|
|
09-02-2018, 08:59 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 4,027
Liked 5,314 Times in 1,446 Posts
|
|
Pair of 38/44 Superkings
I just recently became the new caretaker of this great Super King Target. I was very excited to get this gun as it has a few differences from my other one that I am very fond of.
It shipped directly to King gun sight company as a Heavy Duty in March of 1938. Also it shipped as a 6 1/2 inch bbl. It also has numbers matching magnas. I found it interesting they did not convert a OD. Maybe the customer wanted a smooth back strap. I intend to ask for a invoice check to see if maybe it will shed some light on that. I am in contact with a relative of the original owner.
The smooth back strap ,cockeyed hammer and red post sight are for the most part the only differences I have noticed so far.
I am very much looking forward to shooting this one as it does have some freckling on the backstrap area.
Last edited by paplinker; 09-02-2018 at 09:04 PM.
|
The Following 74 Users Like Post:
|
153, 1blindref, 410bore, 4barrel, 625-7, 6518John, ameridaddy, ancient-one, bengal fan, bigl1911, bill skebeck, Bobbysixkiller, bracebeemer, cgt4570, chiefbob81, Collects, ColtCool, CScott, daddio202, DCWilson, delta-419, Doc44, Frank46, g8rb8, gr8, H Richard, hkcavalier, Hunter Keith, JayCeeNC, Jebus35745, K Frame Keith, kennethg, Kinman, lamarw, lawandorder, Lil' LadySmith, linde, LOBO, loc n load, mikepriwer, model3sw, Model52guy, Modified, moosedog, Muss Muggins, old bear, Old_Cop, ParadiseRoad, pharmer, quinn, red9, rjm6120, RKmesa, rocknroad, Roofuss, Russell Cottle, S&WsRsweet, SAFireman, sbowenjr, SDH, series guy, shouldazagged, singleshot1, SRG, Texas Star, THEMULE, Thinnes, THREEDFLYER, Tom K, usm1rifle, usmc2427765, weatherby, wetdog, Wiregrassguy |
09-02-2018, 09:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 10,426
Liked 6,954 Times in 2,359 Posts
|
|
May I be the first to credit your good taste. That sort of quality is certainly a thing of the past. Did King work the triggers over while doing the revamp?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-02-2018, 09:42 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 4,027
Liked 5,314 Times in 1,446 Posts
|
|
I have not shot either gun yet but it seems the cockeyed hammer gun is very smooth. Both are long action.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-02-2018, 09:47 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Twin Cities
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 4,972
Liked 1,771 Times in 716 Posts
|
|
That's quite a pair! Very nice.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-02-2018, 10:21 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 928
Liked 10,021 Times in 3,683 Posts
|
|
As you likely know, King sold Super Target conversions from inventory, as well as converting customers' guns. The selection by King of a heavy duty instead of an OD to convert for inventory (assuming that's the case) is very likely due to the cost differential between the two guns. (The effort/cost to perform the conversion on either gun being essentially the same (not counting the slight head start provided by S&W on the OD).)
The Super Target option was a free standing item (rib and sights). Other options included short actions, cockeyed hammers, "honed" actions, "adjusting" trigger pulls, "balancing" mainsprings, etc,----pretty much whatever you wanted. The retail price of a King Super Target 38/44 was $61 (in 1939). I don't know how that compared to a stock 38/44 plus $20 for the installation of the rib/sights.
The bottom line is you could have pretty much anything you wanted from the pistolsmith's bag of tricks from King.
Ralph Tremaine
Last edited by rct269; 09-02-2018 at 10:23 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-02-2018, 10:31 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 4,027
Liked 5,314 Times in 1,446 Posts
|
|
Ralph,
Do you think a OD has to be milled on top or is the width of the factory sight groove wide enough to accommodate a rib? Seems using a OD would be less risky of error. Maybe eliminate all milling on the back half of the gun.
|
09-02-2018, 11:43 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 928
Liked 10,021 Times in 3,683 Posts
|
|
I know the OD has to be milled!! The channel cut in the top strap is HUGE (compared to that for a S&W target sight)--and the notch at the rear of the frame is likewise larger.
My limited exposure to King Super Targets (one gun) suggests there was no risk of error----other than failing to secure the gun in its jig (which would likely get you a sound thump on the head, and a demotion back to grinding off hammer spurs for cockeyed hammer conversions).
The first thing I did when I got mine home was to take it all apart to see what the big deal was. The only visible big deal was the milling (likely jigged off the bore) which just barely touched the barrel on either side of the front sight boss (nee stock front sight) to ensure the finished height at the front would be just so. (Other than that, nothing special/no surprises----unless you count installing the cylinder stop plunger spring in the sight (where it worked fine), and sticking the sight spring on the cylinder stop plunger (where it didn't work at all).
Ralph Tremaine
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-03-2018, 08:17 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St Augustine
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 2,314
Liked 5,696 Times in 848 Posts
|
|
Two fantastic guns Rich and I'm happy you were able to put them together. I can't tell you how much I appreciated seeing them in person. Congrats!!
__________________
Rick
SWCA #2727 , SWHF #435
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-03-2018, 09:11 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
They are both magnificent. The pre-war .38-44 Outdoorsman is one of my favorite S&W models, not only as a magnificent and accurate shooter (as they are) but with the elegance and grace of that pre-war era. Being "Kings" is just another layer of icing on the cake.
You're becoming a contender for the S&WCA's successor to, and candidate for, the "Gary Garbrecht / Ray Cheeley" Award for most quality outstanding (big dollar and unique) S&Ws discovered and owned.
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
Last edited by model3sw; 09-03-2018 at 09:13 AM.
|
09-03-2018, 09:38 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,235
Likes: 12,718
Liked 13,466 Times in 3,397 Posts
|
|
You suck,I hate you,and we're not talking anymore. There I'm done venting.
You adding Ropers ?
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-03-2018, 10:20 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 4,027
Liked 5,314 Times in 1,446 Posts
|
|
Paul,
I am definitely on the hunt to pair this gun up with some Ropers.
To me these King guns almost demand it.
Since I will be shooting this one I actually need a set as factory targets are a bit too wide in my hand.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-03-2018, 10:30 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,235
Likes: 12,718
Liked 13,466 Times in 3,397 Posts
|
|
You could always just whittle them down. I
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 10:35 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 1,112
Liked 1,865 Times in 440 Posts
|
|
Beautiful!! Congrats
|
09-07-2018, 03:09 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 28,000
Liked 45,892 Times in 4,834 Posts
|
|
Way way high on the cool meter.
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan
Last edited by RKmesa; 09-07-2018 at 04:44 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-07-2018, 06:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,024
Liked 1,283 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
Very nice pair.
__________________
Ken
|
09-07-2018, 10:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,483
Likes: 14,629
Liked 9,327 Times in 3,727 Posts
|
|
It appears to me that there is an additional difference - one has a "U" notch in the rear sight. I think that's the one you had first ...
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
09-07-2018, 11:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
|
|
Those roper stocks are beautiful.
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
|
09-08-2018, 03:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 528
Likes: 234
Liked 1,241 Times in 331 Posts
|
|
I apologize if my question is silly: am I wrong , or something is strange about the matching of the diamond magna stocks on the backstrap?
Another question: please, educate me: was the factory backstrap serrated on Heavy Duty/Outdoorsman?
After my questions, I must congratulate with paplinker: two wonderful sisters! I love these old sixguns, with their aftermarket accessories, typical of the American revolvers golden era. Here they never were imported, I can only eyeball them!
|
09-08-2018, 09:26 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 928
Liked 10,021 Times in 3,683 Posts
|
|
Grooved grip straps: Outdoorsman, yes---front and rear. Heavy Duty, don't know, but deemed unlikely.
I recall neither the point in time nor the reference, but it seems to me all hand ejector targets were grooved starting at such and such date. You likely could find the specifics in the listing of engineering changes shown in N&J. In my collection, M&P Target # 404219, shipped September 9, 1922 has smooth straps--------next closest #594161 (also M&P Target), shipped August 23, 1928 has grooved straps.
Ralph Tremaine
And to narrow it down a bit further, this from S&W's 1925 catalog---under the heading "GROOVED TANGS": "A loose but non-slipping grasp is essential for good shooting, and for many years sharply checked front and rear tangs were considered necessary. Such a checking eliminates slipping but its file-like action on the hand when the recoil takes place makes the hands sore. The grooved tang eliminates slipping even when the grip is very light, and does not make the hand tender."
Last edited by rct269; 09-08-2018 at 10:40 PM.
|
09-23-2018, 10:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 420
Likes: 1,974
Liked 550 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Very, very nice !!
|
09-23-2018, 01:38 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,534
Likes: 953
Liked 6,512 Times in 1,335 Posts
|
|
Ralph
Up earlier in this thread, you talked about examining a King revolver, and made the following comment:
Quote:
(Other than that, nothing special/no surprises----unless you count installing the cylinder stop plunger spring in the sight (where it worked fine), and sticking the sight spring on the cylinder stop plunger (where it didn't work at all).
|
What 'sight' are you referring to, and what 'sight spring' are you referring to ? Does the King rear sight assembly have some sort of coil spring in it ? The cylinder stop plunger spring, presumably, is not related to the King Super Target rib, is it ?
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
09-23-2018, 02:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 10,426
Liked 6,954 Times in 2,359 Posts
|
|
I had a King converted 38/44, it only had the front and rear sights. My eyes require me to adjust the rear sight further to the right than normal, I ran out of adjustment and during disassembly of the rear sight found a coil spring. I did some adjustment with a different length screw and length adjustment of another coil spring and got the adjustment I needed. As I recall the spring was installed, then the blade, with the adjustment screw holding everything under tension.
These Super Kings are truly magnificent revolvers.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-10-2018, 09:49 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 28,000
Liked 45,892 Times in 4,834 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rct269
...My limited exposure to King Super Targets (one gun) suggests there was no risk of error----other than failing to secure the gun in its jig (which would likely get you a sound thump on the head, and a demotion back to grinding off hammer spurs for cockeyed hammer conversions).
The first thing I did when I got mine home was to take it all apart to see what the big deal was. The only visible big deal was the milling (likely jigged off the bore) which just barely touched the barrel on either side of the front sight boss (nee stock front sight) to ensure the finished height at the front would be just so. (Other than that, nothing special/no surprises----unless you count installing the cylinder stop plunger spring in the sight (where it worked fine), and sticking the sight spring on the cylinder stop plunger (where it didn't work at all).
Ralph Tremaine
|
I inserted the photos of Ralph's TL KST in the above to throw this great thread to the top.
A link to Ralph's thread on the gun is here:
A KING SUPER TARGET
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|