|
|
06-26-2018, 03:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 100
Likes: 790
Liked 109 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
May I have assistance in estimating the age of these Pistols.
My wife just inherited 3 Smith and Wesson revolvers.
Two are 32-20's with serial #22609 and 68237.
One is 44 special with serial # 14861.
Is there away to tell the age of these guns?
Thanks again.
Last edited by WRA; 06-26-2018 at 03:47 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-26-2018, 03:54 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
the 44 would be in the 1915 era, give or take a yr or two.
__________________
Charlie
Last edited by crsides; 06-26-2018 at 08:28 PM.
|
06-26-2018, 04:00 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
First off, we like pictures. Your 32-20 revolvers would have shipped the following years:
22609 32-20 HE, 1st Change shipped around 1906
68237 32-20 HE, 4th Change shipped around 1917
14861 44 HE 1st Model should be a Triple Lock and would have shipped around 1916. That Triple Lock would have likely been manufactures the last year of production - 1915.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
06-26-2018, 04:06 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
|
|
The 32-20' s were made in 1906 and 1915 respectively. As Charlie says the 44 was made in 1915.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
06-26-2018, 04:08 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 472
Liked 5,731 Times in 3,205 Posts
|
|
Hello Bob, and you are a new guy and welcome. Mfg. dates are not available. But ship dates are. Some 32-20s were not shipped until the 40s
but were made in the teens. Just spring for a Jinks Letter for a ship date
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
06-26-2018, 04:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: N GA
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 204
Liked 3,613 Times in 1,498 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
First off, we like pictures. Your 32-20 revolvers would have shipped the following years:
22609 32-20 HE, 1st Change shipped around 1906
68237 32-20 HE, 4th Change shipped around 1917
14861 44 HE 1st Model should be a Triple Lock and would have shipped around 1916. That Triple Lock would have likely been manufactures the last year of production - 1915.
|
I'm thinking last quarter of 1917.
|
06-26-2018, 04:23 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,687
Liked 24,880 Times in 8,519 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum.
Your wife has inherited some fine revolvers. Both .32-20s and .44 Specials are fun to shoot.
Please post pictures.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
06-26-2018, 04:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 100
Likes: 790
Liked 109 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
You guys are great!
The oldest 32-20 is in rough condition but the other one is in better shape with pearl handles.
The .44 is in fine condition also and with pearl handles.
I will post some photos shortly.
Thank you all for your help.
Last edited by WRA; 06-26-2018 at 04:51 PM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-27-2018, 05:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 171
Likes: 638
Liked 155 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
Hi Bob, you did not ask about value. The .44 Triple Lock could be quite valuable.
|
06-30-2018, 11:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 100
Likes: 790
Liked 109 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
As promised
Last edited by WRA; 06-30-2018 at 11:23 AM.
|
06-30-2018, 04:42 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
The first one is quite worn and may have been lightly cleaned to expose bright steel and not much nickel. Pearl stocks are not factory original. Maybe $275 at auction.
The second is heavily cleaned and buffed, also with after market pearls. My guess is less than $250?
That third one is not a Triple Lock. The barrel has been cut and it may be a 45 ACP Model 1917?? Is that a caliber stamped on the barrel? If it is a Model 1917 with a cut barrel and lots of wear, could be worth under $500.
Nothing cast in stone, but at least those are my best guesses.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Last edited by glowe; 06-30-2018 at 04:43 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-30-2018, 05:23 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
The 2nd photo is the N frame, a 2nd Model 44 with a serial # in the Triple Lock range, not unheard of. It's been re-nickel plated including hammer and trigger.
Shared album - Bob Atchison - Google Photos
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 06-30-2018 at 05:27 PM.
|
06-30-2018, 05:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
I just assumed the order would be the same as the original listing. So much for thinking . . .
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
06-30-2018, 06:16 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
That third [2nd] one is not a Triple Lock. The barrel has been cut and it may be a 45 ACP Model 1917?? Is that a caliber stamped on the barrel? If it is a Model 1917 with a cut barrel and lots of wear, could be worth under $500.
Nothing cast in stone, but at least those are my best guesses.
|
Gary,
What leads you to believe the barrel has been cut?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
06-30-2018, 06:37 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,701
Likes: 12,849
Liked 39,435 Times in 10,034 Posts
|
|
I thought the same thing( (barrel chopped). It may be the angle of the photo but, the muzzle appears very square and no sight is visible.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-30-2018, 07:01 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelslaver
I thought the same thing( (barrel chopped). It may be the angle of the photo but, the muzzle appears very square and no sight is visible.
|
That's the K frame, no finish. I agree on that one.
Shared album - Bob Atchison - Google Photos
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 06-30-2018 at 07:02 PM.
|
06-30-2018, 09:18 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
Just as Steelslaver says, no front sight, flat muzzle, and looks too short for a 4” barrel.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
07-01-2018, 02:08 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
That third [2nd] one is not a Triple Lock. The barrel has been cut and it may be a 45 ACP Model 1917?? Is that a caliber stamped on the barrel? If it is a Model 1917 with a cut barrel and lots of wear, could be worth under $500.
Nothing cast in stone, but at least those are my best guesses.
|
Yes I agree on the K frame. The above quote sounded like you were referring to the N frame non-triple lock.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
07-01-2018, 08:46 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Yes I agree on the K frame. The above quote sounded like you were referring to the N frame non-triple lock.
|
As I said in post #13, I ran the photos in the same order as the OP's original post, the two K frames and the N frame was listed last. Apparently they are not in the same order, but I am still having problems picking out the N frame without any size reference. The third photo with the cut barrel looks to have a larger barrel than the first two, but can't tell for certain and the photos are not identified?
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
07-01-2018, 09:59 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
|
|
Here's what I see. The 1st picture with the chipped right pearl panel is a 32-20 from the height of the front sight as compared to the 2nd. The 2nd picture is the .44. The last picture is the other .32-20 because it does not have pearls as the OP previously stated. It has had a barrel chop. I think that pretty much agrees with Jim's conclusions.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
07-01-2018, 10:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 100
Likes: 790
Liked 109 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
The markings on the barrel of gun : 32 WINCHESTER OTG
|
07-01-2018, 11:36 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
|
|
32 Winchester CTG = 32 WCF (Winchester Center Fire) CTG = .32-20 CTG
CTG = Cartridge
S&W identified what cartridge the .32 M&P chambered at different periods of the gun's production. So, all the above stamps are found on their barrels.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
07-01-2018, 12:30 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
As I said in post #13, I ran the photos in the same order as the OP's original post, the two K frames and the N frame was listed last. Apparently they are not in the same order, but I am still having problems picking out the N frame without any size reference. The third photo with the cut barrel looks to have a larger barrel than the first two, but can't tell for certain and the photos are not identified?
|
Yes, it's difficult to pick out an N frame with no scale unless you look for the 3/4" high flat area at the top of yoke on left side and the same place on the right side.
K frames do not have the flat area:
Shared album - Bob Atchison - Google Photos
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|