|
|
05-09-2018, 10:20 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 960
Likes: 1,356
Liked 2,110 Times in 542 Posts
|
|
Odd caliber 1902 1st
This was listed as a 1905 but I believe it's a 1902 1st change. The odd thing about it is that the S/N's on the butt, cylinder, star and the hard rubber grips is 58811 but the barrel flat number is the same as the assembly number on the yoke, 20252, and is chamber in 38 S&W rather that the normal 38 Spl. Could this be a factory rework or possibly a special order? Should be here next week.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-09-2018, 11:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,630
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
More likely a frankengun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2018, 11:24 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
When it arrives, check for a factory re-work date on the flat grip frame (under the grips).
I once owned a factory refurbished 1899 Army that had been sent back the factory. A new barrel was installed. Instead of the correct serial number, the workman that stamped the barrel with the number "1899" (for the US Army 1899 model from the butt) and not the correct serial number of the gun, itself. To me, it was such an abomination, I sent it to a major auction house to be sold. Now, with 20/20 hindsight, I should have kept it.
Not saying this is what may have happened to yours, just verifying that the S&W factory was very capable of making errors like that. I do not think, back in the late 1800s, a factory worked needed to be literate to be employed albeit the more technical workers and foremen likely were more educated.
In the 1970s I had employed an auto body man / painter (a combo man) who was very skilled at his craft. He was approximately 50 years old at that time. I did not discover until a few years later that he was illiterate. He could not read the instructions on label of a new type of catalyzed primer we were testing out and asked me to read the directions to him.
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
Last edited by model3sw; 05-10-2018 at 12:28 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 12:05 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,020
Likes: 8,997
Liked 48,767 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Looks like a later hammer with a hollow rivet.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 01:09 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 923
Liked 9,963 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
Looks like a later hammer with a hollow rivet.
|
Okay, a hollow rivet with a little hole or a big one? I ask because I have a Model of 1902 1st Change carrying a hammer with a hollow rivet with a big hole---and a 1905 1st Change, also with a hollow rivet, but much smaller hole----and a bunch of later 1905's, all with hollow rivets with medium size holes---in between the two extremes. I'll take a stab at measuring the hole diameters if it'll help.
And what's the significance of the hole diameters?
Ralph Tremaine
|
05-10-2018, 01:15 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
It is a 5” barrel, so with a .38 S&W CTG stamp on it, it really can only be a replacement BSR/Victory barrel that was added to this frame and refinished. And someone who didn’t know better stamped it with the assembly number instead of the serial.
Pretty unlikely that the factory would perpetrate such a thing
|
05-10-2018, 01:44 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,822
Likes: 2,593
Liked 12,781 Times in 1,815 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
More likely a frankengun.
|
I'm going to agree with this.
The refinish is certainly not up to factory standards. If the factory did re-chamber it someone re-finished it after that point.
Could be a lot of fun though. K-Frames in .38S&W as very pleasant to shoot.
|
05-10-2018, 06:24 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 804
Liked 3,061 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
It is a 5” barrel, so with a .38 S&W CTG stamp on it, it really can only be a replacement BSR/Victory barrel that was added to this frame and refinished. And someone who didn’t know better stamped it with the assembly number instead of the serial.
Pretty unlikely that the factory would perpetrate such a thing
|
If that is the case I'd bet the cylinder is still 38 Special. I've done the same swap when you could get NOS Victory barrels for $10.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 08:43 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 1,628
Liked 3,178 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
If it's a Victory or pre-Victory barrel, it has been modified to accept the mushroom head ejector rod knob.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
|
05-10-2018, 09:02 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,976
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,366 Times in 5,476 Posts
|
|
Blowing up the picture shows no MADE IN USA, no trigger guard cylinder stop screw, and 38 S&W CTG on the barrel. Yes it is a 1902 frame. Yes it is a WWII Victory barrel.
I think the refinish is better than most, but it only takes a small file and some elbow-grease to fit a mushroom ejector rod knob, so redone for sure. Try to chamber a 38 S&W cartridge in the cylinder. If it fits, the cylinder is reworked, but if not, you will have to shoot 38 Special with a .357" bullet in a barrel measuring .361". Some of these conversions shoot fine, but lots do not.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-12-2018, 04:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 960
Likes: 1,356
Liked 2,110 Times in 542 Posts
|
|
The revolver arrived this morning and everyone was pretty much correct on the assessment. I do disagree as to it being a Frankengun or the finish being substandard. Just a nice rework on a 100+ year old handgun. One nice touch is that whoever swapped out the barrel put the correct taper on the front sight blade. At 15 yards accuracy was fine with 38 Special hbwc's at modest velocity.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-12-2018, 08:52 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 89,854
Liked 24,926 Times in 8,533 Posts
|
|
I like 5" round butt K frames.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
05-12-2018, 10:43 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Clearly not a frankengun.
If you reload I would suggest using the largest bullet in your 38 Spl cases that will fit in the chambers.
Your 38 S&W barrel has a larger barrel bore (diameter between the lands) to match the .361" bullet diam of the 38 S&W Cart.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-13-2018, 08:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 960
Likes: 1,356
Liked 2,110 Times in 542 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Clearly not a frankengun.
If you reload I would suggest using the largest bullet in your 38 Spl cases that will fit in the chambers.
Your 38 S&W barrel has a larger barrel bore (diameter between the lands) to match the .361" bullet diam of the 38 S&W Cart.
|
I used 148 gr. HBWC's (.358") over 3 gr. of unique and the bullets seem to be engaging the rifling OK. Groups 4-5" @ 15 yards. Glad it's not too original, I enjoy shooting century revolvers.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|