|
|
09-29-2018, 06:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
Transition Revolver .38 Spec. to .357 Mag.
Just added a .38/44 Heavy Duty Model of 1950 to my collection last week (ci. 1951). Originally added to the S&W line, I believe, in the early 30s, many think of it as the transition piece from the .38 Special to the .357 Magnum. Thanks to John Culina, it was his parting deal for me as he left for Oregon last week.
__________________
Ed
Last edited by OldChief; 09-29-2018 at 06:41 PM.
Reason: Add Pictures
|
The Following 20 Users Like Post:
|
31FordA, 4barrel, 6string, ABPOS, alwslate, bmcgilvray, CajunBass, daddio202, eb07, JH1951, Kansasgunner, Lee's Landing Billy, LEO918, leonardocarrillo, OLDSTER, Old_Cop, ParadiseRoad, Russell Cottle, snowman.45, Thinnes |
09-29-2018, 07:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 603
Likes: 2,096
Liked 894 Times in 397 Posts
|
|
Exelente,muy lindo revolver,
gracias por mostrarlo
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-29-2018, 07:35 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: trail's end in ol' Wyo
Posts: 7,245
Likes: 17,470
Liked 18,437 Times in 5,045 Posts
|
|
That's a dandy!
I have one of those on my want list, but I keep stumbling to more old Chiefs. (I couldn't resist.)
__________________
Wrangler of stray Chiefs
Bob
|
09-29-2018, 08:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: West
Posts: 309
Likes: 36
Liked 558 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
The .38/44 Outdoorsman is definitely a super strong .38, and will handle the hottest .38 Specials around. Extremely accurate in the later target version with 6.5" barrel and target sights.
I have a 1951 vintage 6.5" and haven't had it more than a few months. But it shoots better than I can hold.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-29-2018, 09:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm93
The .38/44 Outdoorsman is definitely a super strong .38, and will handle the hottest .38 Specials around. Extremely accurate in the later target version with 6.5" barrel and target sights.
I have a 1951 vintage 6.5" and haven't had it more than a few months. But it shoots better than I can hold.
|
Being in California, I can't pick up my revolver until Monday the 8th of Oct (10 day wait). John assured me that it's a shooter so I'm sure it is. I took the pictures at the gun shop.
__________________
Ed
|
09-30-2018, 03:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,221 Times in 3,013 Posts
|
|
OP the hammer spur on your HD looks a bit different from the norm to
me. I have a renickeled shooter grade 4" HD that dates to 1950 that
has a standard width trigger and a hammer that has a similar shape to
the one on your new to you HD from 1951. Is there any significance to
this style hammer or just something random? Anyone have an answer?
|
09-30-2018, 11:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Bradenton, florida
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 5,318
Liked 3,465 Times in 917 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwslate
OP the hammer spur on your HD looks a bit different from the norm to
me. I have a renickeled shooter grade 4" HD that dates to 1950 that
has a standard width trigger and a hammer that has a similar shape to
the one on your new to you HD from 1951. Is there any significance to
this style hammer or just something random? Anyone have an answer?
|
Looks to me the hammer is of the then new style short action style. Just after WWII S&W developed a system with shorter lock time and it was gradually phased in as old parts (long action fish hook hammers) were used up.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 09:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio202
Looks to me the hammer is of the then new style short action style. Just after WWII S&W developed a system with shorter lock time and it was gradually phased in as old parts (long action fish hook hammers) were used up.
|
It's my understanding from everything I've read that my revolver should have a short action. Also, I'm not a purest when it comes to collecting, I collect to shoot.
__________________
Ed
Last edited by OldChief; 10-01-2018 at 09:11 AM.
|
10-01-2018, 10:34 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,223
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
|
|
S&W developed the short throw action before WWII and implemented it on the K22 Masterpiece (K22/40). After the war, they implemented the short throw "speed hammer" on all the K frame target guns and extended the short throw to all its guns beginning in 1948. The action on Ed's .38/44 is short throw.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
10-01-2018, 11:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: West
Posts: 309
Likes: 36
Liked 558 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
Your hammer appears to be the same as my 1951 6.5" .38/44 target model. At least I see no difference in yours and mine? I see numerous other differences, but yours is the standard Outdoorsman, and those differences are correct.
|
10-01-2018, 11:27 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,687
Liked 24,881 Times in 8,519 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio202
Looks to me the hammer is of the then new style short action style. Just after WWII S&W developed a system with shorter lock time and it was gradually phased in as old parts (long action fish hook hammers) were used up.
|
I believe the "fish hook" hammer was a early short action design.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 02:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,111 Times in 14,074 Posts
|
|
Your HD may be from a bit later than 1951. If you can provide the SN it can be approximately dated. The target grips may not be original, but a worthwhile addition as they do not have the football-shaped cutout on the left panel. It is not unusual to find .38/44 HDs which have had their chambers elongated to accept .357 Magnum cartridges, and you should check for that. I don't believe that the N-frames ever used the fish hook-style "high speed hammer" as the K-frames did in 1948 and later. They went straight to the semi-target style hammer around 1950-51
"Your hammer appears to be the same as my 1951 6.5" .38/44 target model. At least I see no difference in yours and mine? I see numerous other differences, but yours is the standard Outdoorsman, and those differences are correct."
It's a Heavy Duty, not an Outdoorsman.
Last edited by DWalt; 10-01-2018 at 02:40 PM.
|
10-01-2018, 04:15 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
The OP's 38-44 HD has either a modified high speed action hammer or more likely the new 1950 standard medium wide target hammer from the N target models.
This is the N frame narrow high speed action hammer used on fixed sight guns from 1950 to the mid '50s ('48 to mid '50s on the K frame):
Photo by Hoosier45
K frame short actions used the high speed hammer; narrow on fixed sight guns and the same as the N frame,
BUT on target guns, the K used a unique to K frames, med wide target high speed hammer that actually spawned the "fishhook" nickname:
Photo by RdrBill
Short actions began in 1948 on the K frame and 1950 on the N frames.
NOTE: I frames did not have an action change.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 04:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,223
Likes: 34,805
Liked 10,783 Times in 3,674 Posts
|
|
High-speed hammers began to show up on non Target K frame guns in 1948.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 04:51 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Guy,
That's correct as you posted in post #9 and I, in post #13.
And the OP's HD hammer started life as a 38-44 Outdoorsman (all N frame targets) hammer like this:
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 07:38 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,687
Liked 24,881 Times in 8,519 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
Your HD may be from a bit later than 1951. If you can provide the SN it can be approximately dated. The target grips may not be original, but a worthwhile addition as they do not have the football-shaped cutout on the left panel. It is not unusual to find .38/44 HDs which have had their chambers elongated to accept .357 Magnum cartridges, and you should check for that. I don't believe that the N-frames ever used the fish hook-style "high speed hammer" as the K-frames did in 1948 and later. They went straight to the semi-target style hammer around 1950-51
"Your hammer appears to be the same as my 1951 6.5" .38/44 target model. At least I see no difference in yours and mine? I see numerous other differences, but yours is the standard Outdoorsman, and those differences are correct."
It's a Heavy Duty, not an Outdoorsman.
|
I had the same thought, but then I realized he was referring to only the hammer, not the revolver itself.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 08:33 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio202
Looks to me the hammer is of the then new style short action style. Just after WWII S&W developed a system with shorter lock time and it was gradually phased in as old parts (long action fish hook hammers) were used up.
|
There are no long action fishhook hammers. The introduction of the speed action (short action) introduced the new style hammers at the same time:
Narrow style on fixed sight guns like the 38-44 Heavy Duty and M&Ps. The speed action semi target (fishhook) hammer only on the K frame targets. (With the exception of the pre war K22/40 which has the speed action (short action) but a modified pre war hammer.)
But the N frames with target sights like the 38-44 Outdoorsman got the current style med target standard hammer. That's the hammer on the OP's HD, but it's had the course checkering removed and fine checkering applied which extends onto the spur in front of the wide pad:
Photo by OldChief
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 10-01-2018 at 08:52 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 08:38 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,002
Likes: 8,981
Liked 48,747 Times in 9,254 Posts
|
|
The OP's gun has a standard hammer that has been altered to add a wide spur.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-01-2018, 08:55 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
The OP's gun has a standard hammer that has been altered to add a wide spur.
|
I can buy that too. That was my 1st option in post #13.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
10-01-2018, 11:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
Your HD may be from a bit later than 1951. If you can provide the SN it can be approximately dated. The target grips may not be original, but a worthwhile addition as they do not have the football-shaped cutout on the left panel. It is not unusual to find .38/44 HDs which have had their chambers elongated to accept .357 Magnum cartridges, and you should check for that. I don't believe that the N-frames ever used the fish hook-style "high speed hammer" as the K-frames did in 1948 and later. They went straight to the semi-target style hammer around 1950-51
"Your hammer appears to be the same as my 1951 6.5" .38/44 target model. At least I see no difference in yours and mine? I see numerous other differences, but yours is the standard Outdoorsman, and those differences are correct."
It's a Heavy Duty, not an Outdoorsman.
|
The SN is S82187, I researched it in the 4th ed. of the catalog and came up with 1951.
__________________
Ed
|
10-01-2018, 11:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,606
Likes: 240
Liked 29,111 Times in 14,074 Posts
|
|
The first of the short-actioned N-frames appear to have begun shipping in September 1950, in the S79xxx SN range. The closest SN I have on my list to yours is S828xx which shipped in 2/52.
|
10-02-2018, 11:26 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldChief
The SN is S82187, I researched it in the 4th ed. of the catalog and came up with 1951.
|
The dates in the SCSW are closer to production dates rather than ship dates, so you're likely right and it could have shipped in 1952. There's no telling how long it sat in the vault.
That's why I prefer a production date anyway because it will more likely match features on the gun compared to a ship date, when the timing of change transition happens to be close to the production date.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|