt Burp;139999073]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wtneely
Just amazing. Honda, compare this extractor with the others. You have such a great eye for it. And look at Jim R’s 1917 above. Yet another variation. There sure were some great gunsmiths around then who deserve recognition. Though they remain nameless we are actually paying them tribute here.
|
Yes, yours looks to have been done the same way as Jim R's and the N frame in post #16.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
04-13-2018, 03:47 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 39,612
Liked 18,061 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim R
Here is a 1917 that I have had for a long time. It was converted to 22LR but from what the previous owner said it was done in the United States. There are no proof marks of any kind.
Period correct adjustable sites were installed and the revolver is as accurate as any of my model 17's.
I could only find a couple pictures but I can take more is anyone wants. http://attachment.php?attachmentid=3...15236131543123
|
Mine revealed itself a tack driver also.
__________________
Expect the unexpected
|
04-13-2018, 08:41 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim R
Here is a 1917 that I have had for a long time. It was converted to 22LR but from what the previous owner said it was done in the United States. There are no proof marks of any kind.
Period correct adjustable sites were installed and the revolver is as accurate as any of my model 17's.
I could only find a couple pictures but I can take more is anyone wants. http://attachment.php?attachmentid=3...15236131543123
|
Is the barrel also lined? It might be an after market barrel blank, that's the only I figure they could get the front sight so much too far back from the muzzle.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 10:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 763
Likes: 1,155
Liked 1,125 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Here are some pic's of the barrel, I think it may be a new barrel blank, but who knows. http://attachment.php?attachmentid=3...67234423672315
__________________
NRA Range Safety Officer
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-13-2018, 10:57 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
It appears to be an original barrel with address/patent dates on top.
The muzzle has a concave target crown which shows the liner seam. The front sight appears to be original and integral with the barrel, but appears to have a muzzle cap. If the barrel measures ~5 3/4" instead of 5 1/2", a cap has been added, for what reason I don't know.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 04-14-2018 at 05:07 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|