|
|
09-05-2018, 10:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
.44 HE 2nd Model (1923).....Possible reamed cylinder??
So I am looking at a very nice condition 2nd Model .44 with 6.5" barrel and original finish.
Thinking maybe the cylinders may have been reamed and it will accept some brands, but not all .44 Magnum cartridges.
So obviously if it's been modified and I need to know what kind value deduction would be fair given this mod? I may still be interested in the gun for the right price.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Last edited by THREEDFLYER; 09-06-2018 at 12:29 AM.
|
09-05-2018, 11:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 11,149
Liked 12,127 Times in 1,938 Posts
|
|
I'd probably deduct about 40%--and that would be assuming that no quantity of 44 mag had actually been shot through it. JMHO
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-05-2018, 11:17 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinn
I'd probably deduct about 40%--and that would be assuming that no quantity of 44 mag had actually been shot through it. JMHO
|
The asking price is $1,650 but that was before the cylinder issue was discovered.
The timing and lock-up are excellent and the gun does not show abuse. The stocks are in nearly new condition.
No way to know how much if any heavy loads were fired down the pipe.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
09-05-2018, 11:34 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,614
Likes: 2,932
Liked 18,678 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
|
Personally, I wouldn't touch it. Whoever reamed that cylinder for magnums obviously intended to shoot magnums in it. That gun wasn't designed or built for that kind of pressure. And you have no way of knowing just how many magnums were shot through it. There could be metal fatigue that isn't visible to the naked eye or other problems just waiting to happen.
If and only IF you could get it dirt cheap AND very,very carefully examine it up, down, backwards and sideways should you even consider this gun.
But That's just my opinion. Take it for what you will.
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
AlHunt, arjay, Big Cholla, Dr Charlie, Joe Kent, Kinman, LEO918, Muley Gil, opoefc, Russell Cottle, S42N8 |
09-05-2018, 11:41 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
Is it possible that the depth of the cylinder bores could have been a bit deeper cut on some of the .44 HE's??
The reason I ask is that I just tried inserting various .44 Magnum cartridges of different manufacture and get different results. Some of them drop all the way in and others do not and have about 1/16" space between the case and cylinder face.
Here are photos showing the same cylinder with a .44 S&W Special round and two different .44 Magnum round inserted
Of course the .44 Mag case length and crimp could have something to do with it??
NOTE: The recoil plate shows very little wear, almost none.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Last edited by THREEDFLYER; 09-05-2018 at 11:52 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-05-2018, 11:50 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 2,064
Liked 3,137 Times in 644 Posts
|
|
Check all you other .44Specials...
Is the bottom of the top strap flat?
Last edited by SDH; 09-05-2018 at 11:51 PM.
|
09-05-2018, 11:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
Here is a photo of my 5" 2nd Model .44 HE with a .44 Special and .44 Magnum inserted. I don't have others to compare with.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 12:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,614
Likes: 2,932
Liked 18,678 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
|
I suppose it is possible that the cylinders were accidentally reamed a bit deep at the factory. If that were the case, the gun should be fine.
Have you examined the chambers with a good light? It they were reamed later, I would think that you should be able to see the tool marks. I know I've seen several .38 S&W Victory models that were reamed to .38 Special and looking in the chambers you could see where they had been recut.
Honestly, I think you're gonna have to wait for one of our resident .44 HE experts to chime in. This is way above my level.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 12:19 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
The chambers look factory to me, no obvious machine marks.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
09-06-2018, 12:24 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Last edited by THREEDFLYER; 09-06-2018 at 12:27 AM.
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
alaskavett, beagleye, delta-419, Jebus35745, jimgoldth, jmace57, jw mathews, Kinman, opoefc, Russell Cottle, shouldazagged, The Gila Bender, Thinnes |
09-06-2018, 05:54 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Tom,
That's a beautiful 2nd Model.
1. It looks completely righteous to me. It has the semi satin finish of the post WWI hand ejectors (until ~ 1929).
2. The re-ream marks in the chambers mentioned by Grayfox that YOU DON"T SEE is telltale that it hasn't been reamed.
3. Spin the cyl very slowly and look at the light gap between the cyl and the top strap, and the cyl and lower cyl window frame surface. If you see no variation in both lights spaces above and below the cyl notches area of the cyl, that would confirm to me that there's no expansion of the chambers. You can check the diameter of the cyl all around to make sure it's still perfectly round.
4. Look for fatigue hairline cracks from over pressure at the front of the frame will first show up as vertical cracks between the yoke cutout and the barrel threads. Check the cyl notches for hairline cracks.
5. I checked my TLs and early post war 44s; none of the chambers will take 44 Mags. Some with a heavy roll crimp will get within 1/32" from seating, but none of 5 brands of various 44 Mags will seat fully.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 09:03 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,633
Likes: 1,816
Liked 5,384 Times in 2,711 Posts
|
|
About the .38 S&W/.38-200/.38 Spl reaming. You can usually see the reaming there because the shorter cartridge has a larger diameter than the .38 Spl. The best such Victory conversion I've ever seen was done by a noted British gunsmithing firm (and so stamped) and had proof marks indicating re-proof firing in .38 Spl.
Making a .44 chamber deeper should show some difference in finish/blue. Rather than use loaded .44 Mag to check the chambers, I'd suggest either fired or resized & neck expanded cases. You should be seeing something approaching 0.125 inches between cylinder face and front of case rim. Give or take a bit depending upon case length & machining practice at the time. The differences noted in your known .44 Spl are a good guide. I'd expect the 1/8" difference in factory case length was intended to cover production variations.
Perhaps a brief note to Roy Jinks about the depth of original chambers with some details about the issue noted?
Last edited by WR Moore; 09-06-2018 at 09:14 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 09:05 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,614
Likes: 2,932
Liked 18,678 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
|
This morning I dug out my 1924 2nd Model .44 HE and tried it. .44 Mags would not seat fully in any of the chambers.
However, looking at the pictures you posted, especially the one of the front of the cylinder, I'd say that your gun has NOT been reamed. It looks completely original to me. In fact, it looks like that gun hasn't been shot much at all.
My only question would be if those slightly deeper chambers might effect accuracy?
If everything checked out mechanically, I'd buy it. However, I'd probably use those deep chambers as a bargaining point.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 11:01 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 4,763
Liked 3,674 Times in 768 Posts
|
|
Tom, I have two 2nd model .44 militarys from that period, 23403 and 24432. Neither will chamber factory .44 magnum cartridges from Federal, Remington, S&B, and Winchester. I'm assuming that you intend to collect, rather than shoot, the 2nd model in question. If that is the case, and if I were buying it, I would check it out as others have advised. If it checks out then go for it. It's a beauty. However, one day you will sell it and you will be obliged to disclose the long chambers.
__________________
Tom in AZ
Respect the Dingbat
|
09-06-2018, 11:45 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
Based on everyone’s comments and my physical inspection I now believe this is 100% factory correct and not a modified cylinder. As mentioned before the only 44 magnum that seated fully in the chamber was heavily roll crimped on a lead bullet. All factory jacketed 44 Magnum rounds would not completely seat in the Chambers.h based on everyone’s comments and my physical inspection I now believe this is 100% factory correct and not a modified cylinder. As mentioned before the only 44 magnum that seated fully in the chamber was heavily roll cramped on a lead bullet. All jacketed 44 Magnum rounds would not completely seat in the Chambers as you can see from the photos I posted.
The variation in chamber depth to the shoulder could have just been a new tool or the machine was not set up exactly when changed. Since there was no such thing as a 44 magnum at the time of production I’m sure it was not a concern to those building the gun.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 01:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Independence, OH, USA
Posts: 6,945
Likes: 28,946
Liked 7,236 Times in 2,602 Posts
|
|
Tom, you have a nice gun there and looks like it wasn’t fired much. Since you have some good opinions here from respectable collectors, what would a reduced price be considering Tom would have to reveal the lengthened chambers when he decides to sell it. What does the SCSW have for a price, I’m Sure the long bbl is not common in this model. Larry
|
09-06-2018, 02:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 10,399
Liked 6,931 Times in 2,347 Posts
|
|
I'm a 2nd Model fan and got mine out to see how it checks out and all magnum rounds chamber the same as the one of yours that sticks out 1/8" or so. That looks to me to be a very nice example of the model and should look good in any collection. I'd be tempted to try and get the price down with the difference in reaming as mentioned by others.
|
09-06-2018, 03:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
As I mentioned previously I really think the Chambers are factory done. I’m sure if we got enough of these guns out and compared all of them there’s going to be some variance. But if you inspect the Chambers on the cylinder there is absolutely no sign of machining being done on this.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 04:21 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,997
Likes: 8,981
Liked 48,746 Times in 9,253 Posts
|
|
That's a nice gun.
I don't think it has been messed with.
Ya want Bubba's phone number?
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 05:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,750
Likes: 1,642
Liked 9,151 Times in 3,380 Posts
|
|
My, that's a beautiful looking handgun.
I suspect as others do that the chambers are factory and for the 44special.
The fact that a heavily roll crimped 44mag case w/a lead bullet would drop in does not necessarily sound any alarm.
Is the roll crimped case a factory round, or a reload? If a reload, do you know if the case was ever trimmed,,ever?
Old rounds aren't much use as gauges.
The factory loads are better to gauge by. At least some consistency. Even then the specs vary from mfg to mfg as any reloader knows.
But the fact that none of the Factory jacketed loaded rounds would chamber, and they all seated to approx the same depth would tell me that the chambers are the same depth.
Simple examination will tell you if they've been recut/lengthened. The reamer marks when the operation is done will just not match up with the original and the lengthened section can usually be spotted.
Unless a very competent workman with a nasty habit of touching up details, those reamer and even followup chamber polishing marks will show,
It certainly doesn't look like any such work done on the three that can be seen from the front in the one pic.
Are there any bright marks encircling the chambers on the rear face of the cylinder?
If the chambers are deepened, the reamer goes in and cuts but the depth is generally controlled simply by the rim cutter portion of the that reamer as it comes in contact with the rear face of the cylinder.
That simple very light contact will leave a bright mark in the bluing,,at least somewhere around some, all or maybe onlyone of the chambers. But it'd be very difficult to do the job w/o touching that surface w/the reamer rim cutting edge and not leave an imprint.
A careful set up on a mill w/a depth stop would do it w/o marking the rear face if done correctly. But normally these chamber lengthening jobs are a reamer, a T handle and squirt of favorite lube juice while the cylinder is in the bench vise.
??--Wouldn't many/most(all?) common factory loaded Jacketed 44Magnum rounds if seated completely in the cylinder of these 2nd Models leave the bullet hanging at least a little bit out the front of the cylinder?
Last edited by 2152hq; 09-06-2018 at 05:53 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-07-2018, 08:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 200
Likes: 306
Liked 149 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
Just now spotted this thread. Barrel is marked 44 Special, so one would expect to be able to use that cartridge. Have you tried inserting a 44-40 case into the cylinder? It may be that a previous owner wanted to use 44-40 ammo.
Not having purchased a collectible S&W in several years, I have not paid much attention to the current market. If the chambers will accept a 44 Magnum case, I would try to negotiate a lower price, because no 44 Special or 44-40 revolver was ever made to take 44 Magnum pressures. Even the original Remington ammo from 1956, listed at 1500 fps, was later downloaded to reduce velocity/pressure because the pre-Model 29s were shooting loose. Nice-looking 2d Model HE, though.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-07-2018, 09:08 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
The longer 44-40 Cartridge reamer would extend the chamber shoulder over the 44 spl length, but not at a diameter that would accept the 44 case length.
And there would be two extra reaming rings showing in the chambers; one for the 44-40 case shoulder and one at the case mouth.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-08-2018, 01:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 318
Likes: 534
Liked 637 Times in 156 Posts
|
|
I have some factory Hornady 44 magnum brass that will just barely chamber (very tightly) in my 624, which is not modified in any way. I agree with the others that there probably is nothing wrong with the pistol, just an example of tolerance stack.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-08-2018, 02:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,467
Likes: 14,566
Liked 9,287 Times in 3,716 Posts
|
|
I recall hearing (reading) of tolerance stacking or other minor errors that would sometimes allow for loading the wrong cartridge into a firearm. It's been so long that the details evade me, but I recall enough to know that while rare, it is not impossible.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
09-08-2018, 03:52 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 472
Liked 5,731 Times in 3,205 Posts
|
|
Hello OP, that is a beauty. If you have doubt, walk away or dont shoot
magnum loads in a gun not designed for that purpose.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
09-08-2018, 10:29 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
I'd be on it like a sixteen-year-old on a pizza buffet.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
09-09-2018, 12:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,728
Likes: 1,582
Liked 8,858 Times in 3,534 Posts
|
|
From the pictures there is absolutely nothing to give any reason believe the charge holes of OPs revolver are any way different than the way they left the factory.
Chamber depth is only an issue in the original caliber if it is too short, deep chambers are not at all un-common. Some of my .38 Spl. S&Ws will come very close to chambering a .357 Magnum cartridge, but not quite! Same with my Model 24-3, close but not so close the cylinder can be closed!
I wouldn't give another thought to this gun having issues.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|