|
|
07-29-2018, 10:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 104
Liked 3,169 Times in 604 Posts
|
|
Why I need proper stocks for 1903
I have a 1903 .32 6" Target that has a rickety pair of stocks, and the gun cleaned up like a diamond in the rough. A few rough spots like on the front sight, but all in all a 95%+ gun. Stocks are ugly. However, I decided to shoot it with my .32 Wadcutter loads and adjust the sights once I had taken the surface crud off the threads.....1st shot was dead center X....the rest is obvious....50ft target at 50'...remarkable...
Someone help me find a pretty pair of stocks...this beauty needs them...
__________________
Terry
SWCA, SWHS, IWLA, NRA
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-29-2018, 10:47 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,687
Liked 24,879 Times in 8,519 Posts
|
|
Good shooting, Terry, good shooting. Wish I could still see those fine sights.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
07-29-2018, 11:02 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,876
Likes: 979
Liked 18,993 Times in 9,294 Posts
|
|
The originals were probably the tiny hard rubber I frame stocks of the era, so I would say "ugly is as ugly doesn't" for shooting and leave those on .
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
07-29-2018, 11:36 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
What a beauty!
With the logo on side plate, target stocks, and bright blue, it was likely pre war made and shipped right after the war. Stocks are correct and don't look that bad in the photos. Are they numbers matching?
Congrats!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 07-30-2018 at 01:46 PM.
|
07-29-2018, 11:45 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,593
Likes: 3,710
Liked 8,947 Times in 3,555 Posts
|
|
Terry, those stocks look just fine to me. What is the serial number of the gun and are the stocks numbered?
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
07-30-2018, 12:40 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Maine
Posts: 587
Likes: 761
Liked 922 Times in 349 Posts
|
|
If you don't want the stocks I'll buy them!
__________________
Bob P.
|
07-30-2018, 09:38 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,348 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
It is unlikely the 32 Target model had standard hard rubber stocks. I have never seem its little brother, the 22/32 without those walnut or early hard rubber extended target stocks and the 32 Target would have been the same.
If I read your picture correctly, the 216XXX serial number fits into the 5th Model production range. The ship date seems a little late for that serial number, but maybe inventory levels were high at the time. Production shows from 1910 - 1917 with serial numbers from 102501 to 263000. It looks like the stocks have been damaged and reshaped at the top rear, but if they match the gun, not much value is lost. All the teens era stocks I have seen have a pronounced flair and shelf at the top of the stocks. Maybe the exposed grain made it easy to crack or split off at that location.
My picture below of the stocks on teens and twenties 22/32s show the 1917 era stocks on the bottom gun, 253XXX shipped in May 1917.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Last edited by glowe; 07-30-2018 at 09:39 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-30-2018, 11:52 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,603
Likes: 240
Liked 29,111 Times in 14,074 Posts
|
|
If you are dissatisfied with their appearance, there are those who are capable of restoring them to like-new condition.
|
07-30-2018, 12:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 3,650
Liked 2,227 Times in 945 Posts
|
|
Wow, that's good shooting!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|