|
|
10-12-2018, 04:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Need help identifying inherited 38
image.jpg
This 38 S&W Special has no model number and s/n 186xx, about a 4 inch barrel, and pearl grips. Was wondering what model it is, year of mfg, and if ok to shoot standard loads.
Thanks!!
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 04:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 04:45 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum.
You've got an early Model 1899 Hand Ejector, the granddaddy of all K-frames. Produced likely around 1900/01.
Besides the very regrettable fact that someone mutilated the hammer, it looks all original in great shape, and even the MOP grips appear to be factory.
Yes, standard mild target loads are okay. The early cylinders weren't hardened, so stay away from hot stuff (although it won't blow up the gun either.)
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 05:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the info, any idea on value?
|
10-12-2018, 05:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,299 Times in 1,902 Posts
|
|
I might pay $300-$350 for that one. That has very little to do with the book value.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
10-12-2018, 05:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,841
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass! I think the factory Pearls by themselves would be worth $200 to $300. Add on top of that about $400 to $450 for the gun and you could be up in this $600 to $700 range. Yep even with the bobbed hammer.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 05:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Midwest
Posts: 576
Likes: 375
Liked 678 Times in 247 Posts
|
|
"Mutilated the hammer" may be a bit unfair. If someone bought a beautiful antique gun today and did that I agree - buy a modern gun with a spurless hammer. There are plenty.
But the gun may have been very young when that was done. I bought a Ruger 10/22, a classic gun. I changed the sights, trigger, barrel and stock. It is better now. Not for a collector. I hope guns are still legal in 100 years. I have all the original parts. But someone, kid, grandkid, great grandkid, will undoubtedly separate the gun from the parts. A collector in 2104 (100 years later) may complain that the gun was mutilated. I had my reasons. The trigger was too heavy and the aperture sights that I installed make it a lot more accurate. The barrel? Probably helps but not noticeably. The stock? Looks cool. My gun.
By the way that gun of yours is sweeeet! Bobbed hammer or no.
Last edited by Pondoro; 10-12-2018 at 06:31 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 05:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Warsaw, Missouri
Posts: 960
Likes: 1,356
Liked 2,110 Times in 542 Posts
|
|
You may want to consider removing the pearl grips and installing something less valuable prior to shooting. great revolver.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 06:19 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 564
Likes: 3,645
Liked 4,249 Times in 436 Posts
|
|
Nice old gun! Beautiful grips.
Couldn't help myself ... rightside-upped the photos ...
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
4barrel, bigwagon, chiefdave, H Richard, Inusuit, JH1951, Muley Gil, ParadiseRoad, sholsclaw, two-bit cowboy, vonn, Wiregrassguy |
10-12-2018, 06:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 200
Likes: 306
Liked 149 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
I agree with the idea of installing other grips to shoot. Old pearl grips can crack from recoil. You can add plastic imitation pearl or a wrap-around rubber grip--whatever feels good in yr hand when shooting.
I don't know if y)ou'd want to spend $75 for a factory letter, but if you describe the gun in detail, 4" bbl, serial number & any other marks, etc, the letter could tell you whether the pearl grips came from the factory & if the hammer spur was removed by the factory. (S&W could do that on special order.) Can you cock the hammer by hand to stay back & fire single-action? I ask because sometimes the hammer is modified internally to fire double-action only. Be sure to mention in yr inquiry to the factory if this is the case, but I think that would be unusual on that 1899 model.
For future use, read the "sticky" on top of the forum category about identifying yr revolver. Also look at bottom of barrel & rear of cylinder to see if serial numbers match with the number on the butt._
Last edited by jw mathews; 10-12-2018 at 06:48 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-12-2018, 09:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,630
Likes: 241
Liked 29,143 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
I have never compared the two, but was the M1899 hammer different from the M1902 hammer? Not sure I would pay $75 for the letter, as it is fairly certain the MOP grips are factory. It doesn't make much difference if they are original to the revolver or not. MOP grips should be put away for safekeeping as they are a little delicate. I'd think yours probably shipped in the late 1901-early 1902 period based upon some reasonably nearby SNs on my list.
|
10-13-2018, 11:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Liked 153 Times in 88 Posts
|
|
I love it - has a lot of character and the bobbed hammer is part of the history of it. you say inherited it - do you know any of the history of it?
|
10-14-2018, 10:10 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,020
Likes: 8,997
Liked 48,767 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
NICE!
If those grips are as nice as they appear to be, they are easily worth $600. The early pearl K frame grips with the SMALL gold medallion are rare!
If I were selling that gun, I'd price it at $1000-1200, assuming the pearls are real nice and the gun is all original except for the bobbed hammer.
Cool old gun- somebody's "Pocket Roscoe".
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-15-2018, 12:09 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
NICE!
If I were selling that gun, I'd price it at $1000-1200, assuming the pearls are real nice and the gun is all original except for the bobbed hammer.
.....
|
Well, yes, but would you be BUYING the gun for that much?
|
10-16-2018, 08:43 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,020
Likes: 8,997
Liked 48,767 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
Well, yes, but would you be BUYING the gun for that much?
|
Maybe.
Show me a 4" with decent condition and some gorgeous FACTORY pearls with those small medallions and we'll see.
In my observation, the 4" may be the least common barrel length for the 1899.
I have seen exactly ONE other pair of Factory K frame pearls with the small gold medallions.
Show us your 4" Pearl.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-16-2018, 09:44 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,976
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,366 Times in 5,476 Posts
|
|
Buying that revolver for anything less than $750 would be highway robbery!!!! I sure am glad that most everybody else would have tapped out early if that gun were at auction.
I agree with Lee that you do not find many 4" 1899s. I have been lucky enough to find a couple in 38 Special and enjoy shooting them. The gold pearls make the gun and I think the OP should get the letter to prove that they belong on that particular 1899. It would add more than $75 to the value for me if I were bidding on the gun.
I have an image of an 1899 hammer, but do not have any 1902s to compare, so if anyone has a pic of the insides of a Model 1902, please post.
I assume that Ivory might have been available for special order, which would be very rare if even available on the 1899s, but round butt pearls would be rare. Next would be the round butt walnut stocks, while the majority of all produced would have had hard rubber. Both are shown below.
I forgot to add that the hammer on these revolvers were not serial numbered and I would look very hard for a replacement. It would greatly improve the value of the gun and that one deserves to be put back to original if possible. I know that someone on this Forum has a 1899 hammer and this is one deserving candidate for it. You can post in the Wanted to Buy Section of this Forum and see what happens?? Second option is to find an early Model 1905 hammer and have a welding expert replace the hammer spur. The right welder can do it and it will be invisible. I can supply a name via PM if needed.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Last edited by glowe; 10-16-2018 at 09:53 AM.
Reason: added content
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-16-2018, 12:01 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,020
Likes: 8,997
Liked 48,767 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
I forgot to add that the hammer on these revolvers were not serial numbered and I would look very hard for a replacement. It would greatly improve the value of the gun and that one deserves to be put back to original if possible.
|
Sometimes, I hate modifications made to an old gun, even when they were done long ago.
Sometimes, I don't hate them, but I'm not overly fond of them.
Sometimes, I hardly mind them at all.
Sometimes, I find them quite interesting.
This gun, assuming that hammer was bobbed long ago and not in the 1970s, falls into the latter category. The wear looks more like pocket carry than holster wear. I'd REALLY like to see more pics of the hammer up close from all angles, especially from the rear. Heck, I'd love to see more pics of the whole gun.
If I thought the hammer was bobbed a century or more ago, I'd just leave it alone. It would be a century plus effort to build a Pocket Rocket.
Cool!
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-16-2018, 02:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
.....
This gun, assuming that hammer was bobbed long ago and not in the 1970s, ....
If I thought the hammer was bobbed a century or more ago, I'd just leave it alone. It would be a century plus effort to build a Pocket Rocket.
.....
|
Therein lies the crux of the matter, doesn’t it?
If Cousin Joe did this or had it done 20 years ago, definitely vandalism.
On the other hand, show an old photo of Greatgrandpa with the bobbed-hammer gun in his belt, and it’s a customized artefact and unique heirloom, and selling the picture with the gun may actually increase the price you can get
To realize the higher values mentioned here, you’d have to be or find someone willing to take that on faith.
|
10-16-2018, 03:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,976
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,366 Times in 5,476 Posts
|
|
So you can have and keep both hammers - the best of both worlds.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|