Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-28-2018, 04:04 PM
kraynky's Avatar
kraynky kraynky is offline
Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 11,425
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bc1023 View Post
1938 3.5" Registered Magnum...













I think I just peed a little when I saw those pictures. What a work of art that is. Nice photos too. I am over-the-top jealous right now, but I'm glad you shared those photos,....... p & all.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #52  
Old 09-28-2018, 05:43 PM
S.B.'s Avatar
S.B. S.B. is offline
Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 49
Liked 721 Times in 369 Posts
Default

May not have the same pedigree but, every bit as pretty as a RM, in my book.
Steve

Last edited by S.B.; 09-28-2018 at 11:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-30-2018, 06:51 AM
Mongo1958's Avatar
Mongo1958 Mongo1958 is offline
Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 354
Liked 170 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinman View Post
About the only thing I can think of that could be better on a 27-2 is the trigger. I'm not overly impressed with the triggers on pre-war Smith and Wessons and whether or not they have been worked on over the years or smoothed by decades of shooting is up for debate. I have an out of the box Model of 1955 and a pre model 29 that both have wonderful triggers, better than my 2nd Model H.E. and Triplelock. I will also say that the interior work done on the locks of the early pieces is extraordinary, pieces that are polished and carefully fitted by hand, outstanding workmanship. I think that is what sets the early stuff apart, the craftsmanship.
Your Model 27-2 has decades of Smith and Wesson technical improvements, some of which were dedicated to the trigger assembly. The Registered Magnum was GROUNDBREAKING in its significance and as such will always be an icon of firearm technology. The 27-2 is little more than a grandchild by comparison but it has the benefit of all of the improvements handed down through the generations that preceded it.
Much like the children of today, bright as they may be they will not have their metal tested by the fires of adversity such as the generations that preceeded them.
We'll put Sir.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-01-2018, 07:50 PM
Göring's S&W's Avatar
Göring's S&W Göring's S&W is offline
Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 1,279
Liked 3,344 Times in 570 Posts
Default The Original is still the Best!

When these discussions come up regarding RMs vs anything else, I often think of the old Packard ads...

Ask the man who owns one...



Nothing against a 27-2 (or variant), or a Python, or Shooting Master, etc., all are good for what they are, but it just ain't the same...

The original is still the best!

One of mine, REG #4952

__________________
}-----Jim----->
~SWCA #2732~
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #55  
Old 10-08-2018, 06:08 AM
RKmesa's Avatar
RKmesa RKmesa is offline
SWCA Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,411
Likes: 27,867
Liked 45,706 Times in 4,811 Posts
Default

Six inch RM:





Six inch 27-2:







Both are beautiful. Both are N-Frame 357s. I have not shot either of these two, but I would expect that both would shoot great. You cannot go wrong with either, but there is just something magical about the RM that puts it in a whole other class...
__________________
Richard
Engraved S&W fan

Last edited by RKmesa; 10-08-2018 at 06:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-15-2018, 10:28 PM
blasterp7 blasterp7 is offline
Member
Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2 Registered Magnum vs. 27-2  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ben Lomond, Ca
Posts: 119
Likes: 22
Liked 54 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Incredible!



Quote:
Originally Posted by bc1023 View Post
1938 3.5" Registered Magnum...












Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trade my 1st Model U.S. Schofield for your S&W Registered or Non-Registered Magnum THREEDFLYER GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 05-01-2017 09:15 AM
WTB Registered or Non-Registered Magnum Shooter to Restore or Nice Pre-27 3 1/2" Dtybrd WANTED to Buy 0 05-28-2013 09:33 PM
WTB Registered or Non Registered Magnum Shooter Grade/Restoration and a 27-8 3 1/2" Dtybrd WANTED to Buy 4 01-09-2013 09:48 PM
[SOLD] Lew Horton S&W Model 27 Performance Center .357 Magnum !!! (Registered Magnum) twogunjay GUNS - For Sale or Trade 6 08-01-2010 09:06 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)