Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2018, 10:21 PM
dsbock's Avatar
dsbock dsbock is offline
Member
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rocky Top, TN
Posts: 412
Likes: 75
Liked 141 Times in 49 Posts
Default My New .38 S&W K200

I just got this one today. Early K200 that didn't go to the British.

"United States Property" on the topstrap, .38 Smith & Wesson (not Special), 5" barrel, no V prefix on serial number, lanyard ring, 9681xx serial number, I know the grips are wrong, I'm working on that.



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2018, 10:39 PM
dsbock's Avatar
dsbock dsbock is offline
Member
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rocky Top, TN
Posts: 412
Likes: 75
Liked 141 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quick question.

Does anyone know whether this serial number range would have the earlier checkered grips or the later smooth grips?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2018, 10:47 PM
Targets Guy's Avatar
Targets Guy Targets Guy is offline
US Veteran
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
Default

Yours would have shipped prob Mar/Apr 42. Guessing the smooth walnut grips without medallion.

My s/n 975939 shipped 4/42.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2018, 10:55 PM
dsbock's Avatar
dsbock dsbock is offline
Member
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rocky Top, TN
Posts: 412
Likes: 75
Liked 141 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Mike,

Cool, thanks for the quick reply.

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2018, 01:55 AM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is online now
US Veteran
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,502
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,055 Times in 6,881 Posts
Default

Why do you think it didn't go to the UK?

Shipped around the spring of '42 and has the property stamp. Those would be consistent with a Lend Lease gun.

I don't know it went to England or another Commonwealth country, I'm just wondering why you are so certain it didn't.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 07-20-2018, 02:48 AM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Same question as Jack.

It was manufactured around March/April 1942, when all British Service models went to Lend-lease, and it has the appropriate property stamp. It is not showing post-war British commercial proofs, but that just means it made its way back here by ways other than an official surplus dealer.

We don‘t use the K-200 designation, btw. It‘s not clear that historically anyone ever did. And personally, I‘d get some acetone and remove that hideous white from the stampings; it‘s guaranteed not historic
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 07-20-2018, 07:49 AM
S&WsRsweet S&WsRsweet is offline
Member
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: May 2017
Location: TTown Alabama ,Roll Tide
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 9,772
Liked 2,220 Times in 1,031 Posts
Default

Nice lookin revolver thanks for posting . Although the white out makes the markings easier to see I would loose it also on such a nice looking revolver historic revolver makes you wish it could talk .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2018, 02:23 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200 My New .38 S&W K200  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,643
Likes: 242
Liked 29,156 Times in 14,097 Posts
Default

9678xx shipped in 4/42. At that time, S&W was using the brush blued finish, possibly the sand blast blue (the changeover took place about that time). Yours does not look like that from the picture, but maybe it is. The correct grips would be smooth wood.

Last edited by DWalt; 07-20-2018 at 02:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K200 ? Glockshot S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 15 04-24-2018 10:03 PM
K200 Value? Lackdog S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 03-21-2014 07:25 PM
38 M&P 4th Chg or K200? tom32 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 11-04-2013 09:10 PM
Engraved K200 dstarver S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 08-04-2013 07:36 PM
K200 38/200 revolver harney71 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 05-23-2012 03:12 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)