|
|
03-04-2020, 07:34 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
1950 Military
Here are a couple photographs of a 1950 Military model that has come to live with my other ACP revolvers.
Made before model numbers so after 1950 and before 1957. Not a birth year revolver but at least made in a year I had a birthday.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 51 Users Like Post:
|
22hipower, 4barrel, 6string, Andy Taylor, bgrafsr, bmcgilvray, bruce5781, cndrdk, daddio202, damienph, deyomatic, fdover, GyMac, Hunter Keith, IWK2HT, JayCeeNC, k22fan, Kansasgunner, kennethg, kmyers, krsmith58, kryten67, lamarw, Lee Barner, LEO918, LLOYD17, M E Morrison, mh51, moosedog, Mrnurse, mtgianni, Muley Gil, Narragansett, NavySCPO, Nedroe, OldChief, Old_Cop, pawncop, Pig Hunter, quinn, reccpd101, Russell Cottle, S-W4EVER, Sandman4delta, series guy, shrade, steelslaver, The Gila Bender, tt66, usmc2427765, vonn |
03-04-2020, 08:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 244
Likes: 1,420
Liked 727 Times in 127 Posts
|
|
That’s a beautiful revolver I’d love to have a 50 military
Great find you’ll enjoy that one.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 08:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 244
Likes: 1,420
Liked 727 Times in 127 Posts
|
|
Sorry double posted
Last edited by IWK2HT; 03-04-2020 at 08:17 AM.
Reason: Double posted
|
03-04-2020, 09:34 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWK2HT
Sorry double posted
|
Ted, it means you really like it!
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Last edited by StrawHat; 03-04-2020 at 09:44 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 11:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: West glacier, Mt
Posts: 190
Likes: 72
Liked 228 Times in 81 Posts
|
|
Sometimes you gotta find your birth year revolver. As soon as I saw a model of 1988 I had to have one which left me with a debilitating addiction to moon clip revolvers.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 01:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 902
Likes: 2,773
Liked 1,036 Times in 443 Posts
|
|
I like the front sight. Much easier to see than the half moon.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 05:29 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Memphis, TN, USA
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 1,615
Liked 1,673 Times in 441 Posts
|
|
These are great guns. Arguably one of the best combat revolvers ever made. There are a lot of these in the S92000 range. Not that many of them around, especially the model 22 versions.
__________________
S&WCA 1729
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 08:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 11,163
Liked 12,133 Times in 1,942 Posts
|
|
I have S1098xx which shipped in August, 1954, however, it is not in nearly as nice a shape as yours. You jost don't see that many 1950 Armies around. Congrats. Now you need a 1950 45 Target and and '55 target just to keep him company if you don't arlready have them.
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 09:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 1,527
Liked 5,592 Times in 1,613 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennexplorer
These are great guns. Arguably one of the best combat revolvers ever made. There are a lot of these in the S92000 range. Not that many of them around, especially the model 22 versions.
|
I found this one at a gun show a couple of years ago. It is in the high S92,000 serial number range and shipped in June, 1952. A friend of mine called it a "bohunk revolver".
Last edited by Walter Rego; 03-04-2020 at 09:17 PM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 09:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 2,637
Liked 1,588 Times in 713 Posts
|
|
Looking at the serial number in the third picture, it was made 1952-1953.
__________________
Pine_Worker
Ex-LEO, NRA Life
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 10:48 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pine_Worker
Looking at the serial number in the third picture, it was made 1952-1953.
|
Thank you.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2020, 11:38 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 220
Liked 1,315 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
I bought this one some 25 years ago. Close to your number and shipped in 1953.
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
4barrel, Andy Taylor, bmcgilvray, daddio202, Hunter Keith, Kansasgunner, kmyers, Roberto Renauld, Russell Cottle, StrawHat, usmc2427765, Walter Rego |
03-05-2020, 12:04 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: STL
Posts: 887
Likes: 1,100
Liked 4,189 Times in 547 Posts
|
|
It shipped in April 1952. Shot it yet?
__________________
SWCA: 3154
SWHF: 552
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-05-2020, 07:51 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LLOYD17
It shipped in April 1952. Shot it yet?
|
No, but I have dryfired it to refamiliarize myself with the short action. Got some cast reloads ready to go. Just need to squeeze in a half hour to get it out shooting.
Thank you again.
Kevin
ps. My mistake, I did not have a birthday in that year.
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-08-2020, 09:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
I took the 1950 and the 1917 out shooting today. Each got 30 rounds of 240 LSWC over the standard dose of Bullseye. Both shot well at 25 and 50 yards.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2020, 02:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,738
Likes: 10,517
Liked 6,034 Times in 2,972 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Rego
I found this one at a gun show a couple of years ago. It is in the high S92,000 serial number range and shipped in June, 1952. A friend of mine called it a "bohunk revolver".
|
He must have held "Bohunks" in high regard. That is a beautiful gun.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2020, 11:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'Beachy' SoCal
Posts: 522
Likes: 12
Liked 761 Times in 280 Posts
|
|
My "Pre 22, SN 86198, wearing non-original grips. Throwing in my Pre 26, SN 79335, appearing all original!
Thanks for an interesting Thread and some quite nice Smiths!
Best!
John
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-17-2020, 09:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,108
Liked 5,154 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
Nice revolver. Too bad the front sight was butchered.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-17-2020, 10:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 3,122
Liked 4,807 Times in 1,538 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennexplorer
These are great guns. Arguably one of the best combat revolvers ever made.
|
So good they almost make you wanna go looking for trouble!
Someone commented on the "butchered" front sight.
How do you like it at the range?
I recently shot my USFA SAA at an uncovered outdoor range at my usual 50 yd distance. It has the usual curved profile SAA front sight. The sun was starting to go down, and after changing my targets, I was surprised to see my offhand groups stay about the same size but with a much higher point of impact.
The front sight on the OP's 1950 reminds me of the Colt New Service "shark tooth" sight. Sometimes functionality comes first!
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-18-2020, 08:43 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6string
...Someone commented on the "butchered" front sight.
How do you like it at the range?...Jim...
|
Jim,
The sights on the 1950 are much easier to see than on the 1917. Groups were about the same but acquisition was much easier. The skinny sights (1917) made me concentrate more, not a bad thing. Instinctive shooting was the same with both. But for long range, give me the visible sights.
I am considering adding a gold or ivory dot to the 1950.
And a photograph of the sight in question.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-20-2020, 05:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northwest Florida
Posts: 421
Likes: 50
Liked 311 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
My 1950 Army is also in the 92,000 range. I actually carried it on duty for a few years after my old 1917 got retired. I changed out the grips, hammer and trigger for on duty carry, but I kept the originals, so I can restore it back to original specs one day. Excellent revolver.
__________________
Retired Dep Sheriff & Armorer
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-20-2020, 07:59 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,547
Likes: 89,899
Liked 24,943 Times in 8,538 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandspur6
My 1950 Army is also in the 92,000 range. I actually carried it on duty for a few years after my old 1917 got retired. I changed out the grips, hammer and trigger for on duty carry, but I kept the originals, so I can restore it back to original specs one day. Excellent revolver.
|
What brand, model and barrel length holster do you use for duty use?
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|