|
|
04-15-2018, 03:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
S&W Victory original or replacement barrel?
I received a factory letter on my recent purchase of a Victory model that stated it was shipped to the United States Strategic Services with a 2" barrel so the 4" barrel must be a replacement.
I sent a followup letter to the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation about a month ago asking if the barrel may in fact be original and have not yet received a response, so I thought I'd ask the opinions of those on this forum.
My letter stated the serial numbers on the frame, barrel flat, cylinder,extractor star, and grip panel all match. Also the numbers on the crane and crane recess match. The revolver has no markings to reflect a arsenal repair or barrel replacement. And that the barrels finish, color, and wear match the frame and cylinder. The barrel flat shows a V 655626 P, this P is also on the back of the cylinder and left side plate. I thought the P proofs were applied at the factory during original assembly.
I've enclosed pics for consideration
Thanks
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-15-2018, 04:03 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 917
Liked 6,392 Times in 1,311 Posts
|
|
Well - if it letters as a 2", then that is probably what it was. It's curious that someone
would want to change the barrel to 4"; a 2" USSS gun ought to be important. One thing you might do is write Roy Jinks a letter, asking him to confirm that V655626 was really shipped as a 2" gun. Include a copy of the factory letter that he sent you.
I assume the V655626 is the number on the butt of the frame . Check this very carefully, to make sure that you have the correct serial number.
Regards, Mike Priwer
Last edited by mikepriwer; 04-15-2018 at 04:05 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-15-2018, 04:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer
Well - if it letters as a 2", then that is probably what it was. It's curious that someone
would want to change the barrel to 4"; a 2" USSS gun ought to be important. One thing you might do is write Roy Jinks a letter, asking him to confirm that V655626 was really shipped as a 2" gun....
|
That would be my recommendation, too. A change from 2” to 4” does indeed make little to no sense, especially when everything looks original. I know that there are more OSS-shipped guns in that general serial range from late summer 1944. I’ve seen letters, all 4-inchers if I recall correctly, so you want to eliminate the chance of a typo first.
Last edited by Absalom; 04-15-2018 at 04:20 PM.
|
04-15-2018, 04:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Yes, the V655626 is stamped on the barrel flat, butt of frame, cylinder, and extractor star.
I had sent Mr Jinks a letter care of the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation stating what I wrote in my post and the above pictures along with the original factory letter about a month ago. I've not received any type of response as of today.
Thanks for your response
|
04-15-2018, 04:33 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 88,960
Liked 24,781 Times in 8,482 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
04-15-2018, 04:42 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 998
Liked 4,494 Times in 1,232 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wcpffa1
Yes, the V655626 is stamped on the barrel flat, butt of frame, cylinder, and extractor star.
I had sent Mr Jinks a letter care of the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation stating what I wrote in my post and the above pictures along with the original factory letter about a month ago. I've not received any type of response as of today.
Thanks for your response
|
Welcome to the forum! It will be interesting to see what the SWHF comes up with and I hope you'll share the results with us when you get them. For now, I would agree with the others that the most logical explanation is a typo in Roy's letter. If possible, please post the letter and pictures of the butt and top strap.
__________________
Kevin Williams SWCA1649 HF208
|
04-15-2018, 04:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Requested pic of Butt
Here's a picture of butt with the "W" and what looks like a "F" and "U" stamped in the wood.
|
04-15-2018, 05:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,409 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Guns get rebuilt and parts get swapped all the time for various reasons. I have a VM that I put a 5" barrel on to replace a damaged 4" original. It happens. If your gun was indeed a 2" VM that's a real shame as it would be worth a lot of money in original configuration. If the letter is correct (and mistakes do happen I would ask that the barrel length be confirmed) then somebody really messed up a rare gun. But I'm sure there was a good reason to do it...and the owner had no idea what he was doing.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
04-15-2018, 05:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,616
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,613 Times in 3,452 Posts
|
|
The barrel SN appears hand-stamped as the numbers do not align as they would if originally roll-marked. Probably a replacement, but also probably done early at the factory, possibly before it was shipped originally. There are also frequent errors in the shipping logs, as well a missed entries.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
|
04-15-2018, 06:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
The barrel SN appears hand-stamped as the numbers do not align as they would if originally roll-marked.....
|
Serials on Victorys were always hand-stamped, never roll-marked.
|
04-15-2018, 07:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
pictures of top strap and factory letter
I've attached pics of the top strap (it's unmarked) and the factory letter as requested.
Thanks to all for the responses
|
04-15-2018, 07:09 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wcpffa1
I've attached pics of the top strap (it's unmarked) and the factory letter as requested.
Thanks to all for the responses
|
Okay, that changes things a bit. The sentence about “the 4” barrel must be a replacement” eliminates a typo on Roy’s or Don’s part as the explanation. Whatever document, likely the invoice, they were looking at must have indeed said 2”.
Given its appearance, I’m still not convinced this gun isn’t an original 4”, though.
Since it has the under-barrel P proof, part of the triple military proof at that time, the barrel would indeed, as Alk8944 suggested, have had to be changed before final proofing at the factory, which makes no sense since shipping records weren’t created before the guns were even finished, I would think.
Last edited by Absalom; 04-15-2018 at 07:18 PM.
|
04-15-2018, 07:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,481
Likes: 236
Liked 28,945 Times in 14,014 Posts
|
|
It would seem very strange that all 500 in that order shipped to the OSS were snubbies, although it is possible that some in that particular shipment had 2" barrels. Whether the factory records show that there were other snubbies in the OSS shipment or if the 2" barrel of yours was later replaced with a 4" barrel are questions someone else would have to research.
As you may be able to tell, no one seems to know the full story about 2" Victories, other than that they are very uncommon and highly desirable in any condition. Even though I do have a small number of Victory SNs which have been documented as being shipped to the OSS, none of those on my list have 2" barrels. And none of the Victory snubbies I have listed were sent to the OSS. My guess is that there is a strong possibility that there was an error made about the barrel length in the shipping documents. It will be interesting to see if anything develops.
Last edited by DWalt; 04-15-2018 at 07:40 PM.
|
04-15-2018, 07:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,575
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,924 Times in 3,545 Posts
|
|
Quote:
The barrel SN appears hand-stamped as the numbers do not align as they would if originally roll-marked.
|
I don't believe that gun serial numbers were roll stamped. Since each number is different, it would be cost prohibitive to make a new roll stamp for every gun.
As further evidence, I own a serial number jig for the .22/32 HFT cylinders. It fits in the recesses and gives the worker a straight edge to stamp the numbers. Even with the guide, you will find numbers unevenly spaced as evidence that this procedure was done freehand.
As far as the OP's gun, I don't see the letters mentioned on the gun butt. I see the V prefix for the serial number and the "P" proof mark but that is all.
As far as the numbers in the yoke and on the yoke, they are merely factory assembly numbers added to reunite fitted parts after the finish is applied. There will or should be the same number on the back of the side plate.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
04-15-2018, 07:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,481
Likes: 236
Liked 28,945 Times in 14,014 Posts
|
|
SNs on the inside of the extractor star were definitely done by hand. I have seen some quite sloppy examples which make it appear that the numerals were stamped freehand without using a jig. Similarly, SNs on the inside flats of grips usually seem very random with no effort to make the numbers regularly spaced and aligned with each other. I have one M&P with a grip in which the last digit is double stamped.
Last edited by DWalt; 04-15-2018 at 09:55 PM.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|