Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2018, 10:20 PM
chiefdave's Avatar
chiefdave chiefdave is offline
US Veteran
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 957
Likes: 1,353
Liked 2,109 Times in 541 Posts
Default Odd caliber 1902 1st

This was listed as a 1905 but I believe it's a 1902 1st change. The odd thing about it is that the S/N's on the butt, cylinder, star and the hard rubber grips is 58811 but the barrel flat number is the same as the assembly number on the yoke, 20252, and is chamber in 38 S&W rather that the normal 38 Spl. Could this be a factory rework or possibly a special order? Should be here next week.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1902-1.jpg (49.5 KB, 176 views)
File Type: jpg 1902-2.jpg (48.8 KB, 172 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 05-09-2018, 11:13 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,588
Likes: 238
Liked 29,095 Times in 14,067 Posts
Default

More likely a frankengun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 05-09-2018, 11:24 PM
model3sw's Avatar
model3sw model3sw is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
Default

When it arrives, check for a factory re-work date on the flat grip frame (under the grips).

I once owned a factory refurbished 1899 Army that had been sent back the factory. A new barrel was installed. Instead of the correct serial number, the workman that stamped the barrel with the number "1899" (for the US Army 1899 model from the butt) and not the correct serial number of the gun, itself. To me, it was such an abomination, I sent it to a major auction house to be sold. Now, with 20/20 hindsight, I should have kept it.

Not saying this is what may have happened to yours, just verifying that the S&W factory was very capable of making errors like that. I do not think, back in the late 1800s, a factory worked needed to be literate to be employed albeit the more technical workers and foremen likely were more educated.

In the 1970s I had employed an auto body man / painter (a combo man) who was very skilled at his craft. He was approximately 50 years old at that time. I did not discover until a few years later that he was illiterate. He could not read the instructions on label of a new type of catalyzed primer we were testing out and asked me to read the directions to him.
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425

Last edited by model3sw; 05-10-2018 at 12:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-10-2018, 12:05 AM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,986
Likes: 8,972
Liked 48,738 Times in 9,247 Posts
Default

Looks like a later hammer with a hollow rivet.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 05-10-2018, 01:09 AM
rct269 rct269 is offline
SWCA Member
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,046
Likes: 916
Liked 9,929 Times in 3,648 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
Looks like a later hammer with a hollow rivet.
Okay, a hollow rivet with a little hole or a big one? I ask because I have a Model of 1902 1st Change carrying a hammer with a hollow rivet with a big hole---and a 1905 1st Change, also with a hollow rivet, but much smaller hole----and a bunch of later 1905's, all with hollow rivets with medium size holes---in between the two extremes. I'll take a stab at measuring the hole diameters if it'll help.

And what's the significance of the hole diameters?

Ralph Tremaine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2018, 01:15 AM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

It is a 5” barrel, so with a .38 S&W CTG stamp on it, it really can only be a replacement BSR/Victory barrel that was added to this frame and refinished. And someone who didn’t know better stamped it with the assembly number instead of the serial.

Pretty unlikely that the factory would perpetrate such a thing
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2018, 01:44 AM
Modified's Avatar
Modified Modified is offline
SWCA Member
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 2,589
Liked 12,778 Times in 1,815 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt View Post
More likely a frankengun.
I'm going to agree with this.

The refinish is certainly not up to factory standards. If the factory did re-chamber it someone re-finished it after that point.

Could be a lot of fun though. K-Frames in .38S&W as very pleasant to shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-10-2018, 06:24 AM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 797
Liked 3,048 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom View Post
It is a 5” barrel, so with a .38 S&W CTG stamp on it, it really can only be a replacement BSR/Victory barrel that was added to this frame and refinished. And someone who didn’t know better stamped it with the assembly number instead of the serial.

Pretty unlikely that the factory would perpetrate such a thing
If that is the case I'd bet the cylinder is still 38 Special. I've done the same swap when you could get NOS Victory barrels for $10.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 05-10-2018, 08:43 AM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 1,626
Liked 3,178 Times in 933 Posts
Default

If it's a Victory or pre-Victory barrel, it has been modified to accept the mushroom head ejector rod knob.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-10-2018, 09:02 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,962
Likes: 3,046
Liked 14,340 Times in 5,468 Posts
Default

Blowing up the picture shows no MADE IN USA, no trigger guard cylinder stop screw, and 38 S&W CTG on the barrel. Yes it is a 1902 frame. Yes it is a WWII Victory barrel.

I think the refinish is better than most, but it only takes a small file and some elbow-grease to fit a mushroom ejector rod knob, so redone for sure. Try to chamber a 38 S&W cartridge in the cylinder. If it fits, the cylinder is reworked, but if not, you will have to shoot 38 Special with a .357" bullet in a barrel measuring .361". Some of these conversions shoot fine, but lots do not.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 05-12-2018, 04:51 PM
chiefdave's Avatar
chiefdave chiefdave is offline
US Veteran
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 957
Likes: 1,353
Liked 2,109 Times in 541 Posts
Default

The revolver arrived this morning and everyone was pretty much correct on the assessment. I do disagree as to it being a Frankengun or the finish being substandard. Just a nice rework on a 100+ year old handgun. One nice touch is that whoever swapped out the barrel put the correct taper on the front sight blade. At 15 yards accuracy was fine with 38 Special hbwc's at modest velocity.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1147[1].jpg (109.4 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1148[1].jpg (108.9 KB, 42 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 05-12-2018, 08:52 PM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,516
Likes: 89,571
Liked 24,858 Times in 8,513 Posts
Default

I like 5" round butt K frames.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2018, 10:43 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,243
Likes: 11,890
Liked 20,568 Times in 8,577 Posts
Default

Clearly not a frankengun.

If you reload I would suggest using the largest bullet in your 38 Spl cases that will fit in the chambers.

Your 38 S&W barrel has a larger barrel bore (diameter between the lands) to match the .361" bullet diam of the 38 S&W Cart.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 05-13-2018, 08:51 PM
chiefdave's Avatar
chiefdave chiefdave is offline
US Veteran
Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st Odd caliber 1902 1st  
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 957
Likes: 1,353
Liked 2,109 Times in 541 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
Clearly not a frankengun.

If you reload I would suggest using the largest bullet in your 38 Spl cases that will fit in the chambers.

Your 38 S&W barrel has a larger barrel bore (diameter between the lands) to match the .361" bullet diam of the 38 S&W Cart.
I used 148 gr. HBWC's (.358") over 3 gr. of unique and the bullets seem to be engaging the rifling OK. Groups 4-5" @ 15 yards. Glad it's not too original, I enjoy shooting century revolvers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why no Caliber designation on Model 3s prior to appx 1902 model3sw S&W Antiques 15 06-22-2019 03:34 PM
.38 1899/1902/4-scr 1905 Caliber Roll Marking mikepriwer S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 5 12-20-2018 11:32 AM
M&P 1902... I think. olrodder S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 1 07-26-2014 04:59 PM
.40 caliber round mistakenly fired in a .45 caliber pistol Kelly Green The Lounge 23 06-03-2013 12:13 AM
Is this really a M&P 1902 ElmerKeith S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 07-14-2008 09:48 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)